journal article·2026-03-11Open access

Morphological Optimization of the Active Layer from Film Formation Kinetics in Organic Solar Cells

Jinsheng Zhang, Peter Müller-Buschbaum

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide A deep understanding of the structural evolution is critical for the precise morphological optimization of the active layer in organic solar cells. This perspective systematically reviews the kinetic mechanisms of film formation and emphasizes that regulating processing parameters, such as deposition temperature, processing solvent, and additives, can effectively govern crystallization and phase separation during layer deposition. Advanced in situ characterization techniques are highlighted as indispensable tools for real-time decoding of these coupled kinetic pathways. We also summarize these techniques, covering their principles, detectable structural information, and inherent limitations and constraints, thereby guiding the selection of appropriate in situ tools. Finally, we outline the key challenges in the field and provide insights into future research aimed at advancing device performance through targeted morphological control.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Perovskite Materials and Applications · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Chair for Functional Materials, Department of Physics, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, James-Franck-Straße 1, 85748 Garching, Germany

Funding

Bayerisches Staatsministerium f?r Wissenschaft und Kunst · German Research Council (DFG) · Center for NanoScience (CeNS) · China Scholarship Council (CSC)

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/D2CE00718E10.1039/D2CE00718E ↗
2. 10.1039/C5TC03448E10.1039/C5TC03448E ↗
3. 10.1038/ncomms722910.1038/ncomms7229 ↗
4. 10.1002/adfm.20140339210.1002/adfm.201403392 ↗
5. 10.1002/adfm.20221053410.1002/adfm.202210534 ↗
6. 10.1039/D2TC02185D10.1039/D2TC02185D ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15863510.1016/j.cej.2024.158635 ↗
8. 10.1039/D4TC03741C10.1039/D4TC03741C ↗
9. 10.1002/solr.20230013610.1002/solr.202300136 ↗
10. Callister W. · 2013
11. 10.1002/aenm.20150158010.1002/aenm.201501580 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20200230210.1002/adma.202002302 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c0287210.1021/acs.macromol.0c02872 ↗
14. 10.1002/aenm.20240472410.1002/aenm.202404724 ↗
15. 10.1021/ja405493j10.1021/ja405493j ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20170711410.1002/adma.201707114 ↗
17. 10.1021/ma070712a10.1021/ma070712a ↗
18. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2025.11130110.1016/j.nanoen.2025.111301 ↗
19. 10.1002/aenm.20220016510.1002/aenm.202200165 ↗
20. 10.1002/adfm.20251434210.1002/adfm.202514342 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.0c1239010.1021/acsami.0c12390 ↗
22. 10.1002/aenm.20240316210.1002/aenm.202403162 ↗