journal article·2024-12-25Open access

Broadly Accessible 3D In Vitro Skin Model as a Comprehensive Platform for Antibacterial Therapy Screening

Simona Villata, Désirée Baruffaldi, Raquel Cue Lopez, Camilla Paoletti, Paula Bosch, Lucia Napione, Andrea M. Giovannozzi, Candido Fabrizio Pirri, Enrique Martinez-Campos, Francesca Frascella

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 51

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Skin infections are currently a worldwide emergency as antibiotic-resistant bacteria are spreading, leading to the ineffectiveness of most antibiotics and antibacterial strategies. Consequently, there is an urgency of developing and testing innovative antibacterial therapies. As traditional 2D cell culture and planktonic bacteria culture can be obsolete due to their incapability of resembling the complex infection environment, 3D in vitro skin models can be a powerful tool to test and validate therapies. In this article, a 3D in vitro epidermis–dermis skin model has been developed and biofabricated to be broadly available, reaching a balance between the simplicity and reproducibility of the model and its complexity in terms of wound, infection, and treatment response. The results are really promising, as the skin model developed a comprehensive physical barrier. To further investigate the skin model, controlled wounding, infection, and antibiotic treatments were performed. The results were remarkable: Not only was the unwounded epidermal barrier able to partially stop the bacterial proliferation, but the entire system reacted to both wound and infection in a complex and complete way. Extracellular matrix deposition and remodeling, inflammatory response, antimicrobial peptide production, and change in cellular behaviors, from epithelial to mesenchymal and from fibroblasts to myofibroblasts, were witnessed, with different extents depending on the bacterial strain. In addition, the inflammatory response to the antibiotic administration was opposite for the two bacterial infections, probably revealing the release of inflammatory endotoxins during Escherichia coli death. In conclusion, the presented 3D in vitro skin model has all the characteristics to be a future landmark as a platform for antibacterial strategy therapy testing.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ocular Infections and Treatments · Image Processing Techniques and Applications · Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Dipartimento di Scienza Applicata e Tecnologia, PolitoBIOMed Lab, Politecnico di Torino

Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica e Aerospaziale

Politecnico di Torino

Departamento de Química Macromolecular Aplicada, Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología de Polímeros

Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

Quantum Metrology and Nano Technologies Division

National Institute of Metrological Research

Center for Sustainable Futures, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia

Grupo de Síntesis Orgánica y Bioevaluación

Instituto Pluridisciplinar (UCM)

Funding

Ministero dell???Istruzione, dell???Universit?? e della Ricerca

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/exd.1353110.1111/exd.13531 ↗
2. 10.3390/biom1301005510.3390/biom13010055 ↗
3. 10.3390/mi1203029410.3390/mi12030294 ↗
4. 10.1002/smll.20200251510.1002/smll.202002515 ↗
5. 10.1111/cts.1306610.1111/cts.13066 ↗
6. 10.1002/adhm.20180101910.1002/adhm.201801019 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.07.03310.1016/j.actbio.2021.07.033 ↗
8. 10.3390/ijms2206303510.3390/ijms22063035 ↗
9. 10.1155/2015/17042710.1155/2015/170427 ↗
10. 10.2147/DMSO.S28678710.2147/DMSO.S286787 ↗
11. 10.1002/adhm.20230101510.1002/adhm.202301015 ↗
12. 10.1038/jid.2012.36410.1038/jid.2012.364 ↗
13. 10.3858/emm.2009.41.12.09610.3858/emm.2009.41.12.096 ↗
14. 10.1002/adhm.20230039510.1002/adhm.202300395 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.bprint.2023.e0031010.1016/j.bprint.2023.e00310 ↗
16. 10.1002/pol.2024003710.1002/pol.20240037 ↗
17. 10.3389/fbioe.2024.138301010.3389/fbioe.2024.1383010 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsabm.0c0147210.1021/acsabm.0c01472 ↗
19. 10.1586/14787210.2015.102329110.1586/14787210.2015.1023291 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.pop.2018.05.00410.1016/j.pop.2018.05.004 ↗
21. 10.2340/00015555-346610.2340/00015555-3466 ↗
22. 10.1080/09205063.2020.181766710.1080/09205063.2020.1817667 ↗
23. 10.1111/iwj.1204910.1111/iwj.12049 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cocis.2023.10170110.1016/j.cocis.2023.101701 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.09.02410.1016/j.jaad.2021.09.024 ↗
26. 10.3390/ijms2103106110.3390/ijms21031061 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.addr.2022.11437810.1016/j.addr.2022.114378 ↗
28. 10.3390/antibiotics902005610.3390/antibiotics9020056 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.12257810.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.122578 ↗
30. 10.3389/fcimb.2021.71236010.3389/fcimb.2021.712360 ↗
31. 10.1111/iwj.1481110.1111/iwj.14811 ↗
32. 10.1371/journal.pone.016038710.1371/journal.pone.0160387 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.10976410.1016/j.msec.2019.109764 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.08410.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.084 ↗
35. 10.1038/s41598-021-82963-110.1038/s41598-021-82963-1 ↗
36. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.0224210.3389/fmicb.2019.02242 ↗
37. 10.1021/bm990017d10.1021/bm990017d ↗
38. 10.4103/ijofb.ijofb_3_1810.4103/ijofb.ijofb_3_18 ↗
39. 10.1007/s12272-021-01305-x10.1007/s12272-021-01305-x ↗
40. 10.1111/cea.1244310.1111/cea.12443 ↗
41. 10.1091/mbc.11.2.45310.1091/mbc.11.2.453 ↗
42. 10.1002/adhm.20150000510.1002/adhm.201500005 ↗
43. 10.1111/jdv.1812310.1111/jdv.18123 ↗
44. 10.4103/tjps.TJPS_2_1710.4103/tjps.TJPS_2_17 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.addr.2020.09.00510.1016/j.addr.2020.09.005 ↗
46. 10.1111/iwj.1210910.1111/iwj.12109 ↗
47. 10.3390/bioengineering805006310.3390/bioengineering8050063 ↗
48. 10.3390/bioengineering908034010.3390/bioengineering9080340 ↗
49. Kandhwal M. · Role of Matrix Metalloproteinase in Wound Healing · 2022 · 14
50. 10.3390/polym1209193010.3390/polym12091930 ↗
51. 10.3389/fcell.2021.68241410.3389/fcell.2021.682414 ↗
52. 10.3390/cells1113210010.3390/cells11132100 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2022.02.02710.1016/j.semcdb.2022.02.027 ↗
54. 10.1007/s00441-016-2464-010.1007/s00441-016-2464-0 ↗
55. 10.1002/dvdy10.1002/dvdy ↗
56. 10.1177/153537021559719410.1177/1535370215597194 ↗
57. 10.3390/ijms2122879010.3390/ijms21228790 ↗
58. 10.1111/srt.1262610.1111/srt.12626 ↗
59. 10.1371/journal.pone.008280010.1371/journal.pone.0082800 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jdds.2016.09.00110.1016/j.jdds.2016.09.001 ↗
61. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.105886210.3389/fimmu.2022.1058862 ↗
62. 10.3390/biomedicines805010110.3390/biomedicines8050101 ↗
63. 10.1089/wound.2013.051710.1089/wound.2013.0517 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2017.10.01610.1016/j.toxicon.2017.10.016 ↗
65. 10.1093/jac/31.3.37310.1093/jac/31.3.373 ↗
66. Kirikae T. · Biological Characterization of Endotoxins Released from Antibiotic-Treated Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Escherichia Coli · 1998 · 42