Exceptional NH 3 Detection by Cu(cyhdc) MOF Sensor Due to H 2 O Coadsorption
Source abstract
Abstract
Metal–organic framework (MOF)-based electrical impedance sensors are a growing class of sensors that show utility in the detection of environmentally toxic gases. Detection of trace NH 3 has been particularly difficult to design due to the low electrical response of NH 3 . However, this has been circumvented by judiciously selecting a MOF that has enhanced electrical response to NH 3 due to coadsorption with predominant atmospheric gases such as water. Herein, an MOF Cu(cyhdc) based sensor has been successfully demonstrated for the enhanced detection of environmentally toxic NH 3 gas. The sensor shows a change in impedance when it is exposed to 5 ppm of NH 3 . At 20 °C, >30% relative humidity (RH) is necessary to elicit a change, with the response increasing with RH and reaching 3170× at 92% RH, producing the largest published response to NH 3 for a MOF direct electrical sensor. In the absence of water, no change is observed toward 5 ppm of NH 3 over 20–50 °C. This electrical response is largely driven by huge decreases in the imaginary component of the impedance, attributed to increased capacitance at the surface of the MOF crystallites upon NH 3 and H 2 O coadsorption. Complementary structural and microstructural characterization proves that the Cu(cyhdc) crystalline structure and morphology remain intact under trace NH 3 and/or H 2 O adsorption. Despite extremely low NH 3, loadings seen in TGA, XPS, and FT-IR confirm NH 3 and H 2 O adsorption, and changes to the metal-carboxylate IR peak positions are observed upon NH 3 adsorption. Concentrated primarily at the outer surfaces of the MOF crystallites, this NH 3 and H 2 O coadsorption effectively increases the surface capacitance across the Cu(cyhdc) powder and enables direct electrical detection of trace NH 3 . Together, these results demonstrate how coadsorption of specific molecules (H 2 O) can be used to enable the electrical detection of trace toxic gases that would otherwise not have produced a MOF sensor response.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Sandia National Laboratories
Funding
Office of Defense Programs
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/anie.20210625910.1002/anie.202106259 ↗
2. 10.1021/cr200324t10.1021/cr200324t ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.accounts.4c0031910.1021/acs.accounts.4c00319 ↗
4. 10.1021/ic301145810.1021/ic3011458 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41467-019-09157-210.1038/s41467-019-09157-2 ↗
6. 10.1021/acssensors.7b0001410.1021/acssensors.7b00014 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20220684210.1002/adma.202206842 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c0126610.1021/acs.iecr.1c01266 ↗
9. 10.1002/anie.20200640210.1002/anie.202006402 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10536910.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105369 ↗
11. 10.1039/C4CS00096J10.1039/C4CS00096J ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20200659810.1002/adfm.202006598 ↗
13. Hurlock, M. J.; Christian, M. S.; Small, L. J.; Percival, S. J.; Rademacher, D. X.; Schindelholz, M. E.; Nenoff, T. M. Enhanced Electrical NO 2 Detection Using Mixed Metal MOF-on-MOF Thin Film Sensors . In Review, 2024.
14. 10.1039/C7TA10538J10.1039/C7TA10538J ↗
15. 10.1002/anie.20160878010.1002/anie.201608780 ↗
16. 10.1021/jacs.8b1125710.1021/jacs.8b11257 ↗
17. 10.1021/acscentsci.9b0048210.1021/acscentsci.9b00482 ↗
18. 10.1002/anie.20211366510.1002/anie.202113665 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.7b1638110.1021/acsami.7b16381 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.9b0993810.1021/acsami.9b09938 ↗
21. 10.1021/accountsmr.4c0018310.1021/accountsmr.4c00183 ↗
22. 10.1021/jacs.0c1193010.1021/jacs.0c11930 ↗
23. 10.1002/anie.20180831610.1002/anie.201808316 ↗
24. 10.1039/d2cc01197b10.1039/d2cc01197b ↗
25. 10.1039/D4CC01449A10.1039/D4CC01449A ↗
26. 10.1021/jacs.1c0174910.1021/jacs.1c01749 ↗
27. 10.1002/anie.20221203210.1002/anie.202212032 ↗
28. 10.1002/anie.20201255210.1002/anie.202012552 ↗
29. 10.1021/jacs.2c0111710.1021/jacs.2c01117 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41586-022-05409-210.1038/s41586-022-05409-2 ↗
31. 10.1021/jacs.2c0095210.1021/jacs.2c00952 ↗
32. 10.1038/s42004-023-00850-410.1038/s42004-023-00850-4 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b0030710.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b00307 ↗
34. 10.1021/acscentsci.1c0037010.1021/acscentsci.1c00370 ↗
35. 10.1021/jacs.8b0031310.1021/jacs.8b00313 ↗
36. 10.1021/ja410547810.1021/ja4105478 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2022.11177010.1016/j.materresbull.2022.111770 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41467-023-42959-z10.1038/s41467-023-42959-z ↗
39. 10.1021/acsami.0c1842210.1021/acsami.0c18422 ↗
40. 10.1002/anie.20211151910.1002/anie.202111519 ↗
41. 10.1002/anie.20170955810.1002/anie.201709558 ↗
42. 10.1039/C5TA01738F10.1039/C5TA01738F ↗
43. 10.1002/anie.20190909610.1002/anie.201909096 ↗
44. Percival, S. J.; Small, L. J.; Nenoff, T. M.; Schindelholz, M. E.; Bachman, W. B.; Hurlock, M. Low Power MOF-based Sensor with Simple, Passive Gas Detection System. US Patent Application 63/450,260. 2/14/2024, 2024.
45. 10.1021/jacs.5b0960010.1021/jacs.5b09600 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsami.3c0686410.1021/acsami.3c06864 ↗
47. 10.1039/D4AN00520A10.1039/D4AN00520A ↗
48. 10.1021/acsami.1c1742910.1021/acsami.1c17429 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c0366410.1021/acs.analchem.0c03664 ↗
50. 10.1002/ange.20250735610.1002/ange.202507356 ↗
51. 10.1021/ic070167u10.1021/ic070167u ↗
52. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0048710.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00487 ↗
53. Bard A. J. · 2000
54. 10.1038/s41563-019-0598-710.1038/s41563-019-0598-7 ↗