journal article·2012-01-25

Numerical Evaluation on Heat Transport Characteristics Between Al2O3 and ZnO Materials in Nanoscale Situation

Ping Yang, Haifeng Xu, Liqiang Zhang, Fangwei Xie, Jianming Yang

Publisher page

Abstract

The aim of this article is to provide a systematic method to perform numerical evaluation on the cross-plane thermal conductivity of Al(2)O(3)/ZnO film interface. The Equilibrium Molecular Dynamics (EMD) simulations method is used to investigate the cross-plane thermal conductivity of Al(2)O(3)/ZnO film interface along the direction of Z axis at different equilibrium temperature and film interface thickness. The Buckingham two-body potential function and Green-Kubo linear response theory are used for modeling and calculation. The results show that the size effect is obvious. It implies the film interface thickness is 23.4-52 Å and the equilibrium temperature is 300-600 K. The cross section thermal conductivity of Al(2)O(3)/ZnO film interface increases with the increase of interface thickness, and decreases with the increase in equilibrium temperature.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Thermal properties of materials · Heat Transfer and Optimization · Numerical methods in engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratory of Advanced Design, Manufacturing & Reliability for MEMS/NEMS/ODES, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, P. R. China

Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL A1B 3X5, Canada

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Chou F. C. · Annu. Rev. Heat Transfer · 1999 · 10 · 14110.1615/AnnualRevHeatTransfer.v10.60 ↗
2. Lukes J. R. · Trans. ASME, Ser. C · 2000 · 122 · 53610.1115/1.1288405 ↗
3. Xin-gang L. · Microscale Thermophys. Eng. · 2005 · 9 · 29510.1080/10893950500196469 ↗
4. Yunfei C. · Physica B · 2004 · 349 · 27010.1016/j.physb.2004.03.247 ↗
5. Volz S. · Microelectron. J. · 2000 · 31 · 81510.1016/S0026-2692(00)00064-1 ↗
6. Yang P. · Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. · 2008 · 92 · 32910.1007/s00339-008-4521-3 ↗
7. Abramson A. R. · J. Heat Transfer · 2002 · 124 · 96310.1115/1.1495516 ↗
8. Hegedus P. J. · Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer · 2006 · 49 · 492110.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.05.030 ↗
9. Stevens R. J. · Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer · 2007 · 50 · 397710.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.01.040 ↗
10. Rapaport, D. C.Cambridge University Press:New York, 1995; pp1–3.
11. Allen, M. P.; Tildesley, D. J.Computer Simulation of Liquids;Oxford University Press:New York, 1989; p230.
12. Gutierrez G. · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 65 · 10420210.1103/PhysRevB.65.104202 ↗
13. Adiga S. P. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 742210.1021/jp0701035 ↗
14. Kulkarni A. J. · Nanotechnology · 2005 · 16 · 274910.1088/0957-4484/16/12/001 ↗
15. Dmitriev S. V. · Acta Mater. · 2004 · 52 · 195910.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.037 ↗
16. Majumdar A. · J. Heat Transfer · 1993 · 115 · 710.1115/1.2910673 ↗
17. Liao N. B. · Mater. Sci. Eng., A · 2010 · 527 · 607610.1016/j.msea.2010.06.032 ↗
18. Yang P. · Acta Phys. Sin. · 2011 · 60 · 06660110.7498/aps.60.066601 ↗
19. Flik M. I. · J. Heat Transfer · 1992 · 114 · 66610.1115/1.2911332 ↗