Selective Xenon Recovery Using Aluminum-Based Metal–Organic Frameworks with Conserved Pore Topology
Source abstract
Abstract
Xenon (Xe) is a commercially valuable element found in trace amounts in the off-gas from used nuclear fuel. Recovering Xe from these streams provides a cost-effective means to increase its supply. However, achieving high-purity Xe recovery is challenging due to the need for separation from nearly identical krypton (Kr). Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), a class of crystalline porous materials, show potential to separate Xe and Kr by utilizing differences in their kinetic diameters, allowing for selective separation. In this work, we study the impact of pore aperture and volume on selective Xe recovery using four robust aluminum MOFs: Al-PMOF, Al-PyrMOF, Al-BMOF and MIL-120, all with conserved structural topology. The pore topology in each MOF is dictated by the dimensions of the tetracarboxylate ligand employed, with larger ligands leading to MOFs with increased pore size and volume. Our experimental and computational investigations revealed that MIL-120 exhibits the highest affinity (21.94 k H(Xe) = 21.94 mmol g –1 bar –1 ) for Xe among all MOFs, while Al-BMOF demonstrates the highest Xe/Kr selectivity of 14.34. We evaluated the potential of both MIL-120 and Al-BMOF for Xe recovery through breakthrough analysis using a mixture of 400 ppm Xe:40 ppm Kr. Our results indicate that due to its larger pore volume, Al-BMOF captured more Xe than MIL-120, demonstrating superior Xe/Kr separation efficiency.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, United States
Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, United States
Funding
Oregon State University
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.04610.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.046 ↗
2. 10.1111/ajes.1233610.1111/ajes.12336 ↗
3. 10.1080/10934529.2011.60704210.1080/10934529.2011.607042 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.futures.2015.03.00310.1016/j.futures.2015.03.003 ↗
5. 10.1007/s41748-021-00217-610.1007/s41748-021-00217-6 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11356-021-12966-y10.1007/s11356-021-12966-y ↗
7. 10.1371/journal.pone.012407410.1371/journal.pone.0124074 ↗
8. 10.1080/01496395.2020.179568010.1080/01496395.2020.1795680 ↗
9. Jubin, R. T. Recent Advances in Used Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Off-Gas Treatment. In 35th International Nuclear Air Cleaning Conference, June 3-5, 2018, Charleston, SC, 2018.
10. 10.1038/s41467-020-16647-110.1038/s41467-020-16647-1 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.07.07310.1016/j.cej.2016.07.073 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2017.10.01410.1016/j.astropartphys.2017.10.014 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2007.06.00210.1016/j.astropartphys.2007.06.002 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10812-019-00879-110.1007/s10812-019-00879-1 ↗
15. 10.1016/0140-6736(90)91444-F10.1016/0140-6736(90)91444-F ↗
16. 10.1115/1.276970110.1115/1.2769701 ↗
17. David, L. C.; Varghese, J. T.; Syamala, S. R. N. A. Ion Propulsion Technology: NASA’s Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) Development and Long Duration Tests Results and its Applications. In 2020 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET), 4 Feb, 9 April, 2020; pp. 1–5.10.1109/ASET48392.2020.9118370 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.493497810.1063/1.4934978 ↗
19. Thomas T. · Phys. Methods Chem. Anal. · 2013 · 4 · 45
20. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.09.00210.1016/j.earscirev.2013.09.002 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.486153710.1063/1.4861537 ↗
22. 10.1063/5.006515410.1063/5.0065154 ↗
23. 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4757-110.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4757-1 ↗
24. 10.1021/ar500312610.1021/ar5003126 ↗
25. 10.1039/c3cc44374d10.1039/c3cc44374d ↗
26. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.11039010.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110390 ↗
27. 10.1126/science.123044410.1126/science.1230444 ↗
28. 10.1039/B819707P10.1039/B819707P ↗
29. 10.1039/b804680h10.1039/b804680h ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c0284110.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c02841 ↗
31. 10.1002/aic.1239710.1002/aic.12397 ↗
32. 10.1186/s42480-019-0003-y10.1186/s42480-019-0003-y ↗
33. 10.1016/j.chempr.2017.12.02510.1016/j.chempr.2017.12.025 ↗
34. 10.1038/ncomms1183110.1038/ncomms11831 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0504810.1021/acs.chemmater.9b05048 ↗
36. 10.1021/jacs.9b0342210.1021/jacs.9b03422 ↗
37. 10.1021/jacs.1c1287310.1021/jacs.1c12873 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.mtsust.2021.10010410.1016/j.mtsust.2021.100104 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ccr.2021.21402010.1016/j.ccr.2021.214020 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.13760710.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137607 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.crci.2015.08.00610.1016/j.crci.2015.08.006 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ccr.2023.21517510.1016/j.ccr.2023.215175 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.12333510.1016/j.seppur.2023.123335 ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.cgd.0c0128310.1021/acs.cgd.0c01283 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.jced.0c0032310.1021/acs.jced.0c00323 ↗
46. 10.1021/cm902310610.1021/cm9023106 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.04.02310.1016/j.micromeso.2015.04.023 ↗
48. 10.1021/ja906041f10.1021/ja906041f ↗
49. 10.1002/anie.20120247110.1002/anie.201202471 ↗
50. 10.1038/s41586-019-1798-710.1038/s41586-019-1798-7 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.10147010.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101470 ↗
52. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0384810.1021/acs.jpcc.7b03848 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c0121910.1021/acs.jcim.1c01219 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.cpc.2015.11.01610.1016/j.cpc.2015.11.016 ↗
55. 10.1016/S0927-7757(01)00612-410.1016/S0927-7757(01)00612-4 ↗
56. 10.1039/D0CS00424C10.1039/D0CS00424C ↗
57. 10.1039/D2TA06863J10.1039/D2TA06863J ↗
58. 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.12.02110.1016/j.memsci.2018.12.021 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.01.02710.1016/j.jcis.2010.01.027 ↗
60. 10.1155/2017/303981710.1155/2017/3039817 ↗
61. Thallapally P. K. · 201210.2172/1122332 ↗
62. 10.1021/acsami.1c0225710.1021/acsami.1c02257 ↗
63. 10.3390/membranes1111083310.3390/membranes11110833 ↗