journal article·2017-07-19Open access

Surface PEG Grafting Density Determines Magnetic Relaxation Properties of Gd-Loaded Porous Nanoparticles for MR Imaging Applications

Wuyuan Zhang, Jonathan Martinelli, Joop A. Peters, Jacob M.A. van Hengst, Hans Bouwmeester, Evelien Kramer, Célia S. Bonnet, Frédéric Szeremeta, Éva Tóth, Kristina Djanashvili

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Surface PEGylation of nanoparticles designed for biomedical applications is a common and straightforward way to stabilize the materials for in vivo administration and to increase their circulation time. This strategy becomes less trivial when MRI active porous nanomaterials are concerned as their function relies on water/proton-exchange between the pores and bulk water. Here we present a comprehensive study on the effects of PEGylation on the relaxometric properties of nanozeolite LTL (dimensions of 20 × 40 nm) ion-exchanged with paramagnetic Gd III ions. We evidence that as long as the surface grafting density of the PEG chains does not exceed the “mushroom” regime (conjugation of up to 6.2 wt % of PEG), Gd-LTL retains a remarkable longitudinal relaxivity (38 s –1 mM –1 at 7 T and 25 °C) as well as the pH-dependence of the longitudinal and transverse relaxation times. At higher PEG content, the more compact PEG layer (brush regime) limits proton/water diffusion and exchange between the interior of LTL and the bulk, with detrimental consequences on relaxivity. Furthermore, PEGylation of Gd-LTL dramatically decreases the leakage of toxic Gd III ions in biological media and in the presence of competing anions, which together with minimal cytotoxicity renders these materials promising probes for MRI applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes · Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications · Covalent Organic Framework Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Van der Maasweg 9, 2629HZ Delft, The Netherlands

RIKILT Wageningen Research, Akkermaalsbos 2, 6708WB Wageningen, The Netherlands

Division of Toxicology, Wageningen University, Stippeneng 4, 6708WE Wageningen, The Netherlands

Centre de Biophysique Moléculaire, CNRS, Rue Charles Sadron, 45071 Orléans Cedex 2, France

Le Studium, Loire Valley Institute for Advanced Studies, 1 Rue Dupanloup, 45000 Orléans, France

Funding

Ministerie van Economische Zaken · China Scholarship Council · Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/cr400425h10.1021/cr400425h ↗
2. 10.1039/c3cs60149h10.1039/c3cs60149h ↗
3. 10.1126/science.124739010.1126/science.1247390 ↗
4. 10.2174/156802661131304000310.2174/1568026611313040003 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.122633810.1126/science.1226338 ↗
6. 10.1002/anie.20110144710.1002/anie.201101447 ↗
7. 10.1002/anie.20100789410.1002/anie.201007894 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20140229610.1002/adma.201402296 ↗
9. 10.1021/ar200032710.1021/ar2000327 ↗
10. 10.1021/bc500536y10.1021/bc500536y ↗
11. 10.1002/adhm.20120026210.1002/adhm.201200262 ↗
12. 10.1021/ja710193c10.1021/ja710193c ↗
13. 10.1002/chem.20130063510.1002/chem.201300635 ↗
14. 10.1039/C4TB01423E10.1039/C4TB01423E ↗
15. 10.1002/ejic.20110119510.1002/ejic.201101195 ↗
16. 10.1021/cm800618310.1021/cm8006183 ↗
17. 10.1002/chem.20130445710.1002/chem.201304457 ↗
18. Toth, E.; Helm, L.; Merbach, A.InRelaxivity of Gadolinium(III) Complexes: Theory and Mechanism;John Wiley & Sons:New York, 2013; Chapter 2, pp25–81.10.1002/9781118503652.ch2 ↗
19. 10.1021/jp510656d10.1021/jp510656d ↗
20. Tannock I. F. · Cancer Res. · 1989 · 49 · 4373
21. 10.1039/C4NR05781C10.1039/C4NR05781C ↗
22. 10.2217/nnm.11.1910.2217/nnm.11.19 ↗
23. 10.1039/C4RA10103K10.1039/C4RA10103K ↗
24. 10.1039/CS996250018710.1039/CS9962500187 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0168-3659(02)00178-510.1016/S0168-3659(02)00178-5 ↗
26. 10.1038/sj.gt.330090010.1038/sj.gt.3300900 ↗
27. 10.1021/bc025529v10.1021/bc025529v ↗
28. 10.1021/cm102827y10.1021/cm102827y ↗
29. 10.1039/C5CP00552C10.1039/C5CP00552C ↗
30. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.04610.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.046 ↗
31. 10.1002/mrc.92210.1002/mrc.922 ↗
32. 10.1021/nl302638g10.1021/nl302638g ↗
33. 10.1021/la904150210.1021/la9041502 ↗
34. 10.1016/0001-8686(87)85003-010.1016/0001-8686(87)85003-0 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0005-2736(03)00197-410.1016/S0005-2736(03)00197-4 ↗
36. 10.1038/353239a010.1038/353239a0 ↗
37. Deryagin B. · Acta Physicochim. · 1941 · 14 · 633
38. 10.1007/BF0151175210.1007/BF01511752 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.10.02510.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.10.025 ↗
40. 10.1529/biophysj.104.04544310.1529/biophysj.104.045443 ↗
41. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00004-110.1016/S0142-9612(00)00004-1 ↗
42. 10.1002/1521-3765(20021115)8:22<5121::AID-CHEM5121>3.0.CO;2-W10.1002/1521-3765(20021115)8:22<5121::AID-CHEM5121>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
43. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.03.02710.1016/j.micromeso.2013.03.027 ↗
44. 10.1002/cmmi.167710.1002/cmmi.1677 ↗
45. 10.1002/cmmi.11010.1002/cmmi.110 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2011.01.01710.1016/j.jbiosc.2011.01.017 ↗
47. 10.1039/c3tx50023c10.1039/c3tx50023c ↗
48. 10.1186/s11671-016-1334-810.1186/s11671-016-1334-8 ↗
49. 10.1063/1.166969910.1063/1.1669699 ↗
50. 10.1063/1.171629610.1063/1.1716296 ↗