journal article·2025-07-28

Enhanced C2H2/CO2 Separation in a Microporous Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Framework Bearing Phenyl Cyanide-Based Electronegative Channels

Yong Hoon Lee, Namju Kim, Hongryeol Yun, Hyojin Kim, Jong Hyeak Choe, Chang Seop Hong

Publisher page

Abstract

Separating acetylene (C 2 H 2 ) from carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) is challenging due to the similarities in their kinetic diameters and physical properties. Common methods, such as size sieving and binding affinity in hydrogen-bonded organic frameworks (HOFs), have been applied to address this issue. Here, we report on an HOF, KUF-5, which utilizes electronegative pore environments to selectively enhance C 2 H 2 affinity over CO 2 . KUF-5 features a three-dimensional structure with a pore size of 5.38 Å and exhibits an S-shaped isotherm, achieving a record-high C 2 H 2 /CO 2 uptake ratio of 4.8 at 273 K and 1 bar, showing a rare S-shaped curve for C 2 H 2 . Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis reveals a cyanide-based electronegative pore environment within KUF-5 that promotes multiple N···H–C hydrogen bonds and π–π interactions with C 2 H 2 molecules. Dispersion-corrected Density Functional Theory calculations indicate that the C 2 H 2 binding energy in KUF-5 is higher than that of CO 2 . Additionally, exposure tests under harsh conditions confirm the chemical stability of KUF-5, underscoring its robustness and potential for practical applications in C 2 H 2 /CO 2 separation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry

Korea University

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Weissermel, K.; Arpe, H.J. Acetylene. Industral Organic Chemistry, 1997; pp 90–104.10.1002/9783527616688.ch4 ↗
2. 10.1002/anie.20150383510.1002/anie.201503835 ↗
3. Pässler P. · 2011 · 1 · 277
4. 10.1039/C6EE01886F10.1039/C6EE01886F ↗
5. 10.1021/jp010826310.1021/jp0108263 ↗
6. 10.1039/D0CC04645K10.1039/D0CC04645K ↗
7. 10.1126/science.aaf245810.1126/science.aaf2458 ↗
8. 10.1038/ncomms832810.1038/ncomms8328 ↗
9. 10.1038/nchem.211410.1038/nchem.2114 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.112041110.1126/science.1120411 ↗
11. 10.1002/smll.20230364010.1002/smll.202303640 ↗
12. 10.1021/jacs.5b0564410.1021/jacs.5b05644 ↗
13. 10.1002/anie.20221583610.1002/anie.202215836 ↗
14. 10.1002/anie.20211585410.1002/anie.202115854 ↗
15. 10.1021/ja206601610.1021/ja2066016 ↗
16. 10.1002/anie.20141007710.1002/anie.201410077 ↗
17. 10.1038/ncomms613110.1038/ncomms6131 ↗
18. 10.1021/jacs.8b0286910.1021/jacs.8b02869 ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20221395910.1002/anie.202213959 ↗
20. 10.1002/anie.20210372910.1002/anie.202103729 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matt.2022.06.04310.1016/j.matt.2022.06.043 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41557-021-00740-z10.1038/s41557-021-00740-z ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13203310.1016/j.cej.2021.132033 ↗
24. 10.1002/smll.20220694510.1002/smll.202206945 ↗
25. 10.1039/D3TA04738E10.1039/D3TA04738E ↗
26. 10.1002/anie.20230857910.1002/anie.202308579 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.12434510.1016/j.seppur.2023.124345 ↗
28. 10.1002/anie.20250605510.1002/anie.202506055 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41467-022-33271-310.1038/s41467-022-33271-3 ↗
30. 10.1007/s13233-013-1148-910.1007/s13233-013-1148-9 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2014.05.03910.1016/j.jorganchem.2014.05.039 ↗
32. 10.1021/ic970348410.1021/ic9703484 ↗
33. 10.1039/D4SC07011A10.1039/D4SC07011A ↗
34. 10.1016/j.scib.2023.09.00810.1016/j.scib.2023.09.008 ↗
35. 10.1021/jacs.3c0613810.1021/jacs.3c06138 ↗
36. 10.1002/jcc.2049510.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
37. 10.1021/jacs.2c0530910.1021/jacs.2c05309 ↗