journal article·2026-02-04

Mechanistic Insights into the Competitive Adsorption–Desorption of Volatile Organic Compounds in Mesoporous Matrices

Nirmalay Barua, Isabelle L. Williams, Tanya Hutter

Publisher page

Abstract

Volatile organic compound (VOC) adsorption in porous materials is primarily governed by surface interactions and capillary forces and becomes further complicated when multiple compounds compete for the same adsorption sites. Since VOC emissions are multicomponent, it is imperative to understand the competitive nature of multiple VOCs adsorbing and desorbing in a porous adsorbent. This study explores real-time adsorption–desorption of polar ethanol and nonpolar heptane in 40 μm thick mesoporous silicon (p-Si) and silica (p-SiO 2 ) membranes, using in-situ transmission Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The surface areas for the p-Si and p-SiO 2 membranes are 211 and 154 m 2 g –1, respectively. All single-component and multicomponent sorption studies were conducted under dynamic flow conditions. Single-component sorption kinetics were fitted to pseudo-first- and pseudo-second-order models and equilibrium adsorption capacities to the Freundlich isotherm. Overlapping IR bands (CH region, 2800–3000 cm –1 ) were deconvoluted to independently quantify each VOC in binary mixtures. In these experiments, competitive uptake between the two VOCs was strongly asymmetric. On p-Si, heptane displaced already adsorbed ethanol molecules at around 40% heptane concentration in the mixture, whereas, to replace already adsorbed heptane from the p-Si pores, approximately 65% ethanol concentration was needed. However, on p-SiO 2, the ethanol molecules resisted displacement until almost 70% heptane vapor concentration was reached, due to the hydrogen bonding between the polar ethanol and silanol bonds present in the p-SiO 2 membrane. These results demonstrate that dynamic selectivity in multicomponent adsorption depends on both surface chemistry and adsorption kinetics and cannot be inferred from equilibrium desorption studies alone. This in-situ spectroscopic study enables us to understand competitive adsorption–desorption kinetics without having to reach adsorption equilibrium. Such an approach can facilitate the design of porous material-based sensing and separation strategies to achieve rapid VOC uptake and recovery.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis · Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Materials Science and Engineering Program and Texas Materials Institute

The University of Texas at Austin

Walker Department of Mechanical Engineering

McKetta Department of Chemical Engineering

Funding

National Science Foundation

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/D1EN00929J10.1039/D1EN00929J ↗
2. 10.1016/j.clay.2019.02.02210.1016/j.clay.2019.02.022 ↗
3. 10.1080/10937404.2013.85360910.1080/10937404.2013.853609 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jiec.2018.09.01210.1016/j.jiec.2018.09.012 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.04910.1016/j.cej.2019.01.049 ↗
6. 10.1080/10962247.2016.120925710.1080/10962247.2016.1209257 ↗
7. 10.1039/C5CS00040H10.1039/C5CS00040H ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c0058210.1021/acs.accounts.0c00582 ↗
9. 10.1021/acssensors.2c0030110.1021/acssensors.2c00301 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.12353010.1016/j.seppur.2023.123530 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.12.04410.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.12.044 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.04.05510.1016/j.jcis.2014.04.055 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cej.2008.11.00310.1016/j.cej.2008.11.003 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.06.06210.1016/j.seppur.2018.06.062 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cej.2025.16058010.1016/j.cej.2025.160580 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0209710.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02097 ↗
17. 10.1039/D3CP03779G10.1039/D3CP03779G ↗
18. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.10.02010.1016/j.micromeso.2007.10.020 ↗
19. 10.1063/5.013904210.1063/5.0139042 ↗
20. 10.1039/D0AN01822H10.1039/D0AN01822H ↗
21. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0161510.1021/acsomega.0c01615 ↗
22. Sailor M. J. · 201110.1002/9783527641901 ↗
23. 10.1177/0967033525136079310.1177/09670335251360793 ↗
24. Ethanol | CH3CH2OH | CID 702 - PubChem . https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Ethanol#section=Raman-Spectra (accessed Jan 04, 2026).
25. Heptane | C7H16 | CID 8900 - PubChem . https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/8900#section=Vapor-Pressure (accessed Jan 04, 2026).
26. 10.1007/s10450-014-9606-z10.1007/s10450-014-9606-z ↗
27. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.04.04310.1016/j.micromeso.2012.04.043 ↗
28. 10.1515/pac-2014-111710.1515/pac-2014-1117 ↗
29. 10.1021/jp963322r10.1021/jp963322r ↗
30. 10.1155/2013/47329410.1155/2013/473294 ↗
31. 10.1021/jp067578110.1021/jp0675781 ↗
32. Smith B. · 201810.1201/9780203750841 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.44330210.1063/1.443302 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.05.01710.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.05.017 ↗
35. 10.1021/ja027141g10.1021/ja027141g ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12215610.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122156 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cis.2009.07.00910.1016/j.cis.2009.07.009 ↗
38. 10.1080/0959333170861636210.1080/09593331708616362 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.molliq.2023.12141610.1016/j.molliq.2023.121416 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsomega.3c0173510.1021/acsomega.3c01735 ↗
41. 10.15376/biores.14.3.7582-762610.15376/biores.14.3.7582-7626 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.cherd.2016.02.00610.1016/j.cherd.2016.02.006 ↗
43. 10.1021/acsomega.1c0466110.1021/acsomega.1c04661 ↗
44. Kanagalakshmi M. · 2024 · 13510.1007/978-3-031-48719-4_8 ↗
45. 10.1038/srep2396610.1038/srep23966 ↗
46. Smith B. C. · 201110.1201/b10777 ↗