Research on Donor-Mixing-Acceptor Sandwich-Structured Organic Photodetectors Based on the “Sponge Permeation” Model
Source abstract
Abstract
Organic photodetectors (OPDs) have garnered significant attention due to their cost-effectiveness, high optical absorption coefficients, solution processability, energy-efficient production methods, exceptional mechanical flexibility, and customizable spectral responses. However, noise suppression has consistently presented a great challenge for the development of the use of OPDs. This study introduces the “sponge permeation” model, which facilitates the fabrication of distinct donor-mix-acceptor (D-m-A) sandwich-structured OPDs through sequential deposition techniques. The resulting D-m-A structure significantly suppresses the noise current and shortens the charge transfer paths, leading to pseudoplanar heterojunction (PPHJ) OPDs that exhibit higher detectivity (6.81 × 10 12 Jones) and faster response speeds (0.59/0.73 μs) compared to conventional bulk heterojunction (BHJ) OPDs. Furthermore, the PPHJ devices exhibited greater stability than the BHJ devices, maintaining 90% of their original performance after 30 days of storage in nitrogen. Notably, the acceptor material can be easily separated from the PPHJ film, enabling a straightforward recycling process that can reduce the costs associated with the manufacture of organic electronic devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Department of Polymer Science & Materials, School of Chemical Engineering
Dalian University of Technology
Funding
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/nano1221377510.3390/nano12213775 ↗
2. 10.1002/advs.20200241810.1002/advs.202002418 ↗
3. 10.1002/aelm.20230034010.1002/aelm.202300340 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20190204510.1002/adma.201902045 ↗
5. 10.1002/advs.20230417410.1002/advs.202304174 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20230102010.1002/adma.202301020 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20220959810.1002/adma.202209598 ↗
8. 10.1039/D3TA06835H10.1039/D3TA06835H ↗
9. 10.1002/adom.20210183710.1002/adom.202101837 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.06.06410.1016/j.cclet.2022.06.064 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.10867310.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108673 ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20210632610.1002/adfm.202106326 ↗
13. 10.1002/adom.20220260610.1002/adom.202202606 ↗
14. 10.1002/adom.20230217010.1002/adom.202302170 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20221495610.1002/adfm.202214956 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.12584910.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.125849 ↗
17. 10.1039/D3TA04269C10.1039/D3TA04269C ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20200723110.1002/adma.202007231 ↗
19. 10.1002/adfm.20190247810.1002/adfm.201902478 ↗
20. 10.1039/D0EE03490H10.1039/D0EE03490H ↗
21. 10.1039/C8TA06860G10.1039/C8TA06860G ↗
22. 10.1039/D2EE02392J10.1039/D2EE02392J ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0227610.1021/acs.chemmater.8b02276 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c0253510.1021/acs.jpcc.3c02535 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41467-023-41978-010.1038/s41467-023-41978-0 ↗
26. 10.1002/aenm.20200357610.1002/aenm.202003576 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.11.02310.1016/j.joule.2018.11.023 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c0165110.1021/acs.jpcc.3c01651 ↗
29. 10.1002/adom.20200138810.1002/adom.202001388 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsami.2c0833610.1021/acsami.2c08336 ↗
31. 10.1002/adfm.20210600910.1002/adfm.202106009 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.14965310.1016/j.cej.2024.149653 ↗
33. 10.1002/aenm.20240113010.1002/aenm.202401130 ↗
34. 10.1002/adfm.20230609510.1002/adfm.202306095 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.joule.2024.06.00610.1016/j.joule.2024.06.006 ↗