Polypeptide-Mediated Switchable Microarray of Bacteria
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper describes a feasible solution for the bacterial cell death and contamination from cell division that occurs in microfluidic applications. The method adopts a smart thermoresponsive surface, highly resolved micropatterns, and surface-functionalized bacteria tagged with thermoresponsive molecules. We developed a method for controllable bacterial attachment and detachment using an elastin-like polypeptide (ELP). To create a smart surface with switchable properties, the surface of a glass substrate was conjugated with thermoresponsive ELP molecules. The attachment of bacterial cells to the ELP surface was induced by the hydrophobic affinity of the ELPs on the glass surface to tagged ELPs on the bacterial surface. A cell-repellent polymer was micropatterned to create a highly resolved space for specific bacterial adhesion. Reversible bacterial attachment and detachment was achieved by controlling the thermoresponsive phase transition of ELP molecules. Five different types of bacteria were successfully conjugated with ELPs and arrayed on the surface. The viability of the bacteria that had attached to the surface was evaluated by determining colony forming units of released bacteria on an agar plate.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biosystems and Biomaterials Science and Engineering and Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea, and Energy Plant Team, Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials, Daejeon 305-343, Korea
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Howell S. W. · Langmuir · 2003 · 19 · 43610.1021/la026365+ ↗
2. Nam S. · BioChip J. · 2007 · 1 · 111
3. Liu Z. · Appl. Environ. Microbiol. · 1995 · 61 · 356710.1128/aem.61.10.3567-3572.1995 ↗
4. Kim M. J. · Anal. Chem. · 2007 · 79 · 95510.1021/ac0614691 ↗
5. Choi H. · Sens. Actuators, B · 2007 · 123 · 26910.1016/j.snb.2006.08.019 ↗
6. Hiratsuka Y. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2006 · 103 · 1361810.1073/pnas.0604122103 ↗
7. Weibel D. B. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2005 · 102 · 1196310.1073/pnas.0505481102 ↗
8. Akin D. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2007 · 2 · 44110.1038/nnano.2007.149 ↗
9. Behkam B. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 02390210.1063/1.2431454 ↗
10. Yu H. S. · FEMS Microbiol. Lett. · 2002 · 217 · 23710.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11481.x ↗
11. Gluch M. F. · J. Bacteriol. · 1995 · 177 · 547310.1128/jb.177.19.5473-5479.1995 ↗
12. Martel S. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 23390410.1063/1.2402221 ↗
13. Jones J. F. · Appl. Environ. Microbiol. · 2003 · 69 · 651510.1128/AEM.69.11.6515-6519.2003 ↗
14. Shaw C. H. · BioEssays · 1991 · 13 · 2510.1002/bies.950130105 ↗
15. Rozhok S. · Langmuir · 2006 · 22 · 1125110.1021/la0609726 ↗
16. Rowan B. · Langmuir · 2002 · 18 · 991410.1021/la020664h ↗
17. Kim M. J. · Phys. Fluids · 2004 · 16 · L7810.1063/1.1787527 ↗
18. Razatos A. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 1998 · 95 · 1105910.1073/pnas.95.19.11059 ↗
19. Rozhok S. · Small · 2005 · 44510.1002/smll.200400072 ↗
20. Kim M. J. · Small · 2008 · 4 · 11110.1002/smll.200700641 ↗
21. Alonso M. · Macromolecules · 2001 · 34 · 807210.1021/ma010455o ↗
22. Urry D. W. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1997 · 101 · 1100710.1021/jp972167t ↗
23. Girotti A. · Macromolecules · 2004 · 37 · 339610.1021/ma035603k ↗
24. Banki M. R. · Nat. Methods · 2005 · 2 · 65910.1038/nmeth787 ↗
25. Chilkoti A. · Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. · 2006 · 10 · 65210.1016/j.cbpa.2006.10.010 ↗
26. Meyer D. E. · Cancer Res. · 2001 · 61 · 1548
27. Meyer D. E. · Biomacromolecules · 2002 · 3 · 35710.1021/bm015630n ↗
28. Na K. · Langmuir · 2008 · 24 · 491710.1021/la702796y ↗