Nanotextured Polymer Substrate for Flexible and Mechanically Robust Metal Electrodes by Nanoimprint Lithography
Source abstract
Abstract
Metal thin film electrodes on flexible polymer substrates are inherently unstable against humidity and mechanical stresses because of their poor adhesion properties. We introduce a novel approach for improving the adhesion characteristics of metal-polymer interface based on the nanostructuring of the polymer substrate by using nanoimprint lithography. The adhesion characteristics of metal-polymer interface were measured by accelerated test, cyclic bending test and double cantilever beam (DCB) test. The interface of Au/Ti dual layer thin film and nanoimprinted PMMA substrate shows over 2.03 and 1.95 times higher adhesion energy (G(c)) than that of Au/Ti dual layer thin film and plane PMMA substrate in air and wet environments, respectively. The adhesion energy between metal thin film and polymer substrate was dramatically improved by the increased surface roughness and mechanical interlocking effect of numerous nanoscale anchors at the edges of nanoimprinted surface, which was verified by both experiment and numerical analysis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Surface Technology R&D Group, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology (KITECH), Incheon 406-840, Korea
Department of Nano Manufacturing Technology, Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials (KIMM), Daejeon 305-343, Korea
Funding
Ministry of Strategy and Finance · Korea Institute of Materials Science · Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20140419210.1002/adma.201404192 ↗
2. 10.1021/nn204009m10.1021/nn204009m ↗
3. 10.1039/C4NR03295K10.1039/C4NR03295K ↗
4. 10.1021/am200958510.1021/am2009585 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.06.04510.1016/j.carbon.2009.06.045 ↗
6. 10.1021/nn405887k10.1021/nn405887k ↗
7. 10.1088/0957-4484/23/28/28530110.1088/0957-4484/23/28/285301 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.356791710.1063/1.3567917 ↗
9. 10.1002/smll.20140099210.1002/smll.201400992 ↗
10. 10.1021/nn501204t10.1021/nn501204t ↗
11. 10.1088/0957-4484/26/37/37550110.1088/0957-4484/26/37/375501 ↗
12. 10.1021/nl072838r10.1021/nl072838r ↗
13. 10.1063/1.292477110.1063/1.2924771 ↗
14. 10.1088/0957-4484/23/48/48570410.1088/0957-4484/23/48/485704 ↗
15. 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00078-610.1016/S1359-6454(99)00078-6 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.142713910.1063/1.1427139 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0013-7944(98)00052-610.1016/S0013-7944(98)00052-6 ↗
18. 10.1038/ncomms352010.1038/ncomms3520 ↗
19. 10.1021/cm051532n10.1021/cm051532n ↗
20. 10.1021/nl301168r10.1021/nl301168r ↗
21. 10.1351/pac19926405071510.1351/pac199264050715 ↗
22. 10.1051/jp4:1993712010.1051/jp4:19937120 ↗
23. Lee J. H. · J. Korean Phys. Soc. · 2004 · 44 · 1177
24. 10.1007/s11664-002-0120-910.1007/s11664-002-0120-9 ↗
25. Harman G. G. · 1997
26. 10.1109/TADVP.2006.88477410.1109/TADVP.2006.884774 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.5b0290110.1021/acsami.5b02901 ↗
28. 10.1038/3019310.1038/30193 ↗
29. Kanninen M. F. · Int. J. Fract. · 1973 · 9 · 8310.1007/BF00035958 ↗
30. 10.1038/srep0291710.1038/srep02917 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01202-610.1016/S0257-8972(01)01202-6 ↗
32. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/12/12530410.1088/0957-4484/18/12/125304 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.05.02110.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.05.021 ↗
34. 10.1021/la048947s10.1021/la048947s ↗
35. 10.1021/am401921k10.1021/am401921k ↗
36. 10.1088/0022-3727/34/18/30710.1088/0022-3727/34/18/307 ↗
37. 10.1080/00218464.2013.73904210.1080/00218464.2013.739042 ↗