journal article·2024-08-07Open access

Comparison of the Impact of NaIO4-Accelerated, Cu2+/H2O2-Accelerated, and Novel Ion-Accelerated Methods of Poly(l-DOPA) Coating on Collagen-Sealed Vascular Prostheses: Strengths and Weaknesses

Michał Fornal, Agnieszka Krawczyńska, Anna Belcarz

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 31

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Sensitive biomaterials subjected to surface modification require delicate methods to preserve their structures and key properties. These include collagen-sealed polyester vascular prostheses. For their functionalization, coating with polycatecholamines (PCAs) can be used. PCAs change some important biological properties of biomaterials, e.g., hydrophilicity, bioactivity, antibacterial activity, and drug binding. The coating process can be stimulated by oxidants, organic solvents, or process conditions. However, these factors may change the properties of the PCA layer and the matrix itself. In this work, collagen-sealed vascular grafts were functionalized with a poly( l -DOPA) (PLD) layer using novel seawater-inspired ion combination as an accelerator, compared to the sodium periodate, Cu 2+ /H 2 O 2 mixture, and accelerator-free reference methods. Then, poly( l -DOPA) was used as the interface for antibiotic binding. The coated prostheses were characterized (SEM, FIB-SEM, FTIR, UV/vis), and their important functional parameters (mechanical, antioxidant, hemolytic, and prothrombotic properties, bioactivity, stability in human blood and simulated body fluid (SBF), antibiotic binding, release, and antibacterial activity) were compared. It was found that although sodium periodate increased the strength and drug-binding capacity of the prosthesis, it also increased the blood hemolysis risk. Cu 2+ /H 2 O 2 destabilized the mechanical properties of the coating and the graft. The seawater-inspired ion-accelerated method was efficient, stable, and matrix- and human blood-friendly, and it stimulated hydroxyapatite formation on the prosthesis surface. The results lead to the conclusion that selection of the PCA formation accelerator should be based on a careful analysis of the biological properties of medical devices. They also suggest that the ion-accelerated method of PLD coating on medical devices may be highly effective and safer than the oxidant-accelerated coating method.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Chair and Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Medical University of Lublin, Chodźki 1, 20-093 Lublin, Poland

Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 141 Wołoska, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki

References (73)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ar100079y10.1021/ar100079y ↗
2. 10.1126/science.114724110.1126/science.1147241 ↗
3. 10.1021/ma101526k10.1021/ma101526k ↗
4. 10.1021/nl400269d10.1021/nl400269d ↗
5. 10.1021/am402585y10.1021/am402585y ↗
6. 10.1039/B916619J10.1039/B916619J ↗
7. 10.1021/acsomega.8b0253710.1021/acsomega.8b02537 ↗
8. 10.1021/bm100779410.1021/bm1007794 ↗
9. 10.1021/es400571g10.1021/es400571g ↗
10. 10.1039/C5TB02510A10.1039/C5TB02510A ↗
11. 10.1039/c1nr10969c10.1039/c1nr10969c ↗
12. 10.3390/ijms2409800210.3390/ijms24098002 ↗
13. 10.1021/cr400407a10.1021/cr400407a ↗
14. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.06.02410.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.06.024 ↗
15. 10.1021/bi000243410.1021/bi0002434 ↗
16. 10.1038/nm131410.1038/nm1314 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b0058310.1021/acs.accounts.8b00583 ↗
18. 10.1177/1358863X1561257410.1177/1358863X15612574 ↗
19. 10.1016/S1078-5884(03)00344-710.1016/S1078-5884(03)00344-7 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.12.03010.1016/j.ejvs.2004.12.030 ↗
21. 10.1002/jbm.a.3407710.1002/jbm.a.34077 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.09.00210.1016/j.actbio.2010.09.002 ↗
23. 10.1093/rb/rbz04310.1093/rb/rbz043 ↗
24. 10.1186/s40824-023-00423-510.1186/s40824-023-00423-5 ↗
25. 10.1021/am302763510.1021/am3027635 ↗
26. 10.1021/bm300194b10.1021/bm300194b ↗
27. 10.1016/j.msec.2021.11254410.1016/j.msec.2021.112544 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0158710.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01587 ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.20151072410.1002/anie.201510724 ↗
30. 10.1038/srep0607010.1038/srep06070 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jiec.2016.11.00710.1016/j.jiec.2016.11.007 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0275710.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02757 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.7b0610510.1021/acsami.7b06105 ↗
34. 10.1002/smll.20160044310.1002/smll.201600443 ↗
35. 10.1021/jp100922t10.1021/jp100922t ↗
36. 10.1016/j.bprint.2022.e0020110.1016/j.bprint.2022.e00201 ↗
37. 10.1016/0267-6605(93)90013-W10.1016/0267-6605(93)90013-W ↗
38. 10.3390/membranes1210092910.3390/membranes12100929 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.msec.2022.11264510.1016/j.msec.2022.112645 ↗
40. 10.3390/ijms2316936910.3390/ijms23169369 ↗
41. 10.1016/S0011-9164(01)00420-910.1016/S0011-9164(01)00420-9 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jscs.2013.03.01010.1016/j.jscs.2013.03.010 ↗
43. 10.1080/19443994.2014.93949110.1080/19443994.2014.939491 ↗
44. 10.1615/AnnualRevHeatTransfer.201200465910.1615/AnnualRevHeatTransfer.2012004659 ↗
45. Lu G. Y. · 2019
46. Murray J. · 2001
47. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11848510.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118485 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11752410.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117524 ↗
49. AATCC Test Method 100-2004. Antibacterial Finishes on Textile Materials: Assessment of AATCC Technical Manual American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists: Research Triangle Park, NC.; 2005.
50. B.C. Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy. Copper Water Quality Guideline for the Protection of Marine Aquatic Life (Reformatted from: British Columbia Ministry of Environments and Parks, 1987. Water Quality Criteria for Copper). Water Quality Guideline Series, 2019.
51. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c0074410.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00744 ↗
52. 10.1039/C8RA02930J10.1039/C8RA02930J ↗
53. 10.1039/C6RA12306F10.1039/C6RA12306F ↗
54. 10.1016/j.bpc.2022.10691710.1016/j.bpc.2022.106917 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.02.00210.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.02.002 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.saa.2019.11800610.1016/j.saa.2019.118006 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.bbrep.2017.02.00610.1016/j.bbrep.2017.02.006 ↗
58. 10.1002/pen.1069410.1002/pen.10694 ↗
59. 10.1021/la104981s10.1021/la104981s ↗
60. 10.1039/D2RA07622E10.1039/D2RA07622E ↗
61. Getnet M. · Int. J. Sci. Basic Appl. Res. · 2015 · 22 · 232
62. 10.1016/j.jece.2022.10905710.1016/j.jece.2022.109057 ↗
63. 10.1042/bj254051910.1042/bj2540519 ↗
64. 10.1039/D0BM01070G10.1039/D0BM01070G ↗
65. 10.3164/jcbn.11-007FR10.3164/jcbn.11-007FR ↗
66. 10.4236/ns.2015.71205510.4236/ns.2015.712055 ↗
67. Standard Practice for Assessment of Hemolytic Properties of Materials ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA; 2008.
68. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.10.07410.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.10.074 ↗
69. 10.1002/adfm.20090234710.1002/adfm.200902347 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.06.00410.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.06.004 ↗
71. 10.1039/c2jm34825j10.1039/c2jm34825j ↗
72. 10.1038/srep2442010.1038/srep24420 ↗
73. 10.3390/biomimetics203001210.3390/biomimetics2030012 ↗