Correlating Ligand Properties with Photocatalytic Efficiency: A Computational Framework for Interface Engineering
Source abstract
Abstract
We present the application of the Marcus-Hush formalism as a theoretical framework to investigate charge transfer dynamics in ligand-protected Au systems. By integrating key parameters such as energy level differences and electronic coupling, this approach enables the prediction of photocatalytic efficiency in electron-driven water splitting. Simulations of diverse ligand-functionalized AuNPs establish a clear correlation between charge transfer rates and hydrogen evolution, specifically for functionalized AuNPs bearing aromatic thiols with various para-substituents. Additionally, we extend this framework to selenol-substituted systems, revealing that while selenols perform comparably to thiols in some cases, they do not consistently enhance photocatalytic activity. Beyond electron-driven hydrogen production, we further explore the role of ligand chemistry in modulating hole transfer processes relevant to oxidative half-reactions. In this context, the OH-thiol ligand-functionalized AuNP emerges as the most effective photocatalyst for hole-driven reactions. Overall, this study provides a systematic methodology for screening and designing ligand-functionalized AuNP photocatalysts, offering mechanistic insights into how ligand properties govern photocatalytic performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry
Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar
Funding
Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C9NA00431A10.1039/C9NA00431A ↗
2. 10.1039/D1NA00500F10.1039/D1NA00500F ↗
3. 10.1039/C9TA01840A10.1039/C9TA01840A ↗
4. 10.1039/c6ra28640b10.1039/c6ra28640b ↗
5. 10.1021/nl503585m10.1021/nl503585m ↗
6. 10.1038/nnano.2017.13110.1038/nnano.2017.131 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0877310.1021/acsnano.0c08773 ↗
8. 10.1039/D3NR02829A10.1039/D3NR02829A ↗
9. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.10.01910.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.10.019 ↗
10. 10.1021/acscatal.1c0090310.1021/acscatal.1c00903 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c0194110.1021/acs.chemmater.2c01941 ↗
12. 10.1021/la020628i10.1021/la020628i ↗
13. 10.1039/c3cp51304a10.1039/c3cp51304a ↗
14. 10.1021/jacs.4c0252410.1021/jacs.4c02524 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.513821610.1063/1.5138216 ↗
16. 10.1021/jp511615r10.1021/jp511615r ↗
17. 10.1039/d1dt00082a10.1039/d1dt00082a ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20040121610.1002/adma.200401216 ↗
19. 10.1002/smll.20200438110.1002/smll.202004381 ↗
20. 10.1021/ja017706t10.1021/ja017706t ↗
21. 10.1021/la015701410.1021/la0157014 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.3c1026010.1021/acsami.3c10260 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.05460610.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.054606 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.169679210.1063/1.1696792 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.174430510.1063/1.1744305 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B86410.1103/PhysRev.136.B864 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0656610.1021/acs.jpcc.7b06566 ↗
29. 10.1002/wcms.115910.1002/wcms.1159 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.cpc.2004.12.01410.1016/j.cpc.2004.12.014 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.364110.1103/PhysRevB.58.3641 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.170310.1103/PhysRevB.54.1703 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.46714610.1063/1.467146 ↗
34. 10.1039/b508541a10.1039/b508541a ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
36. 10.1021/jp034225i10.1021/jp034225i ↗
37. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Caricato, M.; Li, X.; Hratchian, H. P.; Izmaylov, A. F.; Bloino, J.; Zheng, G.; Sonnenberg, J. L.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Vreven, T.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Peralta, J. E.; Ogliaro, F.; Bearpark, M.; Heyd, J. J.; Brothers, E.; Kudin, K. N.; Staroverov, V. N.; Kobayashi, R.; Normand, J.; Raghavachari, K.; Rendell, A.; Burant, J. C.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Cossi, M.; Rega, N.; Millam, J. M.; Klene, M.; Knox, J. E.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Martin, R. L.; Morokuma, K.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Farkas; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cioslowski, J.; Fox, D. J. Gaussian 09. Revision E.01; Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford CT, 2009.
38. 10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x ↗
39. 10.1177/174751981986162610.1177/1747519819861626 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.16.174810.1103/PhysRevB.16.1748 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
44. 10.1070/RC1972v041n04ABEH00207510.1070/RC1972v041n04ABEH002075 ↗