journal article·2020-12-23

Electrogravimetry and Structural Properties of Thin Silicon Layers Deposited in Sulfolane and Ionic Liquid Electrolytes

Steffen Link, Anna Dimitrova, Stefan Krischok, Andreas Bund, Svetlozar Ivanov

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 51
Publisher page

Abstract

Potentiostatic deposition of silicon is performed in sulfolane (SL) and ionic liquid (IL) electrolytes. Electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance with damping monitoring (EQCM-D) is used as main analytical tool for the characterization of the reduction process. The apparent molar mass (Mapp) is applied for in situ estimation of the layer contamination. By means of this approach, appropriate electrolyte composition and substrate type are selected to optimize the structural properties of the layers. The application of SL electrolyte results in silicon deposition with higher efficiency compared to the IL 1-butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide, [BMP][TFSI]. This has been associated with the instability of the IL in the presence of silicon tetrachloride and the enhanced incorporation of IL decomposition products into the growing silicon deposit. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis supports the results about the layer composition, as suggested from the microgravimetric experiments. Attention has been given to the impact of practically relevant substrates (i.e., Cu, Ni, and vitreous carbon) on the reduction process. An effective deposition can be carried out on the metal electrodes in both electrolytes due to accelerated reaction kinetics for these types of substrates. However, on vitreous carbon (VC), a successful reduction of SiCl4 can only be accomplished in the IL, while the electroreduction process in SL is dominated by the decomposition of the electrolyte. For short deposition times, the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images display rough morphologies in the nanometer range, which evolve further to structures with increased length scale of the surface roughness. The development of a rough interface during deposition, resulting in QCM damping at advanced stages of the process, is interpreted by a model accounting for the resistive force caused by the interaction of the liquid with a nonuniform layer interface. By using this approach, the individual contributions of the surface roughness and viscoelastic effects to the measured damping values are estimated.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Semiconductor materials and devices · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Electrochemistry and Electroplating Group, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Gustav-Kirchhoff-Straße 6, Ilmenau 98693, Germany

Institute of Physics and Institute of Micro- and Nanotechnologies, MacroNano, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau 98693, Germany

Funding

European Commission · Freistaat Th??ringen · Cusanuswerk

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.7567/JJAP.57.08RB1110.7567/JJAP.57.08RB11 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.09.02610.1016/j.tsf.2011.09.026 ↗
3. 10.1021/cr500207g10.1021/cr500207g ↗
4. Xakalashe B. S. · Chem. Technol. · 2012 · 6
5. 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.06.02610.1016/j.electacta.2007.06.026 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.elecom.2004.03.01310.1016/j.elecom.2004.03.013 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.01.09710.1016/j.electacta.2010.01.097 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.02.06410.1016/j.matlet.2012.02.064 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.21610.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.216 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.01310.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.013 ↗
11. 10.1149/1.212723710.1149/1.2127237 ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20100147510.1002/adfm.201001475 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.mseb.2012.04.02710.1016/j.mseb.2012.04.027 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.06510.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.065 ↗
15. 10.1149/1.209553210.1149/1.2095532 ↗
16. 10.1039/C4CP02797C10.1039/C4CP02797C ↗
17. 10.1021/nl802352e10.1021/nl802352e ↗
18. Park J. · Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. · 2013 · 8 · 420610.1016/S1452-3981(23)14466-X ↗
19. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.07.04310.1016/j.electacta.2012.07.043 ↗
20. 10.1039/C5RA23085C10.1039/C5RA23085C ↗
21. 10.1149/2.0761714jes10.1149/2.0761714jes ↗
22. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.04.16710.1016/j.electacta.2015.04.167 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10008-013-2185-110.1007/s10008-013-2185-1 ↗
24. 10.1524/zpch.2006.220.10.148310.1524/zpch.2006.220.10.1483 ↗
25. 10.1021/jp711804j10.1021/jp711804j ↗
26. 10.1007/BF0133793710.1007/BF01337937 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.09.07610.1016/j.electacta.2013.09.076 ↗
28. 10.1149/1.149717310.1149/1.1497173 ↗
29. 10.1039/a903596f10.1039/a903596f ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.486610.1103/PhysRevB.49.4866 ↗
31. 10.1021/ac010761010.1021/ac0107610 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.09.15610.1016/j.electacta.2016.09.156 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.elecom.2019.04.00810.1016/j.elecom.2019.04.008 ↗
34. Lagowski J. J. · 2012
35. 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.10.02810.1016/j.electacta.2007.10.028 ↗
36. 10.1016/0167-2584(85)90839-410.1016/0167-2584(85)90839-4 ↗
37. 10.1021/ac00285a06210.1021/ac00285a062 ↗
38. 10.1002/elan.20050343510.1002/elan.200503435 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.5.470910.1103/PhysRevB.5.4709 ↗
40. 10.1016/0368-2048(76)80015-110.1016/0368-2048(76)80015-1 ↗
41. 10.1149/1.194642710.1149/1.1946427 ↗
42. Milchev A. · 2002
43. 10.1016/S0039-6028(98)00363-X10.1016/S0039-6028(98)00363-X ↗
44. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.02.07510.1016/j.apsusc.2010.02.075 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0246210.1021/acs.jpcc.8b02462 ↗
46. 10.1143/JJAP.33.L67510.1143/JJAP.33.L675 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.06.01410.1016/j.elecom.2011.06.014 ↗
48. 10.1016/0169-4332(91)90116-210.1016/0169-4332(91)90116-2 ↗
49. 10.1063/1.36128910.1063/1.361289 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2019.12534610.1016/j.jcrysgro.2019.125346 ↗