Effective Contact Potential of Thin Film Metal-Insulator Nanostructures and Its Role in Self-Powered Nanofilm X-ray Sensors
Source abstract
Abstract
We studied the effective contact potential difference (ECPD) of thin film nanostructures and its role in self-powered X-ray sensors, which use the high-energy current detection scheme. We compared the response to kilovoltage X-rays of several nanostructures made of disparate combinations of conductors (Al, Cu, Ta, ITO) and oxides (SiO 2, Ta 2 O 5, Al 2 O 3 ). We measured current–voltage curves in parallel-plate configuration separated by an air gap and determined three characteristic parameters: current at zero voltage bias I 0, the voltage offset for zero current ECPD, and saturation current I sat . We found that the metals’ ECPD values measured with our technique were higher than the CPD values measured with photoelectron spectroscopy in situ, i.e., no air contact. These differences are related to natural oxidization and to the presence of photo-/Auger-electron current leaking from the high- Z toward the low- Z electrode, as suggested by additional experiments carried out in vacuum. Further, the deposition of the 40–500 nm oxide layer on the surface of metallic substrates strongly affects their contact potential. This technique exploits ionization and charge carrier transport in both solid insulators and in air, and it opens the possibility of measuring the ECPD between metals separated by a solid insulator in a metal–insulator–metal (MIM) configuration. Additionally, we demonstrated that certain configurations of MIM structures are suitable for X-ray detection in self-powered mode.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215,United States
University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts 01854, United States
Funding
Commercialization, Venture and Intellectual Property, University of Massachusetts Lowell · Joint Center for Radiation Therapy, Harvard University
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1118/1.493553110.1118/1.4935531 ↗
2. 10.1118/1.493553210.1118/1.4935532 ↗
3. 10.1088/0031-9155/60/7/N12110.1088/0031-9155/60/7/N121 ↗
4. 10.1088/0022-3727/48/27/27550310.1088/0022-3727/48/27/275503 ↗
5. 10.1088/0031-9155/61/16/N40310.1088/0031-9155/61/16/N403 ↗
6. 10.1088/0031-9155/60/15/589110.1088/0031-9155/60/15/5891 ↗
7. 10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.445410.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4454 ↗
8. 10.1118/1.492220210.1118/1.4922202 ↗
9. Hüfner S. · 200310.1007/978-3-662-09280-4 ↗
10. 10.1007/BF0290361110.1007/BF02903611 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.10522710.1063/1.105227 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.surfrep.2010.10.00110.1016/j.surfrep.2010.10.001 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0001-8686(03)00051-410.1016/S0001-8686(03)00051-4 ↗
14. 10.1149/1.139111610.1149/1.1391116 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.348845710.1063/1.3488457 ↗
16. 10.1088/0305-4608/3/9/01610.1088/0305-4608/3/9/016 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0379-6779(02)01290-010.1016/S0379-6779(02)01290-0 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.218130010.1063/1.2181300 ↗
19. 10.1149/2.048206jes10.1149/2.048206jes ↗
20. 10.1002/adfm.20120061510.1002/adfm.201200615 ↗
21. 10.1002/adfm.20120099310.1002/adfm.201200993 ↗
22. Speight J. · 2004
23. Schlaf, R.Calibration of Photoemission Spectra and Work Function, Determinationhttp://rsl.eng.usf.edu/Documents/Tutorials/PEScalibration.pdf.
24. 10.1016/S0368-2048(01)00310-310.1016/S0368-2048(01)00310-3 ↗
25. 10.1088/0031-9155/3/4/30710.1088/0031-9155/3/4/307 ↗
26. 10.1109/TNS.1977.432925110.1109/TNS.1977.4329251 ↗