Numerical Evaluation on Heat Transport Characteristics Between Al2O3 and ZnO Materials in Nanoscale Situation
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of this article is to provide a systematic method to perform numerical evaluation on the cross-plane thermal conductivity of Al(2)O(3)/ZnO film interface. The Equilibrium Molecular Dynamics (EMD) simulations method is used to investigate the cross-plane thermal conductivity of Al(2)O(3)/ZnO film interface along the direction of Z axis at different equilibrium temperature and film interface thickness. The Buckingham two-body potential function and Green-Kubo linear response theory are used for modeling and calculation. The results show that the size effect is obvious. It implies the film interface thickness is 23.4-52 Å and the equilibrium temperature is 300-600 K. The cross section thermal conductivity of Al(2)O(3)/ZnO film interface increases with the increase of interface thickness, and decreases with the increase in equilibrium temperature.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermal properties of materials · Heat Transfer and Optimization · Numerical methods in engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory of Advanced Design, Manufacturing & Reliability for MEMS/NEMS/ODES, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, P. R. China
Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL A1B 3X5, Canada
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Chou F. C. · Annu. Rev. Heat Transfer · 1999 · 10 · 14110.1615/AnnualRevHeatTransfer.v10.60 ↗
2. Lukes J. R. · Trans. ASME, Ser. C · 2000 · 122 · 53610.1115/1.1288405 ↗
3. Xin-gang L. · Microscale Thermophys. Eng. · 2005 · 9 · 29510.1080/10893950500196469 ↗
4. Yunfei C. · Physica B · 2004 · 349 · 27010.1016/j.physb.2004.03.247 ↗
5. Volz S. · Microelectron. J. · 2000 · 31 · 81510.1016/S0026-2692(00)00064-1 ↗
6. Yang P. · Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. · 2008 · 92 · 32910.1007/s00339-008-4521-3 ↗
7. Abramson A. R. · J. Heat Transfer · 2002 · 124 · 96310.1115/1.1495516 ↗
8. Hegedus P. J. · Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer · 2006 · 49 · 492110.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.05.030 ↗
9. Stevens R. J. · Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer · 2007 · 50 · 397710.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.01.040 ↗
10. Rapaport, D. C.Cambridge University Press:New York, 1995; pp1–3.
11. Allen, M. P.; Tildesley, D. J.Computer Simulation of Liquids;Oxford University Press:New York, 1989; p230.
12. Gutierrez G. · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 65 · 10420210.1103/PhysRevB.65.104202 ↗
13. Adiga S. P. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 742210.1021/jp0701035 ↗
14. Kulkarni A. J. · Nanotechnology · 2005 · 16 · 274910.1088/0957-4484/16/12/001 ↗
15. Dmitriev S. V. · Acta Mater. · 2004 · 52 · 195910.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.037 ↗
16. Majumdar A. · J. Heat Transfer · 1993 · 115 · 710.1115/1.2910673 ↗
17. Liao N. B. · Mater. Sci. Eng., A · 2010 · 527 · 607610.1016/j.msea.2010.06.032 ↗
18. Yang P. · Acta Phys. Sin. · 2011 · 60 · 06660110.7498/aps.60.066601 ↗
19. Flik M. I. · J. Heat Transfer · 1992 · 114 · 66610.1115/1.2911332 ↗