Leveraging 3D Printing-Induced Spherulitic Topographical and Biochemical Cues on Polyether Ether Ketone/Hydroxyapatite/Magnesium Orthosilicate Composites for Orthopedic Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
A prime focus in orthopedic research is to promote osseointegration, while improving the functionality of implantable biomaterials. Surface topographic features have been shown to influence cell–biomaterial interactions, thereby facilitating cell adhesion, proliferation, and growth. However, a key challenge lies in inducing such topographical cues through existing biofabrication technologies. This study presents a newer strategy to leverage existing 3D printing (3DP) technology, promoting topographical cues manifested as microscopic spherulitic crystals integrated with nanoscopic lamellas on printed surfaces. Poly ether–ether–ketone (PEEK) composites reinforced with hydroxyapatite (HAp) and magnesium orthosilicate (Mg 2 SiO 4 ) are printed using droplet-based 3D printing (3DP) technology, wherein the printing parameters are tailored to induce a network of spherulitic topographical cues in conjunction with biochemical cues arising from exposed bioactive fillers. Human osteosarcoma (Saos-2) cells are used to investigate the synergistic influence of the topographical and biochemical cues on the cell–material biological interactions. The composites exhibit hydrophilic surfaces with enhanced surface energy, promoting cellular adhesion and the formation of numerous filopodia, indicating an active engagement with spherulitic topographies. Composite surfaces featuring spherulitic topographical and biochemical cues foster a conducive environment, augmenting the cytocompatibility and osteogenic capabilities. Furthermore, process optimization not only improves the mechanical performance of the composites but also enhances their damping capabilities, a critical attribute for implant applications. This approach demonstrates that engineered spherulitic-topographical cues, in conjunction with biochemical cues, can mimic lamellar bone morphology, yielding improved biological and dynamic mechanical responses and highlighting their potential for personalized orthopedic implant applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine
National University of Singapore
Department of Radiation Oncology
National University Cancer Institute
Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Design and Engineering
Department of Diagnostic Imaging
National University Hospital
NUS Centre for Additive Manufacturing (AM.NUS)
National University Spine Institute, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Funding
National Medical Research Council · National Additive Manufacturing Innovation Cluster
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c0026210.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c00262 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsomega.4c0092310.1021/acsomega.4c00923 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2025.13108810.1016/j.matchemphys.2025.131088 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.21417010.1016/j.bioadv.2024.214170 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0119310.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01193 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c0143410.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01434 ↗
7. Yu T. · ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering · 2025
8. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0114810.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01148 ↗
9. 10.3390/polym1714196810.3390/polym17141968 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c0088110.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00881 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matdes.2025.11371610.1016/j.matdes.2025.113716 ↗
12. 10.3390/cells1308065610.3390/cells13080656 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41598-017-00571-410.1038/s41598-017-00571-4 ↗
14. 10.1039/D2TB01142E10.1039/D2TB01142E ↗
15. 10.3390/polym1424552610.3390/polym14245526 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.9b0303010.1021/acsami.9b03030 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.11215110.1016/j.matdes.2023.112151 ↗
18. 10.1002/app.5284710.1002/app.52847 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.11.03010.1016/j.actbio.2012.11.030 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.9b1605010.1021/acsami.9b16050 ↗
21. 10.1089/ten.tea.2007.027010.1089/ten.tea.2007.0270 ↗
22. 10.1021/la205162d10.1021/la205162d ↗
23. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.03.02410.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.03.024 ↗
24. Kahla, R. B.; Barkaoui, A. Bone remodeling process: mechanics, biology, and numerical modeling; Academic Press, 2021.10.1016/B978-0-323-88467-9.00002-3 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.4c1284710.1021/acsami.4c12847 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.00210.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.002 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.05.02510.1016/j.jmapro.2022.05.025 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.msec.2021.11196710.1016/j.msec.2021.111967 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsapm.2c0128810.1021/acsapm.2c01288 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.13513410.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.135134 ↗
31. Jeyachandran P. · Journal of Materials Research and Technology · 2025
32. 10.1007/s00586-023-07734-010.1007/s00586-023-07734-0 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c0132610.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01326 ↗
34. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau067010.1126/scitranslmed.aau0670 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c0107210.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01072 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsabm.3c0038310.1021/acsabm.3c00383 ↗
37. 10.1242/jeb.17794910.1242/jeb.177949 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10896610.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108966 ↗
39. 10.1002/ame2.1216310.1002/ame2.12163 ↗
40. 10.1039/D2TB01875F10.1039/D2TB01875F ↗
41. 10.1021/acsami.5c0918110.1021/acsami.5c09181 ↗
42. 10.1002/anbr.20210006810.1002/anbr.202100068 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.12.02510.1016/j.actbio.2023.12.025 ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0331310.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03313 ↗
45. 10.3390/ma1107125710.3390/ma11071257 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0425710.1021/acsomega.0c04257 ↗
47. 10.1021/acsami.1c1983410.1021/acsami.1c19834 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.21404310.1016/j.bioadv.2024.214043 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.10383010.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103830 ↗
50. 10.1007/s42247-024-00909-510.1007/s42247-024-00909-5 ↗
51. 10.1108/RPJ-07-2024-028610.1108/RPJ-07-2024-0286 ↗
52. 10.1002/adhm.20200202010.1002/adhm.202002020 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.10.01510.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.10.015 ↗
54. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c0072510.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c00725 ↗
55. 10.1186/s12951-025-03272-710.1186/s12951-025-03272-7 ↗
56. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0142510.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01425 ↗
57. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0099110.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00991 ↗
58. 10.1021/acsapm.3c0117410.1021/acsapm.3c01174 ↗
59. 10.1002/adhm.20240399210.1002/adhm.202403992 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.08.00110.1016/j.actbio.2024.08.001 ↗
61. 10.1021/acsami.5c0252610.1021/acsami.5c02526 ↗
62. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c0074410.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00744 ↗
63. 10.1021/acsami.2c2071110.1021/acsami.2c20711 ↗
64. 10.1021/am502692k10.1021/am502692k ↗
65. 10.1021/am504409q10.1021/am504409q ↗
66. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.10848310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108483 ↗
67. 10.1021/acsaenm.4c0021710.1021/acsaenm.4c00217 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.11291510.1016/j.commatsci.2024.112915 ↗
69. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c0135210.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01352 ↗
70. Breitenstein P. · Acta Biomaterialia · 2025