journal article·2024-04-27Open access

Applicability of Single-Layer Graphene as a Hydrogen-Blocking Interlayer in Low-Temperature PEMFCs

Miriam Komma, Anna T. S. Freiberg, Dunia Abbas, Funda Arslan, Maja Milosevic, Serhiy Cherevko, Simon Thiele, Thomas Böhm

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Gas crossover is critical in proton exchange membrane (PEM)-based electrochemical systems. Recently, single-layer graphene (SLG) has gained great research interest due to its outstanding properties as a barrier layer for small molecules like hydrogen. However, the applicability of SLG as a gas-blocking interlayer in PEMs has yet to be fully understood. In this work, two different approaches for transferring SLG from a copper or a polymeric substrate onto PEMs are compared regarding their application in low-temperature PEM fuel cells. The SLG is sandwiched between two Nafion XL membranes to form a stable composite membrane. The successful transfer is confirmed by Raman spectroscopy and in ex situ hydrogen permeation experiments in the dry state, where a reduction of 50% upon SLG incorporation is achieved. The SLG composite membranes are characterized by their performance and hydrogen-blocking ability in a fuel cell setup at typical operating conditions of 80 °C and with fully humidified gases. The performance of the fuel cell incorporating an SLG composite membrane is equal to that of the reference cell when avoiding the direct etching process from a copper substrate, as remnants from copper etching deteriorate the performance of the fuel cell. For both transfer processes, the hydrogen crossover reduction of SLG composite membranes is only 15–19% (1.5 bar abs ) in the operating fuel cell. Further, hydrogen pumping experiments suggest that the barrier function of SLG impairs the water transport through the membrane, which may affect water management in electrochemical applications. In summary, this work shows the successful transfer of SLG into a PEM and confirms the effective hydrogen-blocking capability of the SLG interlayer. However, the hydrogen-blocking ability is significantly reduced when running the cell at the typical humidified operating conditions of PEM fuel cells, which follows from a combination of reversible interlayer alteration upon humidification and irreversible defect formation upon PEM fuel cell operation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK-11), Cauerstr.1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Cauerstr.1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung · Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1186/s42500-019-0008-310.1186/s42500-019-0008-3 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.est.2023.10684210.1016/j.est.2023.106842 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.00610.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.006 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0015910.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00159 ↗
5. 10.1002/aenm.20160121610.1002/aenm.201601216 ↗
6. 10.1002/smll.20190370510.1002/smll.201903705 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0169110.1021/acsanm.1c01691 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.01310.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.013 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.02.14210.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.02.142 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.03010.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.030 ↗
11. 10.1002/ese3.83310.1002/ese3.833 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.12928010.1016/j.cej.2021.129280 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.05510.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.055 ↗
14. 10.1021/nl801457b10.1021/nl801457b ↗
15. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.05.05210.1016/j.carbon.2013.05.052 ↗
16. 10.1038/nature1401510.1038/nature14015 ↗
17. 10.1039/D3MA00180F10.1039/D3MA00180F ↗
18. 10.1149/09208.0439ecst10.1149/09208.0439ecst ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.3c1265010.1021/acsami.3c12650 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsanm.8b0227010.1021/acsanm.8b02270 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.05.00910.1016/j.jelechem.2017.05.009 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0415510.1021/acs.jpcc.5b04155 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.02310.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.023 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10682910.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106829 ↗
25. 10.1021/jacs.7b1085310.1021/jacs.7b10853 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0177510.1021/acsaem.9b01775 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.06.00410.1016/j.memsci.2016.06.004 ↗
28. 10.1039/C9RA02689D10.1039/C9RA02689D ↗
29. 10.1021/ja01151a02410.1021/ja01151a024 ↗
30. 10.1149/1.240062610.1149/1.2400626 ↗
31. 10.1149/2.0161806jes10.1149/2.0161806jes ↗
32. 10.1149/1.314396510.1149/1.3143965 ↗
33. 10.1149/1.188836710.1149/1.1888367 ↗
34. 10.1149/1945-7111/abaa6810.1149/1945-7111/abaa68 ↗
35. 10.1149/2.0051907jes10.1149/2.0051907jes ↗
36. 10.1021/nl203359n10.1021/nl203359n ↗
37. 10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.00310.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.003 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.12710.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.127 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.03.09710.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.03.097 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.12.01210.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.12.012 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.11710.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.117 ↗
42. 10.1149/1.296492410.1149/1.2964924 ↗
43. 10.1002/fuce.20130021510.1002/fuce.201300215 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.08510.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.085 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.08.01810.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.08.018 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.02.07110.1016/j.polymer.2006.02.071 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.09.07710.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.09.077 ↗