journal article·2020-12-16Open access

Virtually Transparent TiO2/Polyelectrolyte Thin Multilayer Films as High-Efficiency Nanoporous Photocatalytic Coatings for Breaking Down Formic Acid and for Escherichia coli Removal

Marvin Motay, David Martel, Bertrand Vileno, Charline Soraru, Lydie Ploux, María Guadalupe Méndez-Medrano, Christophe Colbeau-Justin, Gero Decher, Nicolas Keller

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 50

Abstract

Virtually transparent photocatalytic multilayer films composed of TiO 2 nanoparticles and polyelectrolytes were built on model surfaces using layer-by-layer assembly and investigated as photocatalytic nanoporous coatings. Formic acid (HCOOH) and Escherichia coli were used as models for the degradation of gaseous pollutants and for studying antibacterial properties. Positively charged TiO 2 nanoparticles were coassembled with negatively charged poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) (NaPSS) which leads to highly transparent nanoscale coatings in which the content of TiO 2 particles is controlled mainly by the number of deposition cycles and the enhanced translucency with respect to titania powders is likely due to the presence of the polyelectrolytes in the interstitial space between the particles. Build-up and structural properties of the films were determined by ellipsometry, quartz crystal microbalance (QCM-D, with dissipation monitoring), and UV–vis spectrophotometry in transmission and scanning electron microscopy. Complementary photophysical and activity tests of (PSS/TiO 2 ) n multilayer films were performed in the gas-phase under UV-A light and revealed a peculiar dependence on the number of layer pairs (LPs), corresponding to a clear deviation from the usual observations in photocatalysis with increasing TiO 2 amounts. Most notably, a single LP film showed a strongly enhanced HCOOH mineralization and outperformed films with a higher number of LPs, with respect to the quantity of TiO 2 catalyst present in the films. It is believed that the high quantum yield (8.1%) of a coating consisting of a single TiO 2 layer which is 6–7 times higher than that of a 6–10 LP film could be due to the optimum accessibility of the TiO 2 crystallites toward both HCOOH and water molecules. In thicker films, while no detrimental light screening was observed with increasing the number of LPs, diffusion phenomena could cap the efficiency of the access of the pollutant and water to the catalytic surface. Unlike for HCOOH mineralization, three PSS/TiO 2 LPs were required for observing a maximum antibacterial activity of the nanocomposite coatings. This is likely due to the fact that micrometer-sized E. coli bacteria do not enter into the interstitial space between the TiO 2 particles and require a different surface morphology with respect to the number of active contact points for optimum degradation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institut de Chimie et Procédés pour l’Energie, l’Environnement et la Santé (ICPEES, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg), 25 rue Becquerel, 67087 Strasbourg, France

Institut Charles Sadron (UPR 22), CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, 23 rue de Loess, Strasbourg CEDEX 2 67034, France

Institut de Chimie, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, 1 rue Blaise Pascal, Strasbourg CEDEX 67008, France

Institut de Science des Matériaux de Mulhouse (IS2M, UMR7361 CNRS/Université de Haute Alsace), 15 rue Jean Starcky, 68057 Mulhouse, France

Biomaterial Bioengineering (U1121 INSERM/Université de Strasbourg), 11 rue Humann, 67000 Strasbourg, France

Institut de Chimie, CNRS UMR 8000, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405 Orsay, France

Funding

Materials Institute Carnot Alsace

References (71)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/jz300064610.1021/jz3000646 ↗
2. Dionysiou, D. D., Li Puma, G., Ye, J., Schneider, J., Bahnemann, D., Eds. Photocatalysis: Applications; RSC Energy & Environment Series Vol. 15; The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2016; pp 436.10.1039/9781782627104 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2011.02.00110.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2011.02.001 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10800-005-1627-610.1007/s10800-005-1627-6 ↗
5. 10.1007/s11356-011-0697-810.1007/s11356-011-0697-8 ↗
6. Schneider, J., Bahnemann, D., Ye, J., Li Puma, G., Dionysiou, D. D., Eds. Photocatalysis: Fundamentals and Perspectives; RSC Energy & Environment Series Vol. 14; The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2016, pp 380.10.1039/9781782622338 ↗
7. Robert D. · 2013 · 14510.1002/9783527645404.ch6 ↗
8. 10.1039/C8RA09982K10.1039/C8RA09982K ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jes.2014.09.02310.1016/j.jes.2014.09.023 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cis.2011.11.00110.1016/j.cis.2011.11.001 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.277.5330.123210.1126/science.277.5330.1232 ↗
12. Decher G. · 201210.1002/9783527646746 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2017.05.00210.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2017.05.002 ↗
14. 10.1021/ar800137710.1021/ar8001377 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.aaa249110.1126/science.aaa2491 ↗
16. 10.1039/b610778h10.1039/b610778h ↗
17. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0332610.1021/acsnano.9b03326 ↗
18. 10.1002/asia.20190062710.1002/asia.201900627 ↗
19. 10.1021/am900566n10.1021/am900566n ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.05.08010.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.05.080 ↗
21. 10.1021/am504269a10.1021/am504269a ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.6b1258510.1021/acsami.6b12585 ↗
23. 10.1039/C5TA03649F10.1039/C5TA03649F ↗
24. 10.1039/C5RA05541E10.1039/C5RA05541E ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jechem.2016.01.00910.1016/j.jechem.2016.01.009 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.7b0941610.1021/acsami.7b09416 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.05.02810.1016/j.apcata.2010.05.028 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2004.08.00110.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2004.08.001 ↗
29. 10.1039/b618448k10.1039/b618448k ↗
30. 10.1016/j.matlet.2009.05.01610.1016/j.matlet.2009.05.016 ↗
31. 10.1021/la701802310.1021/la7018023 ↗
32. 10.1002/marc.20110019210.1002/marc.201100192 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cattod.2014.07.05110.1016/j.cattod.2014.07.051 ↗
34. 10.1021/cm703096w10.1021/cm703096w ↗
35. 10.1006/jcat.2001.331610.1006/jcat.2001.3316 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2010.07.02410.1016/j.jphotochem.2010.07.024 ↗
37. 10.1006/jcat.2002.364010.1006/jcat.2002.3640 ↗
38. 10.1111/j.1600-0668.1998.tb00028.x10.1111/j.1600-0668.1998.tb00028.x ↗
39. Tompkins H. G. · 200510.1007/3-540-27488-X ↗
40. 10.1007/BF0133793710.1007/BF01337937 ↗
41. 10.1021/bm400448w10.1021/bm400448w ↗
42. 10.1023/A:102390510209410.1023/A:1023905102094 ↗
43. 10.1039/C4NJ01979B10.1039/C4NJ01979B ↗
44. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.12.07110.1016/j.apcatb.2018.12.071 ↗
45. 10.1080/00268976.2018.143388210.1080/00268976.2018.1433882 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2012.02.02410.1016/j.jphotochem.2012.02.024 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.04.02710.1016/j.apcatb.2018.04.027 ↗
48. de Lasa H. · 2005 · 11910.1007/0-387-27591-6_6 ↗
49. 10.1021/acsabm.0c0046710.1021/acsabm.0c00467 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.09.01510.1016/j.mimet.2008.09.015 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.08.06010.1016/j.apcatb.2017.08.060 ↗
52. 10.1166/jnn.2005.14910.1166/jnn.2005.149 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.08.00910.1016/j.apcatb.2004.08.009 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.05.01210.1016/j.apcatb.2010.05.012 ↗
55. 10.1021/cr00017a01610.1021/cr00017a016 ↗
56. 10.1002/mrm.2195810.1002/mrm.21958 ↗
57. 10.1080/08927014.2012.67321910.1080/08927014.2012.673219 ↗
58. 10.1016/0005-2736(73)90008-410.1016/0005-2736(73)90008-4 ↗
59. 10.1371/journal.pone.007858610.1371/journal.pone.0078586 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.crci.2008.09.00910.1016/j.crci.2008.09.009 ↗
61. 10.1021/es980036f10.1021/es980036f ↗
62. 10.3390/w1204109910.3390/w12041099 ↗
63. 10.1007/BF0270561610.1007/BF02705616 ↗
64. 10.1021/jp003541j10.1021/jp003541j ↗
65. 10.1023/A:102668132158410.1023/A:1026681321584 ↗
66. 10.1021/jp507551y10.1021/jp507551y ↗
67. 10.1016/S0169-4332(02)00612-810.1016/S0169-4332(02)00612-8 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.cocis.2004.05.02210.1016/j.cocis.2004.05.022 ↗
69. 10.1021/ma035326h10.1021/ma035326h ↗
70. 10.1021/jp035740j10.1021/jp035740j ↗
71. 10.1021/la901118510.1021/la9011185 ↗