Interfacial Width in Polymer Bilayer Films Prepared by Double-Spin-Coating and Flotation Methods
Source abstract
Abstract
A spin-coating method with the aid of selective solvents has been used to construct multilayer structures for organic devices under the assumption that the solvents do not invade a preformed structure. To confirm the assumption, we examined the interfacial width (lambda(i)) of model polymer bilayers, composed of polystyrene and perdeuterated poly(methyl methacrylate), prepared by spin-coating and flotation methods. Neutron reflectivity measurements revealed that the lambda(i) value was larger for the spin-coating method than for the flotation method. These results cast doubt on the validity of the assumption. This knowledge should be kept in mind when this method is applied to construct multilayer structures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Block Copolymer Self-Assembly · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Applied Chemistry, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan, and Research Reactor Institute, Kyoto University, Osaka 590-0494, Japan
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Sirringhaus H. · Adv. Mater. · 2005 · 17 · 241110.1002/adma.200501152 ↗
2. Yan H. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2005 · 127 · 317210.1021/ja044455q ↗
3. Tseng S. R. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 15330810.1063/1.2999541 ↗
4. Hoppe H. · J. Mater. Res. · 2004 · 19 · 192410.1557/JMR.2004.0252 ↗
5. Lungenschmied C. · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2007 · 91 · 37910.1016/j.solmat.2006.10.013 ↗
6. Dimitrakopoulos C. D. · IBM J. Res. Dev. · 2001 · 45 · 1110.1147/rd.451.0011 ↗
7. Fujii Y. · J. Phys. Conf. Ser. · 2007 · 83 · 01202310.1088/1742-6596/83/1/012023 ↗
8. Tanaka K. · Langmuir · 2008 · 24 · 29610.1021/la702132t ↗
9. Fernandez M. L. · Polymer · 1988 · 29 · 192310.1016/0032-3861(88)90162-0 ↗
10. Anastasiadis S. H. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1990 · 92 · 567710.1063/1.458499 ↗
11. Schubert D. W. · Europhys. Lett. · 1996 · 35 · 41910.1209/epl/i1996-00130-3 ↗
12. Sferrazza M. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 78 · 369310.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3693 ↗
13. Brandrup J.
14. Ebisawa T. · Physica B · 1995 · 213 · 90110.1016/0921-4526(95)00318-4 ↗
15. http://www.hmi.de/bensc/instrumentation/instrumente/v6/refl/parratt_en.htm.
16. Helfand E. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1972 · 56 · 359210.1063/1.1677735 ↗
17. As discussed in ref9, the authors in ref8calculated the interfacial thickness in terms of the Debye−Waller factor in the reflectivity equation as 2 nm. The value corresponds to 5 nm in real space after taking into account a factor of (2π)1/2.
18. Russell T. P. · Macromolecules · 1993 · 26 · 581910.1021/ma00073a044 ↗
19. Fredrickson G. H. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1987 · 87 · 697–10.1063/1.453566 ↗
20. Ballard D. G. H. · Eur. Polym. J. · 1973 · 9 · 96510.1016/0014-3057(73)90059-1 ↗
21. Kirste R. G. · Z. Phys. Chem. · 1962 · 31 · 36310.1524/zpch.1962.31.5_6.363 ↗
22. Kirste R. G. · Makromol. Chem. · 1967 · 101 · 9110.1002/macp.1967.021010106 ↗
23. Fetters L. J. · Macromolecules · 1994 · 27 · 463910.1021/ma00095a001 ↗