journal article·2019-12-26

Accelerated Stress Test Method for the Assessment of Membrane Lifetime in Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries

Fabio J. Oldenburg, Ayoub Ouarga, Thomas Justus Schmidt, Lorenz Gubler

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 11· Issue 51
Publisher page

Abstract

An accelerated stress test (AST) method was developed to estimate the lifetime of ion-exchange membranes in a vanadium redox flow battery. The oxidative VO2+ ions present in the charged positive electrolyte are the predominant stressor causing loss of functional groups and membrane conductivity. Membrane aging was accelerated in ex situ tests by exploiting elevated temperatures and the increased oxidative strength of Ce4+. Acceleration factors were determined on the basis of the analysis of aged radiation grafted g(S-AN) membranes. The degradation in a Ce4+ solution was found to be ∼4 times faster than in VO2+. The highest acceleration factor of ∼200 was found for the degradation with Ce4+ at 80 °C. The degradation reaction present in the accelerated stress test showed a similar activation energy of ∼50 kJ/mol in VO2+ and Ce4+ solutions, suggesting a similar reaction pathway. The applicability of the test was further evaluated with the second membrane, g(AMS-MAN). Its lifetime was estimated based on the accelerated stress test and acceleration factors previously determined for the g(S-AN) membrane and compared to the lifetime projected from an extended cycling experiment in the cell. The two values were in the same range of ∼4000 h. The proposed AST can serve as a basis for predictive modeling of membrane lifetime in vanadium redox flow batteries. The potential of the method and the limitations are discussed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Electrochemistry Laboratory, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland

Materials Science and Nanoengineering Department, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, 43150 Ben Guerir, Morocco

Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, LAGEP-UMR 5007, 69622 Lyon, France

Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland

Funding

Bundesamt f?r Energie · Innosuisse - Schweizerische Agentur f?r Innovationsf?rderung · Material Science and Nano-Engineering Department, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Bloomberg New Energy Finance. New Energy Outlook 2018, https://bnef.turtl.co/story/neo2018, 10.01.2019.
2. BP Technology Outlook 2018, https://www.bp.com/technologyoutlook2018, 10.01.2019.
3. International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/tcep/energyintegration/energystorage/, 10.01.2019.
4. Lazard. Lazard’s Levelized Cost of Storage Analysis - Version 4.0, https://www.lazard.com/media/450774/lazards-levelized-cost-of-storage-version-40-vfinal.pdf, 10.01.2019.
5. 10.1021/cr500720t10.1021/cr500720t ↗
6. Wang W. · 2012
7. 10.1149/1.359956510.1149/1.3599565 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.est.8b0207310.1021/acs.est.8b02073 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.06610.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.066 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.05810.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.058 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.55583910.1063/1.555839 ↗
12. 10.1039/C5RA26244E10.1039/C5RA26244E ↗
13. 10.1149/2.0201601jes10.1149/2.0201601jes ↗
14. 10.1039/b718526j10.1039/b718526j ↗
15. 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.09.02510.1016/j.memsci.2017.09.025 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.6b0778210.1021/acsami.6b07782 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.09.01210.1016/j.memsci.2016.09.012 ↗
18. 10.1039/C8RA03921F10.1039/C8RA03921F ↗
19. Ünlu, M.; Raiford, M.; Yang, R. Nafion(Tm) Membranes for Vanadium Flow Battery. Proc. The International Flow Battery Forum; Lausanne, Switzerland, July 10−12, 2018, pp 128–129.
20. 10.2172/142251610.2172/1422516 ↗
21. 10.1149/2.0441613jes10.1149/2.0441613jes ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b1254010.1021/acs.jpcc.6b12540 ↗
23. 10.1002/cssc.20170061010.1002/cssc.201700610 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.6b0305010.1021/acsami.6b03050 ↗
25. Cowie J. M. G. · 1991
26. 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.03410.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.034 ↗
27. Gubler, L. Radiation Grafted Membranes for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells; Habilitation Thesis, ETH Zürich: 2016, Chapter II, pp. 109.
28. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.04310.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.043 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.06.04010.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.06.040 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.05110.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.051 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.02510.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.025 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.04010.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.040 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.02.00910.1016/j.memsci.2009.02.009 ↗
34. 10.1039/c3cp52035h10.1039/c3cp52035h ↗
35. 10.1002/cssc.20110006810.1002/cssc.201100068 ↗
36. 10.1002/fuce.20150001910.1002/fuce.201500019 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.00910.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.009 ↗
38. Nelson W. · 199010.1002/9780470316795 ↗
39. 10.1149/05801.0955ecst10.1149/05801.0955ecst ↗
40. Kreuer K. D. · 2003
41. 10.1021/cr050182l10.1021/cr050182l ↗