journal article·2025-05-21

Turning Waste into Treasure: Radiation Byproduct-Induced Fe(III)/Fe(II) Conversion for Efficient Ferroptosis to Improve Iodine-131-Based Transarterial Radioembolization for Liver Tumors

Jiangnan Xu, Xiu Luo, Weiwei Su, Guorong Jia, Huawei Cai, Danni Li, Rou Li, Xiangdong Wang, Yefa Yang, Tao Wang, Changjing Zuo

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 17· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is a primary palliative treatment for advanced liver cancer. Nonetheless, its therapeutic efficacy is frequently hindered by resistance to tumor cell apoptosis induced by inter-radiotherapy. Induction of multiple cell death modalities provides a potential solution to this challenge. Ferroptosis, a distinct form of cell death from apoptosis, is dependent on the intracellular Fe 2+ -mediated Fenton reaction for the production of hydroxyl radicals (·OH) and is gaining recognition as a promising approach for cancer treatment. In this study, we synthesized a therapeutic radionuclide iodine-131 ( 131 I)-based TARE agent by combining 131 I-labeled iron-based MIL-88B(Fe) nanoparticles (NPs) (abbreviated as 131 I-MIL-88B(Fe)) with Lipiodol to achieve a combined apoptosis–ferroptosis tumor therapy. Specifically, a mixture of Lipiodol and 131 I-MIL-88B(Fe) NPs was injected into the liver tumors through the hepatic artery. Lipiodol blocks the arterial blood supply of the tumor, causing tumor tissue necrosis, whereas 131 I inter-radiotherapy damages deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) through direct action or indirectly via the production of ·OH through H 2 O radiolysis, leading to tumor cell apoptosis. Importantly, hydrated electrons (e aq – ), a byproduct of H 2 O radiolysis, promoted the conversion of Fe 3+ to Fe 2+ in MIL-88B(Fe) NPs, enhancing the efficacy of the Fenton reaction and triggering ferroptosis. In vitro experiments demonstrated that compared to 131 I alone, 131 I-MIL-88B(Fe) NPs significantly enhanced ferroptosis-mediated tumor cell death due to 131 I-induced Fe 2+ production, which increased catalytic activity in the Fenton reaction. In a rat model bearing orthotopic N1S1 liver tumors, TARE with Lipiodol and 131 I-MIL-88B(Fe) NPs induced tumor cell necrosis, apoptosis, and ferroptosis, resulting in improved therapeutic outcomes. This study leverages e aq – to facilitate Fe 3+ /Fe 2+ conversion for efficient ferroptosis, turning waste into a valuable resource. This demonstrated the innovative integration of multiple treatment strategies to augment the efficacy of TARE in liver cancer therapy.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis · Renal cell carcinoma treatment · Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Medical Imaging

Xuzhou Medical University

Department of Nuclear Medicine

the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University

Department of Radiology

Naval Medical Centre

Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital

Sichuan University

Mini-Invasive Intervention Center

the Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University

Funding

Major Research Plan · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.08.02110.1016/j.jhep.2022.08.021 ↗
2. 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2015.03.0310.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2015.03.03 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.02.01010.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.02.010 ↗
4. 10.3350/cmh.2017.000410.3350/cmh.2017.0004 ↗
5. 10.1002/hep.3181910.1002/hep.31819 ↗
6. 10.1038/nrc395810.1038/nrc3958 ↗
7. 10.1186/s12943-023-01801-210.1186/s12943-023-01801-2 ↗
8. 10.1084/jem.2020160610.1084/jem.20201606 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.11.01410.1016/j.canlet.2014.11.014 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41571-020-00462-010.1038/s41571-020-00462-0 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.03.02510.1016/j.cclet.2019.03.025 ↗
12. 10.1038/nchembio.141610.1038/nchembio.1416 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0046110.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00461 ↗
14. 10.7150/thno.5334610.7150/thno.53346 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.04.02110.1016/j.jcis.2022.04.021 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13530910.1016/j.cej.2022.135309 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.01.01610.1016/j.apsb.2021.01.016 ↗
18. 10.1002/anie.20151003110.1002/anie.201510031 ↗
19. 10.1002/adfm.20240079110.1002/adfm.202400791 ↗
20. Jin Z. J. · Acta Pharmacol. Sin. · 2004 · 25 · 146
21. 10.1007/s41061-016-0050-210.1007/s41061-016-0050-2 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.05.08210.1016/j.jcis.2020.05.082 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.04210.1016/j.cell.2012.03.042 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.02110.1016/j.cell.2017.09.021 ↗
25. 10.1007/s13238-021-00841-y10.1007/s13238-021-00841-y ↗
26. 10.1038/oncsis.2015.4910.1038/oncsis.2015.49 ↗
27. 10.1038/cdd.2015.15810.1038/cdd.2015.158 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41392-020-00216-510.1038/s41392-020-00216-5 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.10.01110.1016/j.cmet.2020.10.011 ↗
30. 10.1038/nrg248410.1038/nrg2484 ↗
31. 10.1093/nar/gkw109210.1093/nar/gkw1092 ↗
32. 10.1038/nature1434410.1038/nature14344 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.redox.2022.10236510.1016/j.redox.2022.102365 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.11.03010.1016/j.biopha.2018.11.030 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.05.01610.1016/j.cmet.2021.05.016 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.cca.2019.01.01110.1016/j.cca.2019.01.011 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.04810.1016/j.cell.2017.11.048 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.10.01410.1016/j.tcb.2015.10.014 ↗
39. 10.1073/pnas.160324411310.1073/pnas.1603244113 ↗