Probing the Nanostructure and Reactivity of Epoxy–Amine Interphases
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Understanding and controlling the structure of interphase regions in epoxy resins have been a long-standing goal in high-performance composite and coating development, since these are widely considered to be weak points in the microstructure of these materials, determining key properties such as fracture strength and barrier performance. These buried nanoscale regions are, however, inaccessible to conventional analytical techniques, and little is understood about their underlying formation mechanism. Here, we combine molecular dynamics (MD) simulation with nanoscale infrared chemical mapping to develop new understanding of the interphase using model epoxy–amine binders composed of diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (DGEBA) cross-linked using m -xylylenediamine (MXDA). Iron oxide powders are used as exemplary surfaces, where we demonstrate that the electrostatic binding energies between the amine cross-linker and particles range from repulsive (magnetite, Fe 3 O 4 ) to weakly attractive (hematite, Fe 2 O 3 ) to strong immobilization (goethite, FeOOH). We find that interfacial binding occurs upon mixing and determines the overall level of residual amine content in the bulk matrix but does not correlate with a detectable amine depletion in the vicinity of particles. In all cases, an excess of both epoxy and amine functionality is detected close to particles, and the extent of matrix undercuring is found to be dependent on the entropic segregation of the unreacted material during the ambient cure. Detailed MD simulations demonstrate that spatial segregation of the unreacted precursors is expected in the interphase, leading to the experimental observation that, even after extensive postcure heating, individual particles remain embedded in a nanoscale underdeveloped environment.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Corrosion@Manchester, Department of Materials, The University of Manchester, Nancy Rothwell Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, U.K.
Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Manchester, Nancy Rothwell Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, U.K.
AkzoNobel Powder Coatings, Stoneygate Lane, Felling, Gateshead, Tyne & Wear NE10 0JY, U.K.
AkzoNobel, Rijksstraatweg 31, 2171 AJ Sassenheim, The Netherlands
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · AkzoNobel
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.10534010.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.105340 ↗
2. 10.1080/0021846950801518810.1080/00218469508015188 ↗
3. 10.1021/ma990990c10.1021/ma990990c ↗
4. 10.1080/0021846060087577110.1080/00218460600875771 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsanm.9b0038710.1021/acsanm.9b00387 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.01.01610.1016/j.jcis.2022.01.016 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsami.2c1233510.1021/acsami.2c12335 ↗
8. 10.1039/D0SM01600D10.1039/D0SM01600D ↗
9. 10.1021/acsapm.9b0115410.1021/acsapm.9b01154 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.15538010.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155380 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10817110.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRev.159.9810.1103/PhysRev.159.98 ↗
13. 10.1103/physrevb.69.13410310.1103/physrevb.69.134103 ↗
14. Hockney R. W. · 198810.1887/0852743920 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.47959510.1063/1.479595 ↗
16. Blake R. L. · Am. Mineral. · 1966 · 51 · 123
17. Weschler B. A. · Am. Mineral. · 1984 · 69 · 754
18. 10.2138/am-1999-5-62410.2138/am-1999-5-624 ↗
19. 10.1039/c1jm10381d10.1039/c1jm10381d ↗
20. 10.1016/j.gca.2009.12.01510.1016/j.gca.2009.12.015 ↗
21. 10.1016/S1872-5813(10)60024-210.1016/S1872-5813(10)60024-2 ↗
22. 10.1103/physrevlett.94.12610110.1103/physrevlett.94.126101 ↗
23. 10.1021/jp036328710.1021/jp0363287 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.gca.2011.01.02610.1016/j.gca.2011.01.026 ↗
25. 10.1073/pnas.040803710210.1073/pnas.0408037102 ↗
26. 10.1093/nar/gkx31210.1093/nar/gkx312 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b0027210.1021/acs.jpcb.7b00272 ↗
28. 10.1002/jcc.2122410.1002/jcc.21224 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.16684110.1016/j.jmb.2021.166841 ↗
30. 10.1039/C5SM02788H10.1039/C5SM02788H ↗
31. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.09.03810.1016/j.polymer.2017.09.038 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c0201210.1021/acs.macromol.0c02012 ↗
33. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0518(19980430)36:6<1001::AID-POLA15>3.0.CO;2-910.1002/(SICI)1099-0518(19980430)36:6<1001::AID-POLA15>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
34. Gowers, R.; Linke, M.; Barnoud, J.; Reddy, T.; Melo, M.; Seyler, S.; Domański, J.; Dotson, D.; Buchoux, S.; Kenney, I.; Beckstein, O. MDAnalysis: A Python Package for the Rapid Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Proceedings of the 15th Python in Science Conference (SciPy 2016) 2016; pp 98–105.10.25080/Majora-629e541a-00e ↗
35. 10.1109/MCSE.2007.5510.1109/MCSE.2007.55 ↗
36. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-510.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0044810.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00448 ↗
38. 10.1002/smll.20120078810.1002/smll.201200788 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.03.01910.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.03.019 ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b0066510.1021/acs.analchem.6b00665 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.06.06110.1016/j.carbon.2018.06.061 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b0079810.1021/acs.analchem.6b00798 ↗
43. Lin-Vien D. · 1991
44. 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.11.05010.1016/j.polymer.2016.11.050 ↗
45. 10.1002/pola.1995.08033040910.1002/pola.1995.080330409 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsami.5b1076710.1021/acsami.5b10767 ↗
47. 10.1039/D4LF00042K10.1039/D4LF00042K ↗
48. 10.1021/acsami.7b0063810.1021/acsami.7b00638 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2022.10722310.1016/j.porgcoat.2022.107223 ↗
50. 10.1063/5.006390210.1063/5.0063902 ↗
51. 10.1039/C7TA06642B10.1039/C7TA06642B ↗
52. 10.1021/ma00217a00910.1021/ma00217a009 ↗
53. 10.1140/epje/i2017-11575-710.1140/epje/i2017-11575-7 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.vibspec.2019.10299310.1016/j.vibspec.2019.102993 ↗