journal article·2014-08-27Open access

Fate of Half-Metallicity Near Interfaces: The Case of NiMnSb/MgO and NiMnSi/MgO

Rui-Jing Zhang, Ulrich Eckern, Udo Schwingenschlögl

Abstract

The electronic and magnetic properties of the interfaces between the half-metallic Heusler alloys NiMnSb, NiMnSi, and MgO have been investigated using first-principles density-functional calculations with projector augmented wave potentials generated in the generalized gradient approximation. In the case of the NiMnSb/MgO (100) interface, the half-metallicity is lost, whereas the MnSb/MgO contact in the NiMnSb/MgO (100) interface maintains a substantial degree of spin polarization at the Fermi level (∼60%). Remarkably, the NiMnSi/MgO (111) interface shows 100% spin polarization at the Fermi level, despite considerable distortions at the interface, as well as rather short Si/O bonds after full structural optimization. This behavior markedly distinguishes NiMnSi/MgO (111) from the corresponding NiMnSb/CdS and NiMnSb/InP interfaces.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Heusler alloys: electronic and magnetic properties · Magnetic properties of thin films · Semiconductor materials and interfaces

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Physics, University of Augsburg, 86135 Augsburg, Germany

King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Physical Sciences and Engineering Division, Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · King Abdullah University of Science and Technology

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Dinh V. A. · J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. · 2008 · 77 · 01470510.1143/JPSJ.77.014705 ↗
2. Katayama-Yoshida H. · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 46 · L77710.1143/JJAP.46.L777 ↗
3. Webster P. J. · 1988 · 19
4. Jenkins S. J. · Surf. Sci. · 2001 · 494 · L79310.1016/S0039-6028(01)01547-3 ↗
5. de Wijs G. A. · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 64 · 020402(R)10.1103/PhysRevB.64.020402 ↗
6. Galanakis I. · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2002 · 14 · 6329
7. Jenkins S. J. · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 70 · 24540110.1103/PhysRevB.70.245401 ↗
8. Galanakis I. · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2005 · 288 · 41110.1016/j.jmmm.2004.09.130 ↗
9. Lezaic M. · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2005 · 17 · 3121
10. Galanakis I. · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 21443110.1103/PhysRevB.71.214431 ↗
11. Debernardi A. · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2005 · 33 · 26310.1016/j.commatsci.2004.12.048 ↗
12. Lezaic M. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 39 · 79710.1088/0022-3727/39/5/S05 ↗
13. Blöchl P. E. · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
14. Perdew J. P. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
15. Kresse G. · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
16. Galanakis I. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 104 · 08391610.1063/1.3005882 ↗
17. Turban P. · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 65 · 13441710.1103/PhysRevB.65.134417 ↗
18. Turban P. · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2002 · 240 · 42710.1016/S0304-8853(01)00883-6 ↗
19. Sicot M. · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2006 · 303 · 5410.1016/j.jmmm.2005.10.229 ↗
20. Tsunegi S. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 42 · 19500410.1088/0022-3727/42/19/195004 ↗