journal article·2019-06-05

Multimerization of an Alcohol Dehydrogenase by Fusion to a Designed Self-Assembling Protein Results in Enhanced Bioelectrocatalytic Operational Stability

Beyza Bulutoglu, Florika C. Macazo, Jacob Bale, Neil King, David Baker, Shelley D. Minteer, Scott Banta

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 11· Issue 22
Publisher page

Abstract

Proteins designed for supramolecular assembly provide a simple means to immobilize and organize enzymes for biotechnology applications. We have genetically fused the thermostable alcohol dehydrogenase D (AdhD) from Pyrococcus furiosus to a computationally designed cage-forming protein (O3-33). The trimeric form of the O3-33-AdhD fusion protein was most active in solution. The immobilization of the fusion protein on bioelectrodes leads to a doubling of the electrochemical operational stability as compared to the unfused control proteins. Thus, the fusion of enzymes to the designed self-assembling domains offers a simple strategy to increase the stability in biocatalytic systems.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization · Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials · Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, United States

Department of Chemistry, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States

Funding

Army Research Office · Air Force Office of Scientific Research

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.02.01410.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.02.014 ↗
2. 10.3390/catal806023810.3390/catal8060238 ↗
3. 10.3109/07388551.2014.95055010.3109/07388551.2014.950550 ↗
4. 10.1002/cbic.20150028010.1002/cbic.201500280 ↗
5. 10.1080/13102818.2015.100819210.1080/13102818.2015.1008192 ↗
6. 10.1007/s13205-012-0071-710.1007/s13205-012-0071-7 ↗
7. 10.1039/c3cs35506c10.1039/c3cs35506c ↗
8. 10.1002/bit.2513610.1002/bit.25136 ↗
9. 10.1007/s00253-014-5787-310.1007/s00253-014-5787-3 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0368810.1021/acsnano.5b03688 ↗
11. 10.1039/c1nr11132a10.1039/c1nr11132a ↗
12. 10.1002/anie.20100743310.1002/anie.201007433 ↗
13. 10.1038/nbt87410.1038/nbt874 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.123393610.1126/science.1233936 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0236810.1021/acsnano.7b02368 ↗
16. 10.1002/anie.20150841410.1002/anie.201508414 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.coche.2016.08.01610.1016/j.coche.2016.08.016 ↗
18. 10.1126/science.aaf881810.1126/science.aaf8818 ↗
19. 10.1073/pnas.160601311310.1073/pnas.1606013113 ↗
20. 10.1126/science.121936410.1126/science.1219364 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.copbio.2017.01.00110.1016/j.copbio.2017.01.001 ↗
22. Ma K. · J. Bacteriol. · 1999 · 4 · 116310.1128/JB.181.4.1163-1170.1999 ↗
23. 10.1128/aem.72.1.233-238.200610.1128/aem.72.1.233-238.2006 ↗
24. 10.1002/biot.20160015210.1002/biot.201600152 ↗
25. 10.1002/bit.2286910.1002/bit.22869 ↗
26. 10.1093/protein/gzs09510.1093/protein/gzs095 ↗
27. 10.1093/protein/gzx00910.1093/protein/gzx009 ↗
28. 10.1074/jbc.m110.16058010.1074/jbc.m110.160580 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.06.07510.1016/j.jmb.2009.06.075 ↗
30. 10.1039/b711564b10.1039/b711564b ↗
31. 10.1007/s12154-013-0102-910.1007/s12154-013-0102-9 ↗
32. 10.1039/c8cs00085a10.1039/c8cs00085a ↗
33. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.01710.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.017 ↗
34. 10.1039/c7cc05724e10.1039/c7cc05724e ↗
35. 10.3389/fbioe.2014.0004510.3389/fbioe.2014.00045 ↗
36. 10.1038/ncomms136510.1038/ncomms1365 ↗
37. 10.1146/annurev-anchem-062011-14304910.1146/annurev-anchem-062011-143049 ↗
38. 10.1002/cphc.20140005810.1002/cphc.201400058 ↗
39. 10.1021/ac302132810.1021/ac3021328 ↗
40. 10.1039/c2cc16156g10.1039/c2cc16156g ↗
41. 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.10.08010.1016/j.electacta.2004.10.080 ↗
42. 10.1149/2.087404jes10.1149/2.087404jes ↗
43. 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2009.04.00810.1016/j.bioelechem.2009.04.008 ↗
44. 10.1021/cr020719k10.1021/cr020719k ↗
45. 10.1557/mrc.2011.1210.1557/mrc.2011.12 ↗