High-Throughput Screening of Experimental Metal–organic Frameworks for High Water Content Syngas Hydrogen Purification under Pressure Swing Adsorption Conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are promising sorbents for adsorption-based hydrogen (H 2 ) purification in blue hydrogen process, but existing large-scale computational screenings rarely examine adsorption performances of MOFs under elevated pressure, temperature and high water content, which is typical of industrial hydrogen-rich syngas. In this work, we perform a high-throughput virtual screening of 11,334 porous experimental MOFs to identify candidates for pressure swing adsorption (PSA)-based H 2 purification from syngas under a range of realistic dry and wet conditions. Grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations are carried out for five-component dry syngas (H 2 /CO 2 /CO/CH 4 /N 2 ) at three temperatures (30–70 °C) and five pressures (1–30 bar); 1080 Pareto-optimal MOFs are selected based on nondominated sorting of CO 2, CO, and CH 4 working capacities under all 15 conditions from the dry simulations, without imposing arbitrary performance thresholds. Under targeted dry operating conditions (70 °C, adsorption at 30 bar and desorption at 1 bar), top materials exhibit CO 2 working capacities above 15 mmol/g and CO 2 /H 2 selectivities exceeding 1000, while maintaining appreciable adsorption for CO and CH 4 . Adsorption capabilities of the three carbon impurities for most MOFs are severely suppressed when 35 vol % H 2 O is introduced to the guest mixture in the wet simulations for the 1080 Pareto-optimal candidates; only seven MOFs retain measurable uptakes for all three carbon species, of which only four are considered thermal and water stable in the literature. Additional screening at 1 vol % H 2 O identifies 16 more MOFs with appreciable uptakes and literature validated thermal and water stability, yielding a set of 20 final candidates recommended for further investigations. Moreover, comparison to performance threshold selection methods highlights the versatility of Pareto-based candidate selection for discovering balanced MOF materials for hydrogen purification from syngas under realistic PSA conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Catalysts for Methane Reforming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Ottawa, 10 Marie Curie Private, Ottawa K1N 6N5, Canada
Natural Resources Canada, CanmetENERGY, 1 Haanel Dr., Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1M1, Canada
Funding
University of Ottawa · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · Natural Resources Canada
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.enconman.2023.11684010.1016/j.enconman.2023.116840 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.14710.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.147 ↗
3. 10.1039/D4CC05744A10.1039/D4CC05744A ↗
4. 10.1021/ja111411q10.1021/ja111411q ↗
5. 10.1002/anie.20191135910.1002/anie.201911359 ↗
6. 10.1002/anie.20120462110.1002/anie.201204621 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13843610.1016/j.cej.2022.138436 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.jced.9b0083510.1021/acs.jced.9b00835 ↗
9. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0102010.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01020 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0044110.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00441 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.8b1274610.1021/acsami.8b12746 ↗
12. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Hydrogen Production: Natural Gas Reforming . accessed 2025-08-28. https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/hydrogen-production-natural-gas-reforming.
13. 10.1021/acs.iecr.4c0090510.1021/acs.iecr.4c00905 ↗
14. 10.3389/fmats.2018.0000410.3389/fmats.2018.00004 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0074610.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00746 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.21338810.1016/j.ccr.2020.213388 ↗
17. 10.1162/evco.1994.2.3.22110.1162/evco.1994.2.3.221 ↗
18. 10.1109/4235.99601710.1109/4235.996017 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.2c1310010.1021/acsami.2c13100 ↗
20. 10.1039/D4SC07438F10.1039/D4SC07438F ↗
21. 10.1021/jacs.5c0491410.1021/jacs.5c04914 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c0248510.1021/acs.chemmater.2c02485 ↗
23. 10.1107/S205252061600395410.1107/S2052520616003954 ↗
24. Burner, J.; Luo, J.; White, A.; Mirmiran, A.; Kwon, O.; Boyd, P. G.; Maley, S.; Gibaldi, M.; Simrod, S.; Woo, T. K. Ab Initio REPEAT Charge MOF Database (ARC-MOF) .
25. Gibaldi, M.; Kapeliukha, A.; White, A.; Luo, J.; Mayo, R. A.; Burner, J.; Woo, T. K. MOSAEC MOF Database (MOSAEC-DB) .
26. 10.46793/match.87-3.529W10.46793/match.87-3.529W ↗
27. Widdowson D. E. · Adv. Neural. Inf. Process Syst. · 2022 · 35 · 24625
28. GitHub─uowoolab/FastMC . https://github.com/uowoolab/FastMC (accessed 2025-05-08).
29. 10.1021/ja00051a04010.1021/ja00051a040 ↗
30. 10.1021/ct900340510.1021/ct9003405 ↗
31. 10.1021/ct800155q10.1021/ct800155q ↗
32. 10.1021/jp810871f10.1021/jp810871f ↗
33. 10.1021/jp211563e10.1021/jp211563e ↗
34. 10.1021/jp972543+10.1021/jp972543+ ↗
35. Provost B. · 2014
36. 10.1063/1.168307510.1063/1.1683075 ↗
37. 10.1021/i160057a01110.1021/i160057a011 ↗
38. 10.21105/joss.0233810.21105/joss.02338 ↗
39. Biscani, F.; Izzo, D.; Jakob, W.; GiacomoAcciarini; Märtens, M.; michiboo; Mereta, A.; Kaldemeyer, C.; Lyskov, S.; Corlay, S.; Looz, M. v.; Pritchard, B.; Patel, A.; López-Ibáñez, M.; Webb, O.; tmiasko; Mabille, J.; Acciarini, G.; Manani, K.; Huebl, A.; Biddulph, A.; jakirkham, h.; Lee, J.; Mambrini, A.; Doodle Leary, E.; Lema, F.; Nguyen, H.; Smirnov, I. Esa/Pagmo2: Pagmo 2.17.0 .
40. 10.1038/s41467-024-48136-010.1038/s41467-024-48136-0 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsaenm.3c0062210.1021/acsaenm.3c00622 ↗
42. 10.1039/B718456E10.1039/B718456E ↗
43. 10.1039/C0CC04085A10.1039/C0CC04085A ↗
44. 10.1039/C5DT02437D10.1039/C5DT02437D ↗
45. 10.1002/CHEM.20070181310.1002/CHEM.200701813 ↗
46. 10.1021/ja306391910.1021/ja3063919 ↗
47. 10.1039/C6QI00440G10.1039/C6QI00440G ↗
48. 10.1039/D0TA02033H10.1039/D0TA02033H ↗
49. 10.1039/B613047J10.1039/B613047J ↗
50. 10.1021/ic100916910.1021/ic1009169 ↗
51. 10.1038/nchem.73810.1038/nchem.738 ↗
52. 10.1021/ja802761z10.1021/ja802761z ↗
53. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.07.03810.1016/j.micromeso.2015.07.038 ↗
54. 10.1021/ja027697410.1021/ja0276974 ↗
55. 10.1021/ja512973b10.1021/ja512973b ↗
56. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c0255210.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c02552 ↗
57. 10.1021/ja906041f10.1021/ja906041f ↗
58. 10.1039/b909250a10.1039/b909250a ↗
59. 10.1038/s41586-019-1798-710.1038/s41586-019-1798-7 ↗
60. 10.1021/acsami.7b1803710.1021/acsami.7b18037 ↗
61. 10.1021/acsami.0c1233010.1021/acsami.0c12330 ↗
62. 10.1039/C5TA08984K10.1039/C5TA08984K ↗
63. 10.1016/j.rser.2023.11427510.1016/j.rser.2023.114275 ↗