journal article·2013-11-13

How to Prepare the Brightest Luminescent Coatings?

Géraldine Dantelle, Blaise Fleury, Jean-Pierre Boilot, Thierry Gacoin

Publisher page

Abstract

We address here the question of studying the parameters affecting the brightness of luminescent nanoparticulate coatings, among which are the absorption rate, the internal quantum yield of the phosphor nanoparticles, and the extraction factor of the emitted light in a solid angle perpendicular to the substrate. Experimental investigations are achieved on spray-deposited YVO4:Eu particles, a system whose synthesis and properties are well documented so that particles of different sizes and microstructure can be considered. This allows a quantitative evaluation of the factors affecting film brightness. Considering a film made from raw colloidal particles, this work shows that its brightness is limited by a factor of 5 due to altered quantum yield of nanoparticles, a factor of 1.75 by dielectric effects and a factor of 2.4 by light extraction issues. This investigation, through providing quantitative evaluations of these different parameters, opens the way toward a possible rational design of inorganic luminescent coatings, with a possible improvement of brightness that could reach a factor of 30 as compared to simple films made directly from colloidal suspensions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials · Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · Photonic Crystals and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratoire de Physique de la Matière Condensée, UMR CNRS 7643 − Ecole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau Cedex, France

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Yum J. H. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2003 · 150 · H4710.1149/1.1535207 ↗
2. Wu H. · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 418110.1002/adma.200900638 ↗
3. Krummacher B. C. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 11350610.1063/1.2186080 ↗
4. Luo H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 86 · 24350510.1063/1.1949282 ↗
5. Im W.B. · Chem. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 284210.1021/cm100010z ↗
6. Yan B. · Opt. Mater. · 2007 · 29 · 54710.1016/j.optmat.2005.08.050 ↗
7. Burgin J. · J. Mater. Sci. · 2011 · 46 · 223510.1007/s10853-010-5062-7 ↗
8. Bauer E. · Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 470410.1002/adma.200800798 ↗
9. Ko K. Y. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 102 · 01350910.1063/1.2751402 ↗
10. Revaux A. · Nanotechnology · 2011 · 22 · 36570110.1088/0957-4484/22/36/365701 ↗
11. Huignard A. · Chem Mater. · 2000 · 12 · 109010.1021/cm990722t ↗
12. Huignard A. · J. Phys. Chem B · 2003 · 107 · 675410.1021/jp0342226 ↗
13. Capobianco J. A. · Chem. Phys. · 1997 · 214 · 32910.1016/S0301-0104(96)00318-7 ↗
14. Riwotzki K. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1998 · 102 · 1012910.1021/jp982293c ↗
15. Maurin I. · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2013 · 1 · 1310.1039/C2TC00127F ↗
16. Mialon G. · ACS Nano · 2008 · 2 · 250510.1021/nn8005784 ↗
17. Mialon G. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 1866910.1021/jp907176x ↗
18. Fleury B. · Langmuir · 2012 · 28 · 763910.1021/la300872m ↗
19. Deegan R. D. · Nature · 1997 · 389 · 82710.1038/39827 ↗
20. Yunker P. J. · Nature · 2011 · 476 · 30810.1038/nature10344 ↗
21. Meltzer R. S. · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter · 1999 · 60 · R1401210.1103/PhysRevB.60.R14012 ↗
22. Bermel P. · Opt. Express · 2007 · 15 · 1698610.1364/OE.15.016986 ↗
23. Lee S. · J. Disp. Technol. · 2013 · 9 · 49710.1109/JDT.2013.2240255 ↗