Field-Free Deterministic Magnetization Switching Induced by Interlaced Spin–Orbit Torques
Source abstract
Abstract
Spin-orbit torque (SOT) magnetic random access memory is envisioned as an emerging nonvolatile memory due to its ultrahigh speed and low power consumption. The field-free switching scheme in SOT devices is of great interest to both academia and industry. Here, we propose a novel field-free deterministic magnetization switching scheme in a regular magnetic tunnel junction by using two currents sequentially passing interlaced paths, with less requirements of the manufacturing process or additional physical effects. The switching is bipolar since the final magnetization state depends on the combination of current paths. The functionality and robustness of the proposed scheme are validated through both macrospin and micromagnetic simulation. The influences of field-like torque and the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction effect are further researched. Our proposed scheme shows good scalability and is expected to realize novel digital logic and even computing-in-memory platforms.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Fert Beijing Research Institute, MIIT Key Laboratory of Spintronics, School of Integrated Circuit Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
Funding
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China · Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/jproc.2016.259014210.1109/jproc.2016.2590142 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.00710.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.007 ↗
3. 10.1016/0304-8853(96)00062-510.1016/0304-8853(96)00062-5 ↗
4. 10.1103/physrevb.54.935310.1103/physrevb.54.9353 ↗
5. 10.1038/nmat331110.1038/nmat3311 ↗
6. 10.1088/0022-3727/46/7/07400110.1088/0022-3727/46/7/074001 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.504179310.1063/1.5041793 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.121819710.1126/science.1218197 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.486340710.1063/1.4863407 ↗
10. 10.1038/nmat302010.1038/nmat3020 ↗
11. 10.1038/nnano.2016.2910.1038/nnano.2016.29 ↗
12. 10.1109/jproc.2016.254378210.1109/jproc.2016.2543782 ↗
13. Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Liu, Y.; Li, S.; Chang, L.; Kang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, W. Progresses and Challenges of Spin Orbit Torque Driven Magnetization Switching and Application. 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), 2018, pp 1–5.10.1109/ISCAS.2018.8351767 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.7b1691910.1021/acsami.7b16919 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.9b2084410.1021/acsami.9b20844 ↗
16. 10.1103/physrevb.94.17443410.1103/physrevb.94.174434 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.509803310.1063/1.5098033 ↗
18. 10.1103/physrevapplied.13.02405210.1103/physrevapplied.13.024052 ↗
19. 10.1038/nnano.2014.9410.1038/nnano.2014.94 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.491910810.1063/1.4919108 ↗
21. 10.1073/pnas.150747411210.1073/pnas.1507474112 ↗
22. 10.1038/nmat456610.1038/nmat4566 ↗
23. 10.1038/nnano.2016.8410.1038/nnano.2016.84 ↗
24. 10.1038/nnano.2016.10910.1038/nnano.2016.109 ↗
25. 10.1038/ncomms1085410.1038/ncomms10854 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.9b0914610.1021/acsami.9b09146 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.505219410.1063/1.5052194 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41524-020-0347-010.1038/s41524-020-0347-0 ↗
29. 10.1088/1361-6463/ab751110.1088/1361-6463/ab7511 ↗
30. 10.1103/physrevapplied.3.06401210.1103/physrevapplied.3.064012 ↗
31. 10.1103/physrevapplied.10.03404710.1103/physrevapplied.10.034047 ↗
32. 10.1103/physrevb.97.14441610.1103/physrevb.97.144416 ↗
33. 10.1088/1361-6528/ab283110.1088/1361-6528/ab2831 ↗
34. 10.1063/5.002095310.1063/5.0020953 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.physb.2019.41174310.1016/j.physb.2019.411743 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.sse.2019.10773010.1016/j.sse.2019.107730 ↗
37. 10.1002/adma.20180131810.1002/adma.201801318 ↗
38. 10.1002/aelm.20180022410.1002/aelm.201800224 ↗
39. 10.1002/adma.20190792910.1002/adma.201907929 ↗
40. 10.1038/nnano.2015.25210.1038/nnano.2015.252 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.502775910.1063/1.5027759 ↗
42. 10.1109/ted.2016.260421510.1109/ted.2016.2604215 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41928-018-0160-710.1038/s41928-018-0160-7 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41928-018-0131-z10.1038/s41928-018-0131-z ↗
45. 10.1038/nmat488610.1038/nmat4886 ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0077310.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00773 ↗
47. 10.1021/acsami.9b0012910.1021/acsami.9b00129 ↗
48. 10.1063/1.513005010.1063/1.5130050 ↗
49. Landau L. · Phys. Z. Sowjetunion · 1935 · 8 · 153
50. Gilbert T. L. · Phys. Rev. · 1955 · 100 · 1243
51. 10.1103/physrevlett.99.21720810.1103/physrevlett.99.217208 ↗
52. 10.1063/1.493745210.1063/1.4937452 ↗
53. 10.1063/1.475394710.1063/1.4753947 ↗
54. Donahue, M. J.; Donahue, M. OOMMF User’s Guide, version 1.0; US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1999.10.6028/NIST.IR.6376 ↗
55. 10.1109/led.2020.304329310.1109/led.2020.3043293 ↗