journal article·2024-08-28

Methotrexate-Loaded Chitosan Oligosaccharide-ES2 for Targeted Cancer Therapy

Wen Tang, Huiwen Hou, Hanlin Wang, Xinqing Gao, Feiyan Zhao, Yuhan Di, Shengli Ji, Peixue Ling, Fengshan Wang, Feng Sun, Haining Tan

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 34
Publisher page

Abstract

Cancer presents a significant health threat, necessitating the development of more precise, efficient, and less damaging treatment approaches. To address this challenge, we employed the 1-ethyl-(3-dimethyl aminopropyl) carbodiimide/ N -hydroxy succinimide (EDC/NHS) catalytic system and utilized quaternized chitosan oligosaccharide (HTCOSC) as a drug carrier to construct a nanoparticle delivery system termed HTCOSC-cRGD-ES2-MTX (CREM). This system specifically targets integrin αvβ3 on tumor cell surfaces and enables simultaneous loading of the antiangiogenic agent ES2 (IVRRADRAAVP) and the chemotherapy drug methotrexate (MTX). Due to its amphiphilic properties, CREM self-assembles into nanoparticles in aqueous solution, exhibiting an average diameter of 179.47 nm. Comparative studies demonstrated that CREM, in contrast to free ES2 and MTX-free nanoparticles (CRE), significantly suppressed the proliferation of EAhy926 endothelial cells and B16 melanoma cells in vitro, resulting in inhibition rates of 71.18 and 82.25%, respectively. Furthermore, CREM exhibited a hemolysis rate below 2%, indicating excellent in vitro antiangiogenic and antitumor activity as well as favorable blood compatibility. Additionally, both CRE and CREM demonstrated favorable tumor targeting capabilities through the specific binding action of cyclic RGD (cRGD) to integrin αvβ3. Further in vivo investigations revealed that CREM induced apoptosis in tumor cells via the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway and reduced the expression of angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), thereby inhibiting tumor angiogenesis. This potent antitumor effect was evident through a tumor suppression rate of 80.19%. Importantly, histopathological staining (HE staining) demonstrated the absence of significant toxic side effects of CREM on various organs compared to MTX. In conclusion, the CREM nano drug delivery system synergistically enhances the therapeutic efficacy of antiangiogenic drugs and chemotherapeutic agents, thus offering a novel targeted approach for cancer treatment.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Click Chemistry and Applications · RNA Interference and Gene Delivery · Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Glycoengineering Research Center, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, Shandong, China

NMPA Key Laboratory for Quality Research and Evaluation of Carbohydrate-Based Medicine, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China

Shandong Provincial Technology Innovation Center of Carbohydrate, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China

ReaLi Tide Biological Technology (Weihai) Co., Ltd, Weihai 264207, China

School of Pharmaceutical sciences, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · Key Technology Research and Development Program of Shandong Province · Foundation for Young Scholars of Shandong Province · Central Government Guide Local Science and Technology Development Funds

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1097/00000658-197203000-0001410.1097/00000658-197203000-00014 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.11.01510.1016/j.yexcr.2005.11.015 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81848-610.1016/S0092-8674(00)81848-6 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.08.03810.1016/j.jconrel.2018.08.038 ↗
5. 10.1074/jbc.M31292120010.1074/jbc.M312921200 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.biopha.2011.04.00710.1016/j.biopha.2011.04.007 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.05.01210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.05.012 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0141-8130(03)00021-710.1016/S0141-8130(03)00021-7 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.19210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.192 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.06.07610.1016/j.foodchem.2015.06.076 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.08910.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.089 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.04310.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.043 ↗
13. 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-016410.1634/theoncologist.2015-0164 ↗
14. 10.3390/cells1007168410.3390/cells10071684 ↗
15. 10.3390/ijms1904098210.3390/ijms19040982 ↗
16. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.69710.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.697 ↗
17. 10.1002/cbic.20200062610.1002/cbic.202000626 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.bmc.2019.07.03910.1016/j.bmc.2019.07.039 ↗
19. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.77363610.3389/fbioe.2021.773636 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.10.02810.1016/j.jconrel.2021.10.028 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.05.05710.1016/j.jcis.2019.05.057 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.12.00510.1016/j.jconrel.2005.12.005 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.02110.1016/j.cell.2019.01.021 ↗
24. 10.1002/1878-0261.1215510.1002/1878-0261.12155 ↗
25. 10.1023/a:100820972052610.1023/a:1008209720526 ↗
26. 10.1097/MOH.000000000000023910.1097/MOH.0000000000000239 ↗
27. 10.1002/jbm.a.3314810.1002/jbm.a.33148 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.03.01810.1016/j.ejpb.2015.03.018 ↗
29. 10.7150/thno.5782810.7150/thno.57828 ↗
30. 10.1038/nrd420110.1038/nrd4201 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.00810.1016/j.cell.2019.01.008 ↗
32. 10.3121/cmr.4.3.21810.3121/cmr.4.3.218 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.mvr.2020.10411410.1016/j.mvr.2020.104114 ↗
34. 10.3390/ijms2020502310.3390/ijms20205023 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.13710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.137 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.03.04810.1016/j.bbrc.2004.03.048 ↗
37. 10.1023/A:102675842923810.1023/A:1026758429238 ↗
38. 10.1186/1756-9966-30-8710.1186/1756-9966-30-87 ↗
39. 10.5483/BMBRep.2008.41.1.01110.5483/BMBRep.2008.41.1.011 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2005.07.00210.1016/j.bbadis.2005.07.002 ↗
41. 10.1016/S0960-9822(99)80295-410.1016/S0960-9822(99)80295-4 ↗
42. 10.1007/s00018-005-5565-610.1007/s00018-005-5565-6 ↗