journal article·2024-09-11Open access

Development and Characterization of N2O-Plasma Oxide Layers for High-Temperature p-Type Passivating Contacts in Silicon Solar Cells

Sofia Libraro, Lars J. Bannenberg, Theodosios Famprikis, David Reyes, Julien Hurni, Ezgi Genc, Christophe Ballif, Aïcha Hessler-Wyser, Franz-Josef Haug, Audrey Morisset

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 36

Abstract

Full-area passivating contacts based on SiO x /poly-Si stacks are key for the new generation of industrial silicon solar cells substituting the passivated emitter and rear cell (PERC) technology. Demonstrating a potential efficiency increase of 1 to 2% compared to PERC, the utilization of n-type wafers with an n-type contact at the back and a p-type diffused boron emitter has become the industry standard in 2024. In this work, variations of this technology are explored, considering p-type passivating contacts on p-type Si wafers formed via a rapid thermal processing (RTP) step. These contacts could be useful in conjunction with n-type contacts for realizing solar cells with passivating contacts on both sides. Here, a particular focus is set on investigating the influence of the applied thermal treatment on the interfacial silicon oxide (SiO x ) layer. Thin SiO x layers formed via ultraviolet (UV)–O 3 exposure are compared with layers obtained through a plasma treatment with nitrous oxide (N 2 O). This process is performed in the same plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) chamber used to grow the Si-based passivating layer, resulting in a streamlined process flow. For both oxide types, the influence of the RTP thermal budget on passivation quality and contact resistivity is investigated. Whereas the UV–O 3 oxide shows a pronounced degradation when using high thermal budget annealing ( T > 860 °C), the N 2 O–plasma oxide exhibits instead an excellent passivation quality under these conditions. Simultaneously, the contact resistivity achieved with the N 2 O-plasma oxide layer is comparable to that yielded by UV–O 3 -grown oxides. To unravel the mechanisms behind the improved performance obtained with the N 2 O-plasma oxide at high thermal budget, characterization by high-resolution (scanning) transmission electron microscopy (HR-(S)TEM), X-ray reflectometry (XRR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is conducted on layer stacks featuring both N 2 O and UV–O 3 oxides after RTP. A breakup of the UV–O 3 oxide at high thermal budget is observed, whereas the N 2 O oxide is found to maintain its structural integrity along the interface. Furthermore, chemical analysis reveals that the N 2 O oxide is richer in oxygen and contains a higher amount of nitrogen compared to the UV–O 3 oxide. These distinguishing characteristics can be directly linked to the enhanced stability exhibited by the N 2 O oxide under higher annealing temperatures and extended dwell times.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Semiconductor materials and interfaces

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Institute of Electrical and Microengineering (IEM), Photovoltaics and Thin-Film Electronics Laboratory (PV-Lab), Maladière 71b, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland

Department of Radiation Science and Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, 2629JB Delft, The Netherlands

Interdisciplinary Centre for Electron Microscopy, EPFL, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

CSEM Sustainable Energy Center, Jaquet-Droz 1, 2002 Neuchâtel, Switzerland

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur F?rderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung · Horizon 2020 Framework Programme · HORIZON EUROPE Climate, Energy and Mobility · Swiss Federal Office for Energie (OFEN)

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.09.01710.1016/j.solmat.2013.09.017 ↗
2. JinkoSolar JinkoSolar’s High-efficiency N-Type Monocrystalline Silicon Solar Cell Sets Our New Record with Maximum Conversion Efficiency of 26.4%, 2024 https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/jinkosolars-high-efficiency-n-type-monocrystalline-silicon-solar-cell-sets-our-new-record-with-maximum-conversion-efficiency-of-26-4-301700102.html. (accessed June 25, 2024).
3. 10.1016/j.solmat.2014.05.03910.1016/j.solmat.2014.05.039 ↗
4. Gan, J. Y.; Swanson, R. M. In Polysilicon Emitters for Silicon Concentrator Solar Cells, IEEE Conference on Photovoltaiv Specialists; IEEE, 1990; pp 245–250.10.1109/PVSC.1990.111625 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.solmat.2014.06.00310.1016/j.solmat.2014.06.003 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.06.03910.1016/j.solmat.2017.06.039 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.503761010.1063/1.5037610 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.solmat.2022.11189010.1016/j.solmat.2022.111890 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.6b1271410.1021/acsami.6b12714 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.solmat.2020.11071310.1016/j.solmat.2020.110713 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.solmat.2020.11089910.1016/j.solmat.2020.110899 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.162172010.1063/1.1621720 ↗
13. 10.1002/pssr.20140931210.1002/pssr.201409312 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.06.04810.1016/j.solmat.2015.06.048 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.10991210.1016/j.solmat.2019.109912 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.08.06710.1016/j.egypro.2014.08.067 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.07.12310.1016/j.egypro.2016.07.123 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.06.03910.1016/j.solmat.2018.06.039 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.171394510.1063/1.1713945 ↗
20. 10.1021/jp208256610.1021/jp2082566 ↗
21. 10.1021/jp400433u10.1021/jp400433u ↗
22. 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.27310.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.273 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2017.03.03510.1016/j.vacuum.2017.03.035 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.11038910.1016/j.solmat.2019.110389 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0026510.1021/acsaem.1c00265 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.solmat.2023.11235410.1016/j.solmat.2023.112354 ↗
27. 10.1002/pip.352210.1002/pip.3522 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.10775410.1063/1.107754 ↗
29. 10.1002/solr.20230018610.1002/solr.202300186 ↗
30. 10.1116/1.57974910.1116/1.579749 ↗
31. 10.1002/solr.20230091910.1002/solr.202300919 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41560-018-0239-410.1038/s41560-018-0239-4 ↗
33. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.293988010.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2939880 ↗
34. David, L.; Hübner, S.; Min, B.; Hollemann, C.; Dippell, T.; Wohlfart, P.; Peibst, R.; Brendel, R.Fired-Only Passivating Poly-Si on Oxide Contacts with DC-Sputtered In Situ Phosphorous-Doped Silicon Layers. In 37th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition; EU PVSEC, 2020; pp 184–187.
35. 10.1016/j.solmat.2020.11080910.1016/j.solmat.2020.110809 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.11001810.1016/j.solmat.2019.110018 ↗
37. 10.1109/LED.2013.229060210.1109/LED.2013.2290602 ↗
38. 10.1107/S160057672200665310.1107/S1600576722006653 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsami.2c0122510.1021/acsami.2c01225 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.solmat.2023.11259110.1016/j.solmat.2023.112591 ↗
41. Chastain J. · 1992
42. 10.1063/1.33821510.1063/1.338215 ↗
43. 10.1116/1.58037310.1116/1.580373 ↗
44. 10.1016/0169-4332(93)90431-A10.1016/0169-4332(93)90431-A ↗