Engineered Nanoliposomes to Mitigate Osteolytic Bone Lesions in Breast Cancer
Source abstract
Abstract
Despite advances in breast cancer therapy, its metastasis, particularly to bone, remains a significant challenge. Chemotherapeutic treatment with doxorubicin (DOX) elevates the circulating levels of TGF-β, potentially exacerbating bone metastasis. Moreover, DOX possesses several limitations, such as cardiotoxicity, rapid clearance, and multidrug resistance. Combinatorial therapy utilizing a (transforming growth factor) TGF-β inhibitor along with DOX could substantially reduce the metastatic burden. Baicalein (BAC), a key flavonoid, inhibits the TGF-β signaling pathway, potentially decreasing the bone metastatic ability of DOX. However, BAC is limited by poor solubility, low bioavailability, and a short half-life. Despite these challenges, a low combination index at a molar weight ratio of 1:4 (DOX:BAC) confirmed the synergistic potential of the combination. To deliver the ratiometric dose of both drugs, a PEGylated liposomal formulation loaded with DOX and BAC was developed using the ethanol injection method and evaluated for its anticancer and antimetastatic potential. The particle size of 132.53 ± 1.42 nm with narrow polydispersity and a ζ potential of -26.83 ± 2.2 mV were obtained for the developed nanoliposomes. The ratiometric combination loaded within the liposomal delivery carrier exhibited maximum synergistic activity in the syngeneic 4T1 BALB/c mice tumor model when administered intravenously through the tail vein. Moreover, the liposomal delivery vehicle showed a higher binding affinity toward hydroxyapatite, demonstrating selective bone accumulation. The results indicated efficient targetability and retention at the tumor site, as confirmed by pharmacokinetic profiling. Furthermore, micro-CT analysis revealed the preservation of bone architecture and minimal skeletal damage in treated groups. There was a 4.5-fold increase in the percent bone volume/total volume after treatment with nanoliposomes. These results highlight the promising therapeutic potential of combinatorial DOX and BAC delivery in the treatment of breast cancer-induced bone metastasis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone health and treatments · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Bone Metabolism and Diseases
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics
CSIR−Central Drug Research Institute
Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR)
Department of Chemistry
Stanford University
Division of Endocrinology
Division of Toxicology & Experimental Medicine
CSIR─Central Drug Research Institute
Funding
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India · Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3322/caac.2187110.3322/caac.21871 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsnano.4c0707410.1021/acsnano.4c07074 ↗
3. 10.1186/bcr278110.1186/bcr2781 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0826910.1021/acsnano.1c08269 ↗
5. 10.1007/s11914-023-00849-910.1007/s11914-023-00849-9 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10911-011-9217-110.1007/s10911-011-9217-1 ↗
7. 10.1371/journal.pone.007804310.1371/journal.pone.0078043 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0357310.1021/acsnano.2c03573 ↗
9. 10.1371/journal.pone.001036510.1371/journal.pone.0010365 ↗
10. 10.1080/10717544.2020.185622510.1080/10717544.2020.1856225 ↗
11. 10.2174/011389450135208124121109091110.2174/0113894501352081241211090911 ↗
12. 10.1002/smll.20100063110.1002/smll.201000631 ↗
13. 10.1517/17425247.5.8.83710.1517/17425247.5.8.837 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.02.03210.1016/j.bbrc.2015.02.032 ↗
15. 10.3892/mmr.2014.245210.3892/mmr.2014.2452 ↗
16. Zhao X. · Am. J. Cancer Res. · 2018 · 8 · 1528
17. 10.1186/s12951-024-02619-w10.1186/s12951-024-02619-w ↗
18. 10.1002/mabi.20230026810.1002/mabi.202300268 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cbi.2024.11103710.1016/j.cbi.2024.111037 ↗
20. 10.1007/s12274-024-6760-910.1007/s12274-024-6760-9 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.08.02410.1016/j.jconrel.2017.08.024 ↗
22. 10.1080/17425247.2020.181371410.1080/17425247.2020.1813714 ↗
23. 10.3390/cancers1102022210.3390/cancers11020222 ↗
24. 10.1080/17425247.2024.235198710.1080/17425247.2024.2351987 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.12057110.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120571 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsnano.3c1206410.1021/acsnano.3c12064 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsnano.4c1586010.1021/acsnano.4c15860 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.canlet.2009.11.00310.1016/j.canlet.2009.11.003 ↗
29. Sun Y. · Am. J. Cancer Res. · 2015 · 6 · 114
30. 10.1111/bjd.1410810.1111/bjd.14108 ↗
31. 10.4103/1735-5362.21397910.4103/1735-5362.213979 ↗
32. 10.1021/la702096310.1021/la7020963 ↗
33. 10.1016/0005-2736(93)90105-910.1016/0005-2736(93)90105-9 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.msec.2020.11153710.1016/j.msec.2020.111537 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jddst.2020.10217410.1016/j.jddst.2020.102174 ↗
36. 10.1016/0005-2736(90)90091-210.1016/0005-2736(90)90091-2 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jpba.2023.11575110.1016/j.jpba.2023.115751 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.13668010.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136680 ↗
39. 10.3390/membranes1009022210.3390/membranes10090222 ↗
40. 10.3390/molecules2622698810.3390/molecules26226988 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.tca.2021.17899310.1016/j.tca.2021.178993 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.12341410.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123414 ↗
43. 10.1002/sscp.7004710.1002/sscp.70047 ↗
44. 10.2217/nnm-2022-026810.2217/nnm-2022-0268 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.12320910.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123209 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.12202210.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122022 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.06.00910.1016/j.jconrel.2024.06.009 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.06810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.068 ↗
49. 10.1021/acsnano.3c1268710.1021/acsnano.3c12687 ↗
50. 10.1021/acsami.4c0143210.1021/acsami.4c01432 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.phymed.2021.15348410.1016/j.phymed.2021.153484 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.10110.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.101 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.07.01610.1016/j.actbio.2021.07.016 ↗
54. 10.1002/smll.20200767210.1002/smll.202007672 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.02.00510.1016/j.actbio.2016.02.005 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.12.08410.1016/j.bbrc.2016.12.084 ↗
57. 10.1186/s13148-020-00827-310.1186/s13148-020-00827-3 ↗
58. 10.2147/OTT.S24849210.2147/OTT.S248492 ↗
59. 10.1021/acsnano.4c0697910.1021/acsnano.4c06979 ↗
60. 10.1021/acsnano.4c0726510.1021/acsnano.4c07265 ↗
61. Zhou L. · Am. J. Transl. Res. · 2020 · 12 · 5640
62. 10.7150/thno.4221810.7150/thno.42218 ↗
63. 10.1080/17435889.2024.239034810.1080/17435889.2024.2390348 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.jbo.2020.10029810.1016/j.jbo.2020.100298 ↗
65. 10.1023/A:100668971950510.1023/A:1006689719505 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.05.04510.1016/j.jconrel.2024.05.045 ↗
67. 10.1021/acsanm.2c0468710.1021/acsanm.2c04687 ↗
68. 10.1021/acsnano.5c0287410.1021/acsnano.5c02874 ↗
69. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0683510.1021/acsnano.3c06835 ↗
70. 10.1002/jbm.a.3746510.1002/jbm.a.37465 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.05.03710.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.05.037 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.13879110.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138791 ↗