journal article·2025-09-10

Enhanced Interfacial Bonding of Graft Copolymers

Yawei Gao, Ajay Jayswal, Arit Das, Jan Michael Y. Carrillo, Joshua T. Damron, Christopher C. Bowland, Zeyang Yu, Michael Toomey, Polyxeni P. Angelopoulou, Shankar Kharal, Gamini Mendis, Holly Humphrey, Bobby G. Sumpter, Logan T. Kearney, Amit K. Naskar

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 17· Issue 36
Publisher page

Abstract

To understand how thermoplastic welding strength can be tuned through chemical modifications and macromolecular topology, we combined coarse-grained molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with experimental validation. Our simulations examined the diffusion dynamics of both linear and graft polymers across representative interfaces, revealing that diffusion-controlled interdigitation follows a power law, with the exponent decreasing from 0.34 to 0.11 as grafting density increases from 7.5 to 196% (with side chains grafted to both sides of a monomer unit). The addition of side chains enhances welding efficiency, as dense bottlebrush polymers with high grafting density reach maximum rupture strength faster than linear polymers. However, their saturated rupture strength is lower. This observation is subsequently corroborated by experimental lap-shear tests comparing linear polyethylene with octene grafted polyethylene elastomers. Our MD simulations show that unlike linear polymers, where backbone entanglements dominate, the grafted side chains introduce mechanisms in addition to entanglement dilution. The rapid interdigitation of side chains creates a dense mesh of entropic van der Waals contacts, which can also enhance the film welding. Furthermore, our MD simulations reveal a brittle rupture behavior in linear and comb-like (mildly grafted) polymers, while bottlebrush (densely grafted) polymers display elastomeric behavior with a pronounced stress plateau prior to fracture. Our simulations deconvolute the influence of polymer topology on deformation behavior. The rate of polymer deformation becomes lower than the applied strain rate prior to rupture, and the onset of this deviation is progressively delayed from linear to bottlebrush polymers. This trend highlights the critical role of molecular architecture in governing the mechanical response. These results provide deeper insight into the underlying welding mechanisms of topological polymers and present a potential approach for mitigating the interface anisotropy that is inherent in advanced manufacturing techniques such as fused filament fabrication.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Chemical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1 Bethel Valley Rd, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, United States

Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1 Bethel Valley Rd, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, United States

Polymer Engineering and Science and Plastics Engineering Technology Departments, Penn State Behrend, 5101 Jordan Road, Erie, Pennsylvania 16563, United States

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.10063810.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100638 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10165810.1016/j.addma.2020.101658 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.10765410.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107654 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11340-018-00467-y10.1007/s11340-018-00467-y ↗
5. Patadiya N. H. · 2020 · 301
6. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.03610.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.036 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.10024810.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100248 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10833610.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108336 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10092210.1016/j.addma.2019.100922 ↗
10. 10.1039/C7SM00950J10.1039/C7SM00950J ↗
11. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.06.00610.1016/j.addma.2017.06.006 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.00210.1016/j.addma.2017.11.002 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.02910.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.029 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.03.06310.1016/j.polymer.2018.03.063 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsapm.0c0122810.1021/acsapm.0c01228 ↗
16. 10.1063/5.012866010.1063/5.0128660 ↗
17. 10.1002/pen.76028010910.1002/pen.760280109 ↗
18. 10.1002/pen.76029190610.1002/pen.760291906 ↗
19. 10.1007/BF0055207310.1007/BF00552073 ↗
20. 10.1021/ma971020x10.1021/ma971020x ↗
21. 10.1126/sciadv.aat496710.1126/sciadv.aat4967 ↗
22. 10.1002/adsu.20230007910.1002/adsu.202300079 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b0060010.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00600 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b0242810.1021/acs.macromol.9b02428 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.47297810.1063/1.472978 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.45854110.1063/1.458541 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b0183610.1021/acs.macromol.8b01836 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b0153510.1021/acs.macromol.8b01535 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c0314710.1021/acs.jpcb.2c03147 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b0429810.1021/acs.jpcb.9b04298 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c0143110.1021/acs.nanolett.4c01431 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.09830110.1103/PhysRevLett.110.098301 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c0150810.1021/acs.macromol.0c01508 ↗
34. 10.1021/ma302095k10.1021/ma302095k ↗
35. 10.1021/ma500755p10.1021/ma500755p ↗
36. 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10817110.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
37. Thompson, A. P.; A, H. M.; Berger, R.; Bolintineanu, D. S.; Brown, W. M.; Crozier, P. S.; in 't Veld, P. J.; Kohlmeyer, A.; Moore, S. G.; Nguyen, T. D.; Shan, R.; Stevens, M. J.; Tranchida, J.; Trott, C.; Plimpton, S. J. bond_style quartic command. https://docs.lammps.org/bond_quartic.html
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.14830410.1103/PhysRevLett.89.148304 ↗
39. 10.1021/ma000553u10.1021/ma000553u ↗
40. 10.1126/sciadv.160147810.1126/sciadv.1601478 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevE.99.05130110.1103/PhysRevE.99.051301 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.324530310.1063/1.3245303 ↗
43. 10.1021/ma60059a00610.1021/ma60059a006 ↗
45. 10.1021/acscentsci.0c0056710.1021/acscentsci.0c00567 ↗
46. Polyethylene https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/US/en/product/aldrich/427985
47. Information, T. ENGAGE 8402, Polyolefin Elastomer; 2025. https://www.dow.com/en-us/pdp.engage-8402-polyolefin-elastomer.102468z.html#tech-content.
48. 10.1103/PhysRevE.96.05250210.1103/PhysRevE.96.052502 ↗
49. 10.1126/science.109121510.1126/science.1091215 ↗
50. 10.1021/ma070943h10.1021/ma070943h ↗
51. 10.1002/macp.20190004310.1002/macp.201900043 ↗
52. 10.1021/jp056330t10.1021/jp056330t ↗
53. 10.1063/1.46950510.1063/1.469505 ↗
54. 10.1039/F2977730113310.1039/F29777301133 ↗
55. 10.1080/0026897950010137110.1080/00268979500101371 ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.30910.1103/PhysRevLett.80.309 ↗
57. 10.1063/1.220924010.1063/1.2209240 ↗
58. 10.1002/pi.1995.21038031410.1002/pi.1995.210380314 ↗
59. 10.1021/ma202759v10.1021/ma202759v ↗
60. 10.1209/0295-5075/92/2800310.1209/0295-5075/92/28003 ↗
61. 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b0068210.1021/acs.macromol.5b00682 ↗
62. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b0176110.1021/acs.macromol.8b01761 ↗