journal article·2024-06-19

Enhancing the Delamination Efficiency of Polyimide–Copper Bilayers with UV/Heat-Activated Foamable Adhesive: Insights and Applications

Wichean Khawdas, Yuko Sawada, Ken Miyata, Haruyuki Okamura, Kentaro Taki, Hiroshi Ito

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 24
Publisher page

Abstract

This study explores the adhesive properties of copolymers comprising glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) and 3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate (MPTMS), focusing on their suitability for adhesive applications. Peel resistance measurements revealed a substantial impact of the GMA/MPTMS ratio on adhesion capabilities, identifying an optimal ratio of 30/70 for copolymerization with tert -butyl acrylate ( t BA) to improve foaming performance. t BA, a foaming monomer activated by a photoacid generator and heat, enhances the copolymerized adhesive’s adhesion strength and foamability for postuse delamination. Chemical structure analysis through Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) confirmed successful polymerization, while rheological properties indicated decreased complex viscosity and adhesive strength with an increasing t BA content. The deprotection of the t -butyl group facilitated foam formation, supported by morphology analysis. These findings provide insights into foamable adhesive development with potential applications in delamination processes and implications for further exploration in polymer adhesion.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Photopolymerization techniques and applications · Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Research Center for GREEN Materials and Advanced Processing, Yamagata University, Yonezawa, Yamagata 992-8510, Japan

Department of Organic Materials Science, Graduate School of Organic Materials Science, Yamagata University, Yonezawa, Yamagata 992-8510, Japan

Department of Applied Chemistry Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka Metropolitan University, Sakai, Osaka 599-8531, Japan

Department of Frontier Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-1192, Japan

Funding

Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.16679110.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166791 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijheh.2023.11419210.1016/j.ijheh.2023.114192 ↗
3. Gramling, C. Earth’s Annual E-waste Could Grow to 75 Million Metric Tons by 2030. https://www.sciencenews.org/article/annual-e-waste-electronics-recycling-75-million-metric-tons (accessed 15 Feb, 2024).
4. 10.1016/j.scp.2023.10121010.1016/j.scp.2023.101210 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jaap.2013.01.02210.1016/j.jaap.2013.01.022 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11356-022-19974-610.1007/s11356-022-19974-6 ↗
7. 10.1007/s10653-022-01295-910.1007/s10653-022-01295-9 ↗
8. 10.1021/ma401595w10.1021/ma401595w ↗
9. 10.1021/am300103c10.1021/am300103c ↗
10. 10.2494/photopolymer.32.69310.2494/photopolymer.32.693 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10904-020-01468-y10.1007/s10904-020-01468-y ↗
12. Ricker, A. L. What Makes Epoxy Resins Good Adhesives? Why Do They Bond so Strongly to Surfaces? 2023. http://www.mereco.com/resources/ask-the-doctor/what-makes-epoxy-resins-good-adhesives-why-do-they-bond-so-strongly-to-surf (accessed Sep 11, 2023).
13. 10.1021/acs.macromol.1c0090410.1021/acs.macromol.1c00904 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.solener.2018.12.00410.1016/j.solener.2018.12.004 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13255510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132555 ↗
16. 10.1007/s42452-021-04753-810.1007/s42452-021-04753-8 ↗
17. 10.1002/app.5459610.1002/app.54596 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.prostr.2017.12.05410.1016/j.prostr.2017.12.054 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10854-019-02634-w10.1007/s10854-019-02634-w ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.03210.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.032 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.3c1101110.1021/acsami.3c11011 ↗
22. Lahokallio, S. Epoxy Adhesive May Not Be the Best Choice for Flexible Structures, 2019.
23. 10.1002/app.5459610.1002/app.54596 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.01.00110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.01.001 ↗
25. Ben-Amotz D. · Abstr. Pap. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2014 · 247
26. 10.1002/anie.20190746410.1002/anie.201907464 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.01.00810.1016/j.jdent.2006.01.008 ↗
28. 10.1039/C3TB21201G10.1039/C3TB21201G ↗
29. 10.1039/C5RA17666B10.1039/C5RA17666B ↗
30. 10.1002/pola.2108210.1002/pola.21082 ↗
31. 10.1007/s10904-012-9652-510.1007/s10904-012-9652-5 ↗
32. 10.4236/msa.2014.51411110.4236/msa.2014.514111 ↗
33. 10.1002/aoc.393210.1002/aoc.3932 ↗
34. 10.1002/pen.2610510.1002/pen.26105 ↗
35. 10.6028/jres.110.08110.6028/jres.110.081 ↗
36. 10.1039/c2lc41266g10.1039/c2lc41266g ↗
37. 10.56530/spectroscopy.mg2473z410.56530/spectroscopy.mg2473z4 ↗
38. 10.1002/pola.2804610.1002/pola.28046 ↗
39. San-Apro Ltd. Acid. Generation Mechanism of Ionic Photoacid Generators (Example of Sulfonium Salts). https://www.san-apro.co.jp/tech/PAG/ (accessed Feb 13, 2024).
40. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2024.15997010.1016/j.apsusc.2024.159970 ↗
41. 10.1002/app.4625210.1002/app.46252 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.bmc.2017.03.02010.1016/j.bmc.2017.03.020 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2011.01.00810.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2011.01.008 ↗
44. 10.1021/la404337d10.1021/la404337d ↗