Peculiarities of Redox Catalysis With Peroxidase-Like Nanozymes
Source abstract
Abstract
Catalytic pathways of peroxidase-like nanozymes based on different nanomaterials are critically compared. For all nanomaterials, the catalytic rate constant ( k cat ) for reducing substrate is increased as the redox potential of the nanozyme itself is increased: 100 mV rise in the catalyst’s redox potential provides 1000 times higher k cat . Logarithm of the catalytic constant as a function of both nanozyme and substrate redox potentials for Prussian Blue belongs to the same trend as for the enzyme peroxidase, whereas other materials (Fe 3 O 4, CeO 2, and LiFePO 4 ) display significantly lower activity. Size-dependence of catalytic constant returns the slope from 2.6 to 2.8 in double logarithmic plots, indicating penetration of hydrogen peroxide to the bulk of nanozymes. The electrochemical rate constant, on the contrary, is much higher for smaller nanozymes, pointing to more dense packing of the electrocatalytic layer. Catalytically synthesized Prussian Blue nanozymes are successfully applied for ROS scavenging in living cells.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors · Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chemistry faculty of M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory, 1/3, Moscow 119991, Russia
Materials Science faculty of M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory, 1/73, Moscow 119991, Russia
Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Nanjing National Laboratory of Microstructures, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Artificial Functional Materials, Nanjing University, No 163 Xianlin Ave, Nanjing 210023Jiangsu, China
Funding
Russian Science Foundation
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/anie.20046064910.1002/anie.200460649 ↗
2. 10.1007/978-981-15-1490-610.1007/978-981-15-1490-6 ↗
3. 10.1038/nnano.2007.26010.1038/nnano.2007.260 ↗
4. 10.1039/C8CS00457A10.1039/C8CS00457A ↗
5. 10.59761/RCR508810.59761/RCR5088 ↗
6. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0504710.1021/acscatal.0c05047 ↗
7. 10.1021/acscatal.1c0121910.1021/acscatal.1c01219 ↗
8. 10.1039/tf935310154710.1039/tf9353101547 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41596-024-01034-710.1038/s41596-024-01034-7 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41596-018-0001-110.1038/s41596-018-0001-1 ↗
11. 10.1021/jacs.8b0522310.1021/jacs.8b05223 ↗
12. 10.1126/science.154.3756.1537.a10.1126/science.154.3756.1537.a ↗
13. 10.1002/anie.20180767610.1002/anie.201807676 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ejmcr.2024.10014110.1016/j.ejmcr.2024.100141 ↗
15. 10.1007/978-981-16-8984-0_2610.1007/978-981-16-8984-0_26 ↗
16. 10.1007/s12274-022-4666-y10.1007/s12274-022-4666-y ↗
17. 10.1039/D1NR06043K10.1039/D1NR06043K ↗
18. Yaropolov A. I. · Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR · 1979 · 249 · 1399
19. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.11404810.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114048 ↗
20. 10.1021/ac500595v10.1021/ac500595v ↗
21. Bard A. J. · 2022
22. 10.1021/jp064277i10.1021/jp064277i ↗
23. 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2017.04.00210.1016/j.bioelechem.2017.04.002 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c0154510.1021/acs.jpclett.4c01545 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0022-0728(98)00202-210.1016/S0022-0728(98)00202-2 ↗
26. 10.1002/elan.20050333510.1002/elan.200503335 ↗
27. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.31140110.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311401 ↗
28. 10.1155/2022/260692810.1155/2022/2606928 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2025.10254010.1016/j.mtchem.2025.102540 ↗