journal article·2025-05-07

Saponin Gallate-Loaded Gd-Doped Zinc–Gallium Layered Double Hydroxides (Zn/Ga@Gd-LDH) Nanocarrier for Attenuating NF-κB-Mediated Inflammation

Momna Aslam, Batool Fatima, Rafia Batool, Muhammad Imran, Dilshad Hussain, Muhammad Najam-ul-Haq, Rubaida Mehmood

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 17· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

This work describes a drug delivery system (DDS) based on the therapeutic anti-inflammatory efficacy of saponin gallate (SG), a combination of gallic acid and saponin, chemically conjugated via an ester linkage. This formulation was loaded onto a biocompatible gadolinium-doped zinc–gallium-layered double hydroxide (Zn/Ga@Gd-LDH) nanocarrier. FT-IR, XRD, SEM, and HPLC were used to characterize the synthesized materials. UV–visible spectroscopy was employed to investigate the drug release from SG-Zn/Ga@Gd-LDH at an optimized temperature (45 °C) and pH (5). The kinetic release behavior of SG-Zn/Ga@Gd-LDH nanoparticles suggested that the first-order kinetic model was the most appropriate for the release profile. The regression value ( R 2 ) of 0.96614 indicated an optimal and controlled release for therapeutic effectiveness and minimal adverse effects over 54 h. The in vitro and in vivo models confirmed that drug-loaded nanocarriers exhibited antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer properties. Western blotting analysis suggested that SG-Zn/Ga@Gd-LDH abrogates the anti-inflammatory properties by halting the phosphorylation of pro-inflammatory proteins p-p65 and decreasing CRP levels involved in the NF-κB pathway. SG-Zn/Ga@Gd-LDH exhibited an anti-inflammatory effect by reducing the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines. SG-Zn/Ga@Gd-LDH treatment against an acute CCl4-induced liver injury model showed anti-inflammatory potential in histological parameters’ study. Radiolabeling of the drug saponin gallate with 99m Tc was carried out to determine its in vivo biodistribution. The chromatographic results indicated promising radiolabeling of up to 90% percentages. SPECT-CT imaging and ex vivo gamma counting in Wistar rats revealed different clearance rates of nanoparticles, aiding in the evaluation of the drug delivery nanosystem. The designed system also demonstrated antioxidant potential due to the SG compound having IC 50 127.45 μg/mL free radical scavenging activity. Ga@Gd-LDH showed a tumor-suppressing ability of 79.89 ± 3.91% for viable cells against breast cancer MCF-7 cells. The developed formulation could thus be a conducive strategy against inflammatory diseases.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics · Advanced Drug Delivery Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biochemistry

Bahauddin Zakariya University

Institute of Chemical Sciences

University of Peshawar

HEJ Research Institute of Chemistry, International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences

University of Karachi

MINAR Cancer Hospital Multan

Funding

Higher Education Commission, Pakistan

References (83)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.02910.1016/j.cell.2010.02.029 ↗
2. 10.3390/ijms2309459610.3390/ijms23094596 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.06.02510.1016/j.immuni.2019.06.025 ↗
4. 10.1002/ctm2.12610.1002/ctm2.126 ↗
5. 10.1007/s12016-008-8091-010.1007/s12016-008-8091-0 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.phymed.2020.15341110.1016/j.phymed.2020.153411 ↗
7. 10.3389/fphys.2021.68878010.3389/fphys.2021.688780 ↗
8. 10.3390/antiox1012199810.3390/antiox10121998 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2021.05.01210.1016/j.toxlet.2021.05.012 ↗
10. 10.1002/mco2.10410.1002/mco2.104 ↗
11. Hannoodee S. · 2020
12. 10.1172/JCI12461610.1172/JCI124616 ↗
13. 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2019.09.00410.1016/bs.apcsb.2019.09.004 ↗
14. 10.3389/fonc.2019.0139910.3389/fonc.2019.01399 ↗
15. 10.3389/fcell.2020.57470610.3389/fcell.2020.574706 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41392-021-00658-510.1038/s41392-021-00658-5 ↗
17. 10.3390/molecules2524593210.3390/molecules25245932 ↗
18. 10.3390/cancers1515390010.3390/cancers15153900 ↗
19. 10.1201/9781003418276-410.1201/9781003418276-4 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.11098510.1016/j.biopha.2020.110985 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.20210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.202 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41565-021-00866-810.1038/s41565-021-00866-8 ↗
23. 10.1080/09603123.2020.180541510.1080/09603123.2020.1805415 ↗
24. 10.1039/b902861g10.1039/b902861g ↗
25. 10.3390/polym303137710.3390/polym3031377 ↗
26. 10.3390/pharmaceutics1002005710.3390/pharmaceutics10020057 ↗
27. Shirin V. A. · J. Controlled Release · 2021 · 330 · 39810.1016/j.jconrel.2020.12.041 ↗
28. 10.1039/C9TB01312A10.1039/C9TB01312A ↗
29. 10.3390/nano709024410.3390/nano7090244 ↗
30. 10.2147/IJN.S22020210.2147/IJN.S220202 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jiec.2021.08.01210.1016/j.jiec.2021.08.012 ↗
32. Paarakh M. P. · Int. J. Pharm. Res. Tech. (IJPRT) · 2018 · 8 · 12
33. 10.1006/fstl.1997.024010.1006/fstl.1997.0240 ↗
34. 10.3390/molecules2605124410.3390/molecules26051244 ↗
35. 10.2174/157340991866622092914582410.2174/1573409918666220929145824 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jddst.2023.10470810.1016/j.jddst.2023.104708 ↗
37. 10.3892/mmr.2019.996710.3892/mmr.2019.9967 ↗
38. 10.3892/mmr.2020.1124010.3892/mmr.2020.11240 ↗
39. 10.1093/toxres/tfac05910.1093/toxres/tfac059 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.01.00110.1016/j.toxrep.2021.01.001 ↗
41. 10.1186/s12906-022-03554-910.1186/s12906-022-03554-9 ↗
42. 10.1186/s12906-021-03479-910.1186/s12906-021-03479-9 ↗
43. 10.1177/0960327121105443610.1177/09603271211054436 ↗
44. 10.3390/nano1112326010.3390/nano11123260 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.09.08910.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.09.089 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.11.03510.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.11.035 ↗
47. 10.1038/s41598-020-71175-810.1038/s41598-020-71175-8 ↗
48. 10.26717/BJSTR.2020.27.00446310.26717/BJSTR.2020.27.004463 ↗
49. Rajvanshi S. K. · Int. J. Minor Fruits, Med. Aromatic Plants · 2017 · 3 · 1
50. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.11102610.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111026 ↗
51. 10.3390/ijms16102467310.3390/ijms161024673 ↗
52. 10.4236/jbm.2019.7700610.4236/jbm.2019.77006 ↗
53. 10.1007/s12517-021-09275-610.1007/s12517-021-09275-6 ↗
54. 10.1080/14786419.2014.99234510.1080/14786419.2014.992345 ↗
55. 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-011810.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0118 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.12223210.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122232 ↗
57. 10.2147/IJN.S9561110.2147/IJN.S95611 ↗
58. 10.1039/C6TB03032G10.1039/C6TB03032G ↗
59. Singhvi G. · Int. J. Pharm. Stud. Res. · 2011 · 2 · 77
60. 10.33263/BRIAC116.146401466010.33263/BRIAC116.1464014660 ↗
61. 10.34874/PRSM.mjph-vol3iss2.3029010.34874/PRSM.mjph-vol3iss2.30290 ↗
62. 10.1016/S0031-9422(02)00393-X10.1016/S0031-9422(02)00393-X ↗
63. 10.22038/ijbms.2019.32806.789710.22038/ijbms.2019.32806.7897 ↗
64. 10.1371/journal.pone.022795010.1371/journal.pone.0227950 ↗
65. 10.1038/onc.2016.21710.1038/onc.2016.217 ↗
66. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-014910.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0149 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2011.12.00510.1016/j.semcancer.2011.12.005 ↗
68. 10.1038/s41392-020-00312-610.1038/s41392-020-00312-6 ↗
69. 10.1101/gad.183434.11110.1101/gad.183434.111 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.11052510.1016/j.biopha.2020.110525 ↗
71. 10.1155/2017/495193710.1155/2017/4951937 ↗
72. 10.1093/jpp/rgab11710.1093/jpp/rgab117 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.phyplu.2020.10001710.1016/j.phyplu.2020.100017 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.jddst.2020.10180910.1016/j.jddst.2020.101809 ↗
75. 10.1002/VIW.2023011710.1002/VIW.20230117 ↗
76. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0996810.1021/acsnano.3c09968 ↗
77. 10.1002/adfm.20221251010.1002/adfm.202212510 ↗
78. 10.3390/nano1007140310.3390/nano10071403 ↗
79. 10.4103/1735-5362.23515610.4103/1735-5362.235156 ↗
80. 10.31069/japsr.v3i3.210.31069/japsr.v3i3.2 ↗
81. 10.1007/s00289-021-03761-310.1007/s00289-021-03761-3 ↗
82. 10.3390/pr904062110.3390/pr9040621 ↗
83. 10.1021/acsomega.4c0599110.1021/acsomega.4c05991 ↗