journal article·2024-07-03Open access

Rigid Cyclic Fluorinated Detergents: Fine-Tuning the Hydrophilic–Lipophilic Balance Controls Self-Assembling and Biochemical Properties

Marine Soulié, Anais Deletraz, Moheddine Wehbie, Florian Mahler, Benjamin Chantemargue, Ilham Bouchemal, Aline Le Roy, Isabelle Petit-Härtlein, Franck Fieschi, Cécile Breyton, Christine Ebel, Sandro Keller, Grégory Durand

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 26

Abstract

We report herein the synthesis of three detergents bearing a perfluorinated cyclohexyl group connected through a short, hydrogenated spacer (i.e., propyl, butyl, or pentyl) to a β-maltoside polar head that are, respectively, called FCymal-3, FCymal-4, and FCymal-5. Increasing the length of the spacer decreased the critical micellar concentration (CMC), as demonstrated by surface tension (SFT) and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), from 5 mM for FCymal-3 to 0.7 mM for FCymal-5. The morphology of the micelles was studied by dynamic light scattering (DLS), analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC), and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), indicating heterogeneous rod-like shapes. While micelles of FCymal-3 and -4 have similar hydrodynamic diameters of ∼10 nm, those of FCymal-5 were twice as large. We also investigated the ability of the detergents to solubilize lipid membranes made of 1-palmitoyl-2-oleyl- sn -glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC). Molecular modeling indicated that the FCymal detergents generate disorder in lipid bilayers, with FCymal-3 being inserted more deeply into bilayers than FCymal-4 and -5. This was experimentally confirmed using POPC vesicles that were completely solubilized within 2 h with FCymal-3, whereas FCymal-5 required >8 h. A similar trend was noticed for the direct extraction of membrane proteins from E. coli membranes, with FCymal-3 being more potent than FCymal-5. An opposite trend was observed in terms of stabilization of the two model membrane proteins bacteriorhodopsin (bR) and SpNOX. In all three FCymal detergents, bR was stable for at least 2 months with no signs of aggregation. However, while the structural integrity of bR was fully preserved in FCymal-4 and -5, minor bleaching was observed in FCymal-3. Similarly, SpNOX exhibited the least activity in FCymal-3 and the highest activity in FCymal-5. By combining solubilizing and stabilizing potency, FCymal detergents push forward our expectations of the usefulness of fluorinated detergents for handling and investigating membrane proteins.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fluorine in Organic Chemistry · Chemical Synthesis and Analysis · Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institut des Biomolécules Max Mousseron (UMR 5247 UM-CNRS-ENSCM), Equipe Chimie Bioorganique et Systèmes amphiphiles, 301 Rue Baruch de Spinoza, 84916 Avignon Cedex 9, France

Avignon Université, Unité Propre de Recherche et d’Innovation, Equipe Synthèse et Systèmes Colloïdaux Bio-organiques, 301 Rue Baruch de Spinoza, 84916 Avignon Cedex 9, France

Molecular Biophysics, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern (TUK), Erwin-Schrödinger-Str. 13, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany

InSiliBio, 1 Avenue Ester Technopôle, Limoges 87069, France

Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CEA, CNRS, IBS, F-38000 Grenoble, France

Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), 75005 Paris, France

Biophysics, Institute of Molecular Biosciences (IMB), NAWI Graz, University of Graz, Humboldtstr. 50/III, 8010 Graz, Austria

Field of Excellence BioHealth, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria

BioTechMed-Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche · Austrian Science Fund · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-092115-02532210.1146/annurev-bioeng-092115-025322 ↗
2. 10.1042/BST2021018110.1042/BST20210181 ↗
3. 10.3390/ijms2201005010.3390/ijms22010050 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.sbi.2019.06.00210.1016/j.sbi.2019.06.002 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2018.11.00410.1016/j.bbagen.2018.11.004 ↗
6. Durand, G.; Abla, M.; Ebel, C.; Breyton, C. New Amphiphiles to Handle Membrane Proteins: “Ménage à Trois” Between Chemistry, Physical Chemistry, and Biochemistry. In Membrane Proteins Production for Structural Analysis, Mus-Veteau, I., Ed. Springer: New York, 2014; pp 205–251.10.1007/978-1-4939-0662-8_8 ↗
7. 10.1039/D2SC03130B10.1039/D2SC03130B ↗
8. 10.1002/chem.20220011610.1002/chem.202200116 ↗
9. 10.1021/jacs.0c0962910.1021/jacs.0c09629 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2021.18368610.1016/j.bbamem.2021.183686 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2020.10487010.1016/j.chemphyslip.2020.104870 ↗
12. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.052208.11405710.1146/annurev.biochem.052208.114057 ↗
13. 10.1002/anie.20141235910.1002/anie.201412359 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2018.05.02510.1016/j.ymeth.2018.05.025 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.biochi.2022.11.00310.1016/j.biochi.2022.11.003 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c0321410.1021/acs.langmuir.0c03214 ↗
17. 10.1002/smll.20210360310.1002/smll.202103603 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.pep.2012.08.01610.1016/j.pep.2012.08.016 ↗
19. 10.1073/pnas.94.20.1054710.1073/pnas.94.20.10547 ↗
20. 10.1107/S090744490101121010.1107/S0907444901011210 ↗
21. 10.1021/bi034986b10.1021/bi034986b ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2008.10.02010.1016/j.ymeth.2008.10.020 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.02.02410.1016/j.bpj.2014.02.024 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.crstbi.2021.03.00210.1016/j.crstbi.2021.03.002 ↗
25. 10.3109/09687688.2011.55244010.3109/09687688.2011.552440 ↗
26. Griffin W. C. · J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. · 1954 · 5 · 249
27. Griffin W. C. · J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. · 1949 · 1 · 311
28. Davies J. T. · Proc. Int. Congr. Surf. Act., 2nd · 1957 · 426
29. 10.1021/j100658a02010.1021/j100658a020 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsomega.1c0258110.1021/acsomega.1c02581 ↗
31. 10.1021/ac300752210.1021/ac3007522 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b0428110.1021/acs.analchem.9b04281 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76713-010.1016/S0006-3495(00)76713-0 ↗
34. Brautigam, C. A. Chapter Five - Calculations and Publication-Quality Illustrations for Analytical Ultracentrifugation Data. In Methods in Enzymology, Cole, J. L., Ed. Academic Press: 2015; Vol. 562, pp 109–133.10.1016/bs.mie.2015.05.001 ↗
35. Salvay A. G. · 2006 · 131
36. 10.1107/S002188989901521610.1107/S0021889899015216 ↗
37. 10.1107/S160057671700778610.1107/S1600576717007786 ↗
38. 10.1002/jcc.2370210.1002/jcc.23702 ↗
39. 10.1002/jcc.2003510.1002/jcc.20035 ↗
40. 10.1039/c0cp00111b10.1039/c0cp00111b ↗
41. 10.1021/ct300777p10.1021/ct300777p ↗
42. 10.1128/mBio.01487-1710.1128/mBio.01487-17 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2019.02.00310.1016/j.bbamem.2019.02.003 ↗
44. 10.1016/0021-9797(76)90178-810.1016/0021-9797(76)90178-8 ↗
45. 10.1073/pnas.71.5.181110.1073/pnas.71.5.1811 ↗
46. 10.1038/s41598-019-46686-810.1038/s41598-019-46686-8 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.05.05310.1016/j.bpj.2009.05.053 ↗
48. 10.1039/C5NJ03502C10.1039/C5NJ03502C ↗
49. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.08.07010.1016/j.bmcl.2006.08.070 ↗