Multifunctional and Sensitivity Enhancement of Hybrid Acoustoplasmonic Sensors Fabricated on 36XY-LiTaO3 with Gold Nanoparticles for the Detection of Permittivity, Conductivity, and the Refractive Index
Source abstract
Abstract
Integration of high-sensitivity sensors with multiple sensing performance for the environmental detection of permittivity (εr), conductivity (σ), and the refractive index (n) is required to support Societies 5.0. However, there are still many sensors with low sensitivity that stand alone. A shear-horizontal surface acoustic wave (SH-SAW) sensor is usually used because of its high-sensitivity performance in detecting electrical properties. Moreover, localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) sensors show remarkable optical side capability. Here, we have successfully combined these advantages with an additional benefit of sensitivity enhancement. We propose a hybrid acoustoplasmonic sensor generated by integrating SH-SAW and LSPR devices to simultaneously detect εr, σ, and n. The SH-SAW sensor was fabricated on a 36XY-LiTaO3 substrate using a developed interdigital transducer. Then, the LSPR sensor was implemented by the deposition of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) on the propagation surfaces of the SH-SAW sensor. Fascinatingly, the AuNPs not only generate the LSPR effect but also enhance the SH-SAW sensor sensitivity. Comprehensive investigations were performed with atomic force microscopy imaging, CST software used for plasmonic E-field simulation, and hybrid sensing evaluation. Moreover, the SH-SAW sensitivity enhancement achieved using AuNPs was verified by frequency-domain and time-domain measurements. Thus, the SH-SAW sensor with AuNPs has a wide εr detection range (25–85), sensing capabilities for ultrasmall σ (0.00528–0.02504 S/m), and high sensitivity for n detection (45.5–201.9 nm/RIU). The cross-sectional effects were also evaluated. The effect of the LSPR device on the SH-SAW device was examined by turning the light OFF or ON (hereafter OFF/ON). The impact of the SH-SAW device on the LSPR device was investigated by turning the sine signal OFF/ON. We found that the SH-SAW sensor was not impacted by light. Interestingly, the presence of the SH-SAW sensor affects the positions of the AuNPs, which consistently generates a small blueshift in the LSPR effect. However, insignificant variation was noted in independent performances. In general, the SH-SAW sensor with AuNPs shows multifunctional independent characteristics and high-sensitivity performance, making it suitable for a chemical environment, with the possibility of integration with a wireless network.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate School of Science and Technology, Shizuoka University, 3-5-1 Johoku, Naka-Ku, Hamamatsu-shi, Shizuoka 432-8561, Japan
Department of Electrical Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus Baru UI Depok, Depok, West Java 16424, Indonesia
Graduate School of Integrated Science and Technology, Shizuoka University, 3-5-1 Johoku, Naka-Ku, Hamamatsu-shi, Shizuoka 432-8561, Japan
Funding
This research was subsidized by JKA through its promotion found from KEIRIN RACE.
References (80)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41598-019-57291-010.1038/s41598-019-57291-0 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsami.6b1684010.1021/acsami.6b16840 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsami.0c1217610.1021/acsami.0c12176 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41467-020-17619-110.1038/s41467-020-17619-1 ↗
5. 10.1109/JSEN.2018.288223910.1109/JSEN.2018.2882239 ↗
6. 10.1088/2399-7532/aada7b10.1088/2399-7532/aada7b ↗
7. 10.1021/acssensors.7b0004710.1021/acssensors.7b00047 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.0c0606710.1021/acsami.0c06067 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.snb.2016.10.04310.1016/j.snb.2016.10.043 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsami.9b1633610.1021/acsami.9b16336 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.5b0107010.1021/acsami.5b01070 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.36610.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.366 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0154510.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01545 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.7b0038010.1021/acsami.7b00380 ↗
15. 10.1021/acssensors.0c0001310.1021/acssensors.0c00013 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.07.11710.1016/j.snb.2018.07.117 ↗
17. 10.1021/acssensors.0c0094810.1021/acssensors.0c00948 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.bios.2012.06.02310.1016/j.bios.2012.06.023 ↗
19. 10.1109/JSEN.2002.80374310.1109/JSEN.2002.803743 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.bios.2017.08.03810.1016/j.bios.2017.08.038 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.sbsr.2016.05.00710.1016/j.sbsr.2016.05.007 ↗
22. 10.1109/JSEN.2013.224105210.1109/JSEN.2013.2241052 ↗
23. 10.1109/JSEN.2014.233505810.1109/JSEN.2014.2335058 ↗
24. 10.1039/b911953a10.1039/b911953a ↗
25. 10.1109/JSEN.2017.275777010.1109/JSEN.2017.2757770 ↗
26. Narushima, A.; Genji, T.; Kondoh, J. Combination of a Surface Acoustic Wave Device and Classical Sensor for Detecting Physical Quantity 1- Simultaneous Detection Method of Physical Quantity and Temperature. In Proceedings of Symposium on Ultrasonic Electronics; 2012, 33, 67–68.
27. 10.3390/s2008218410.3390/s20082184 ↗
28. 10.1021/acssensors.7b0085110.1021/acssensors.7b00851 ↗
29. Kondoh J. · 1991 · 82
30. 10.1143/jjap.40.371310.1143/jjap.40.3713 ↗
31. 10.1021/acssensors.0c0025910.1021/acssensors.0c00259 ↗
32. Shiokawa S. · IEEE Ultrason. Symp. · 1999 · 445
33. 10.1002/ecjb.442079030610.1002/ecjb.4420790306 ↗
34. 10.1109/ultsym.1993.33945710.1109/ultsym.1993.339457 ↗
35. 10.1002/ecjb.442078080610.1002/ecjb.4420780806 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.00610.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.006 ↗
37. 10.1109/EFTF-IFC.2013.670226610.1109/EFTF-IFC.2013.6702266 ↗
38. 10.1109/JSEN.2011.216370710.1109/JSEN.2011.2163707 ↗
39. 10.1002/ecjb.442076020810.1002/ecjb.4420760208 ↗
40. 10.1002/ecjb.442078011110.1002/ecjb.4420780111 ↗
41. Bohren C. F. · 199810.1002/9783527618156 ↗
42. 10.1021/cr100313v10.1021/cr100313v ↗
43. 10.1016/j.snb.2014.01.11010.1016/j.snb.2014.01.110 ↗
44. 10.1109/ISSE.2014.688762710.1109/ISSE.2014.6887627 ↗
45. 10.1021/am100878r10.1021/am100878r ↗
46. 10.1021/jz200482f10.1021/jz200482f ↗
47. 10.1039/c2cc33266c10.1039/c2cc33266c ↗
48. 10.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.10460710.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.104607 ↗
49. 10.1142/9789814287005_003210.1142/9789814287005_0032 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.optcom.2013.06.00210.1016/j.optcom.2013.06.002 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.cplett.2018.03.03110.1016/j.cplett.2018.03.031 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10870210.1016/j.matdes.2020.108702 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.05810.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.058 ↗
54. 10.1021/acsami.7b0697710.1021/acsami.7b06977 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.04.05210.1016/j.rinp.2018.04.052 ↗
56. 10.1021/acsami.6b0072610.1021/acsami.6b00726 ↗
57. Refractive index database (accessed Jul 10, 2020).
58. 10.1002/mop.3084810.1002/mop.30848 ↗
59. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.298937010.1109/ACCESS.2020.2989370 ↗
60. 10.1109/TUFFC.2017.273428210.1109/TUFFC.2017.2734282 ↗
61. 10.1049/el.2017.112110.1049/el.2017.1121 ↗
62. Haynes W. M · 2016 · 410.1201/9781315380476 ↗
63. 10.1021/acsaelm.9b0031510.1021/acsaelm.9b00315 ↗
64. 10.1007/s10832-013-9782-310.1007/s10832-013-9782-3 ↗
65. Rimeika R. · Phys. Status Solidi Appl. Res. · 1998 · 168 · 65
66. 10.3390/proceedings104039410.3390/proceedings1040394 ↗
67. 10.3897/j.moem.6.2.5429510.3897/j.moem.6.2.54295 ↗
68. 10.1109/JSEN.2014.235379410.1109/JSEN.2014.2353794 ↗
69. 10.3390/s1612202410.3390/s16122024 ↗
70. 10.1063/1.294955310.1063/1.2949553 ↗
71. 10.1007/s00542-020-04766-010.1007/s00542-020-04766-0 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.nantod.2015.02.00710.1016/j.nantod.2015.02.007 ↗
73. 10.1021/la800305j10.1021/la800305j ↗
74. 10.1038/s41598-019-50032-310.1038/s41598-019-50032-3 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.sna.2020.11200610.1016/j.sna.2020.112006 ↗
76. 10.1021/cm902676d10.1021/cm902676d ↗
77. 10.1007/s13204-015-0489-410.1007/s13204-015-0489-4 ↗
78. 10.3390/ma1302036910.3390/ma13020369 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.microrel.2015.05.01210.1016/j.microrel.2015.05.012 ↗
80. http://gwyddion.net/ (accessed Apr 17, 2020).