Design Parameters for Subwavelength Transparent Conductive Nanolattices
Source abstract
Abstract
Recent advancements with the directed assembly of block copolymers have enabled the fabrication over cm2 areas of highly ordered metal nanowire meshes, or nanolattices, which are of significant interest as transparent electrodes. Compared to randomly dispersed metal nanowire networks that have long been considered the most promising next-generation transparent electrode material, such ordered nanolattices represent a new design paradigm that is yet to be optimized. Here, through optical and electrical simulations, we explore the potential design parameters for such nanolattices as transparent conductive electrodes, elucidating relationships between the nanowire dimensions, defects, and the nanolattices' conductivity and transmissivity. We find that having an ordered nanowire network significantly decreases the length of nanowires required to attain both high transmissivity and high conductivity, and we quantify the network's tolerance to defects in relation to other design constraints. Furthermore, we explore how both optical and electrical anisotropy can be introduced to such nanolattices, opening an even broader materials design space and possible set of applications.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Baskin School of Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, United States
Funding
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20100318810.1002/adma.201003188 ↗
2. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.28210.1038/nphoton.2012.282 ↗
3. 10.1557/mrs.2011.23410.1557/mrs.2011.234 ↗
4. 10.1021/nl073296g10.1021/nl073296g ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20110087110.1002/adma.201100871 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.30.393310.1103/PhysRevB.30.3933 ↗
7. 10.1021/nn403324t10.1021/nn403324t ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0301910.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03019 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0171410.1021/acsnano.7b01714 ↗
10. 10.1038/ncomms352210.1038/ncomms3522 ↗
11. Geddes J. B. · 2015
12. 10.1021/nl102694a10.1021/nl102694a ↗
13. 10.1002/j.2168-0159.2014.tb00053.x10.1002/j.2168-0159.2014.tb00053.x ↗
14. Kumar, P.Organic Solar Cells: Device Physics, Processing, Degradation, and Prevention;CRC Press:Boca Raton, FL, 2016; p325.
15. 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.01.04310.1016/j.orgel.2016.01.043 ↗
16. 10.1038/ncomms844810.1038/ncomms8448 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20040064310.1002/adma.200400643 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20130345210.1002/adma.201303452 ↗
19. 10.1021/nl502416b10.1021/nl502416b ↗
20. 10.1038/nnano.2007.22710.1038/nnano.2007.227 ↗
21. Yee, T. D.; Watson, C. L.; Han, T. Y.J.; Hiszpanski, A. M.Metal Nanowire Arrays with Tunable Dimensions Fabricated via Block Copolymer Shear Alignment. Manuscript in preparation.
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.21430610.1103/PhysRevB.86.214306 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.02430110.1103/PhysRevB.79.024301 ↗
24. Steinhoegl W. · 2003 · 27
25. 10.1098/rspa.1950.007710.1098/rspa.1950.0077 ↗
26. 10.1017/S030500410001995210.1017/S0305004100019952 ↗
27. Alden, J. S.; Dai, H.; Knapp, M. R.; Na, S.; Pakbaz, H.; Pschenitzka, F.; Quan, X.; Spaid, M. A.; Winoto, A.; Wolk, J.Transparent Conductors Comprising Metal Nanowires. US Patent US 861853, Dec. 2010.
28. 10.1021/nn100523210.1021/nn1005232 ↗
29. 10.1039/C4AN00978A10.1039/C4AN00978A ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.677910.1103/PhysRevB.58.6779 ↗
31. 10.1155/2015/46089510.1155/2015/460895 ↗
32. Palik E. D. · 1998
33. 10.1021/nl101123910.1021/nl1011239 ↗
34. 10.1145/272991.27299510.1145/272991.272995 ↗