journal article·2024-04-10

Efficient Control of Rhizoctonia solani Using Environmentally Friendly pH-Responsive Tannic Acid–Rosin Nano-Microcapsules

Xu Han, Shihao Gu, Renle Xu, Yue Kong, Yuhang Lou, Qifan Wang, Yanqing Gao, Shibin Shang, Zhanqian Song, Jie Song, Jian Li

Publisher page

Abstract

A nanomicrocapsule system was constructed through the polymerization of tannic acid (TA) and emulsifier OP-10 (OP-10), followed by the chelation of iron ions, to develop a safe and effective method for controlling Rhizoctonia solani in agriculture. The encapsulated active component is a rosin-based triazole derivative (RTD) previously synthesized by our research group (RTD@OP10-TA-Fe). The encapsulation efficiency of the nanomicrocapsules is 82.39%, with an effective compound loading capacity of 96.49%. Through the encapsulation of the RTD via nanomicrocapsules, we improved its water solubility, optimized its stability, and increased its adhesion to the leaf surface. Under acidic conditions (pH = 5.0), the release rate of nanomicrocapsules at 96 h is 96.31 ± 0.8%, which is 2.04 times higher than the release rate under normal conditions (pH = 7.0). Additionally, the results of in vitro and in vivo antifungal assays indicate that compared with the original compound, the nanomicrocapsules exhibit superior antifungal activity (EC 50 values of RTD and RTD@OP10-TA-Fe are 1.237 and 0.860 mg/L, respectively). The results of field efficacy trials indicate that compared with RTD, RTD@OP10-TA-Fe exhibits a more prolonged period of effectiveness. Even after 3 weeks, the antifungal rate of RTD@OP10-TA-Fe remains at 40%, whereas RTD, owing to degradation, shows an antifungal rate of 11.11% during the same period. Furthermore, safety assessment results indicate that compared with the control, RTD@OP10-TA-Fe has almost no impact on the growth of rice seedlings and exhibits low toxicity to zebrafish. This study provides valuable insights into controlling R. solani and enhancing the compound performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements · Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics · Microbial Applications in Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Biomass Energy and Materials, College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, People’s Republic of China

College of Plant Protection, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, People’s Republic of China

Institute of Chemical Industry of Forest Products, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210042, People’s Republic of China

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Michigan-Flint, Flint, Michigan 48502, United States

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Shaanxi Province

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s00425-019-03246-810.1007/s00425-019-03246-8 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.funbio.2018.02.00310.1016/j.funbio.2018.02.003 ↗
3. 10.1371/journal.pone.017746410.1371/journal.pone.0177464 ↗
4. 10.1111/ppa.1273310.1111/ppa.12733 ↗
5. 10.1038/ncomms242710.1038/ncomms2427 ↗
6. 10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.5.55710.1094/PDIS.2004.88.5.557 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cropro.2008.12.00410.1016/j.cropro.2008.12.004 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c0056210.1021/acs.jafc.0c00562 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c0188710.1021/acs.jafc.1c01887 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.10.03210.1016/j.indcrop.2015.10.032 ↗
11. 10.15376/biores.7.2.1961-197110.15376/biores.7.2.1961-1971 ↗
12. 10.1515/hf-2013-012410.1515/hf-2013-0124 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.07.06710.1016/j.indcrop.2015.07.067 ↗
14. 10.1007/s11030-016-9691-x10.1007/s11030-016-9691-x ↗
15. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.00710.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.007 ↗
16. 10.1021/jf502537x10.1021/jf502537x ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c0702810.1021/acs.jafc.0c07028 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0431710.1021/acsnano.1c04317 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0751710.1021/acsnano.2c07517 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsnano.0c1087710.1021/acsnano.0c10877 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0972410.1021/acsnano.1c09724 ↗
22. 10.1039/D1TB00383F10.1039/D1TB00383F ↗
23. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11609610.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116096 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.9b1909710.1021/acsami.9b19097 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.2c1089910.1021/acsami.2c10899 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.14742210.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147422 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14240310.1016/j.cej.2023.142403 ↗
28. 10.1039/C1CS15189D10.1039/C1CS15189D ↗
29. 10.1021/jacs.5b1012710.1021/jacs.5b10127 ↗
30. 10.1002/anie.20150940110.1002/anie.201509401 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsnano.0c1087710.1021/acsnano.0c10877 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsami.2c2324110.1021/acsami.2c23241 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.3c0841310.1021/acsami.3c08413 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsami.3c0753010.1021/acsami.3c07530 ↗
35. 10.1166/jbn.2010.109910.1166/jbn.2010.1099 ↗
36. 10.1002/sia.74010020310.1002/sia.740100203 ↗
37. 10.1016/0021-9517(92)90295-S10.1016/0021-9517(92)90295-S ↗
38. 10.1088/0022-3727/16/5/00510.1088/0022-3727/16/5/005 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.13564510.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135645 ↗
40. 10.1002/elsc.20160017210.1002/elsc.201600172 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.cis.2020.10226710.1016/j.cis.2020.102267 ↗
42. 10.1002/adfm.20190747810.1002/adfm.201907478 ↗