journal article·2018-10-10Open access

A Handwriting Method for Low-Cost Gas Sensors

Florin C. Loghin, Aniello Falco, Andreas Albrecht, José F. Salmerón, Markus Becherer, Paolo Lugli, Almudena Rivandeneyra

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 10· Issue 40

Abstract

In this study, we report on an automated method based on a handwritten technique for the fabrication of low-cost gas sensors based on carbon nanotube (CNT) networks. Taking advantage of the inherent low-cost, flexible, and uncomplicated characteristics of pen-based techniques and combining them with an automated robotic system allows for high-resolution patterns, high reproducibility, and relatively high throughput considering the limitations of parallel processing. To showcase this, gas sensors capable of sensing NH3, CO2, CO, and ethanol, as well as temperature and relative humidity, are fabricated and characterized displaying competitive performance in relation to previously reported devices. The presented process is compatible with a variety of solutions and inks and, as such, allows for an easy integration into existing printing and coating frameworks with the greatest advantage being the ease of creating prototypes because of the nonstringent material requirements.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute for Nanoelectronics, Technische Universität München, 80333 Munich, Germany

Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, 39100 Bozen-Bolzano, Italy

Funding

Graduate School, Technische Universit?t M?nchen

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Chui M. · McKinsey Quarterly · 2010 · 2 · 1
2. 10.3390/s15102676910.3390/s151026769 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.08.00110.1016/j.mattod.2015.08.001 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.sna.2016.03.02310.1016/j.sna.2016.03.023 ↗
5. 10.1088/2058-8585/aa5eeb10.1088/2058-8585/aa5eeb ↗
6. Suganuma K. · 2014 · 7410.1007/978-1-4614-9625-0 ↗
7. 10.1021/cm010163210.1021/cm0101632 ↗
8. 10.1109/JPROC.2005.85030410.1109/JPROC.2005.850304 ↗
9. 10.1088/0957-4484/16/10/07410.1088/0957-4484/16/10/074 ↗
10. Kawahara, Y.; Hodges, S.; Cook, B. S.; Zhang, C.; Abowd, G. D. In Instant Inkjet Circuits: Lab-Based Inkjet Printing to Support Rapid Prototyping of UbiComp Devices, Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing; ACM, 2013; pp 363–372.10.1145/2493432.2493486 ↗
11. 10.3390/nano303045310.3390/nano3030453 ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20150340510.1002/adfm.201503405 ↗
13. 10.1002/elan.20130037410.1002/elan.201300374 ↗
14. 10.1039/c3cp50675d10.1039/c3cp50675d ↗
15. 10.1073/pnas.130725111010.1073/pnas.1307251110 ↗
16. 10.1039/C4LC00864B10.1039/C4LC00864B ↗
17. 10.1039/C5LC00297D10.1039/C5LC00297D ↗
18. 10.1002/anie.20120606910.1002/anie.201206069 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2013.10.04810.1016/j.materresbull.2013.10.048 ↗
20. 10.1002/adhm.20140080810.1002/adhm.201400808 ↗
21. Su, J.J.; Beardslee, L.; Brand, O. In Combined Chemoresistive and Chemocapacitive Microsensor Structures, Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (Transducers & Eurosensors XXVII), 2013 Transducers & Eurosensors XXVII: The 17th International Conference; IEEE, 2013; pp 258–261.10.1109/Transducers.2013.6626751 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.snb.2014.02.07810.1016/j.snb.2014.02.078 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.snb.2012.10.00510.1016/j.snb.2012.10.005 ↗
24. 10.1109/JSEN.2016.260641510.1109/JSEN.2016.2606415 ↗
25. 10.1002/bit.2033710.1002/bit.20337 ↗
26. 10.1149/2.0331705jss10.1149/2.0331705jss ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.7b0370210.1021/acsami.7b03702 ↗
28. 10.1021/acssensors.6b0000510.1021/acssensors.6b00005 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.02.04910.1016/j.matlet.2014.02.049 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.sna.2014.12.02310.1016/j.sna.2014.12.023 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.01.13210.1016/j.snb.2017.01.132 ↗
32. 10.1002/cplu.20160047810.1002/cplu.201600478 ↗
33. Hester, J. G.; Tentzeris, M. M.; Fang, Y. In Inkjet-Printed, Flexible, High Performance, Carbon Nanomaterial Based Sensors for Ammonia and DMMP Gas Detection, Microwave Conference (EuMC), 2015 European; IEEE, 2015; pp 857–860.10.1109/EuMC.2015.7345899 ↗
34. 10.5194/jsss-3-349-201410.5194/jsss-3-349-2014 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.snb.2015.06.13810.1016/j.snb.2015.06.138 ↗
36. 10.5772/5217310.5772/52173 ↗
37. Abdelhalim, A.; Falco, A.; Loghin, F.; Lugli, P.; Salmerón, J. F.; Rivadeneyra, A. In Flexible NH3 sensor based on spray deposition and inkjet printing, IEEE Sensors2016; IEEE, 2016; pp 1–3.10.1109/ICSENS.2016.7808437 ↗
38. Falco, A.; Salmerón, J.; Loghin, F.; Abdelhalim, A.; Lugli, P.; Rivadeneyra, A. In Optimization of Process Parameters for Inkjet Printing of CNT Random Networks on Flexible Substrates, Nanotechnology (IEEE-NANO), 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on; IEEE, 2016; pp 487–490.10.1109/NANO.2016.7751520 ↗
39. 10.1039/C6TC00628K10.1039/C6TC00628K ↗
40. 10.1039/C7TA11311K10.1039/C7TA11311K ↗
41. 10.1109/JSEN.2013.226577510.1109/JSEN.2013.2265775 ↗
42. 10.1109/TNANO.2015.251096510.1109/TNANO.2015.2510965 ↗
43. 10.1109/TED.2015.250410510.1109/TED.2015.2504105 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.04.00910.1016/j.tsf.2009.04.009 ↗
45. 10.1021/jp064371z10.1021/jp064371z ↗
46. 10.1007/s00542-013-1943-410.1007/s00542-013-1943-4 ↗
47. 10.1021/acsami.7b0518110.1021/acsami.7b05181 ↗
48. Honda, W.; Harada, S.; Arie, T.; Akita, S.; Takei, K. In Printed Wearable Temperature Sensor for Health Monitoring, IEEE SENSORS 2014 Proceedings; IEEE, 2014; pp 2227–2229.10.1109/ICSENS.2014.6985483 ↗