Piezoresistive Fibers with Large Working Factors for Strain Sensing Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Piezoresistive fibers with large working factors remain of great interest for strain sensing applications involving large strains, yet difficult to achieve. Here, we produced strain-sensitive fibers with large working factors by dip-coating nanocomposite piezoresistive inks on surface-modified polyether block amide (PEBA) fibers. Surface modification of neat PEBA fibers was carried out with polydopamine (PDA) while nanocomposite conductive inks consisted of styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS) elastomer and carbon black (CB). As such, the deposition of piezoresistive coatings was enabled through nonconventional hydrogen-bonding interactions. The resultant fibers demonstrated well-defined piezoresistive linear relationships, which increased with CB filler loading in SEBS. In addition, gauge factors decreased with increasing CB mass fractions from ∼15 to ∼7. Furthermore, we used the fatigue theory to predict the endurance limit (Ce) of our fibers toward resistance signal stability. Such a piezoresistive performance allowed us to explore the application of our fibers as strain sensors for monitoring the movement of finger joints.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Conducting polymers and applications · Polydiacetylene-based materials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory for Modification of Chemical Fibers and Polymer Materials, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai201620, China
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Sussex, BrightonBN19QH, U.K.
Funding
Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Program of Shanghai Technology Research Leader
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41928-022-00723-z10.1038/s41928-022-00723-z ↗
2. 10.1039/c9sm01046g10.1039/c9sm01046g ↗
3. 10.1021/acsami.1c2162310.1021/acsami.1c21623 ↗
4. 10.1002/adfm.20200243310.1002/adfm.202002433 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsanm.0c0236210.1021/acsanm.0c02362 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0684710.1021/acsnano.9b06847 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.06.07810.1016/j.carbon.2020.06.078 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.1c1995010.1021/acsami.1c19950 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41586-020-2892-610.1038/s41586-020-2892-6 ↗
10. Vanlanduit, S.; Sorgente, M.; Zadeh, A. R.; Güemes, A.; Faisal, N. Strain Monitoring BT─Structural Health Monitoring Damage Detection Systems for Aerospace, Sause, M. G. R.; Jasiu̅nienė, E., Eds. Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2021; pp 219–241.10.1007/978-3-030-72192-3_8 ↗
11. 10.1007/s40430-013-0082-210.1007/s40430-013-0082-2 ↗
12. 10.1007/s00339-008-4623-y10.1007/s00339-008-4623-y ↗
13. O’Driscoll D. P. · 2021
14. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0161310.1021/acsnano.9b01613 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.aag287910.1126/science.aag2879 ↗
16. 10.1002/smll.20200654210.1002/smll.202006542 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0004010.1021/acsanm.1c00040 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10915310.1016/j.compscitech.2021.109153 ↗
19. 10.1021/acssensors.0c0087010.1021/acssensors.0c00870 ↗
20. 10.1002/smll.20200215810.1002/smll.202002158 ↗
21. 10.1002/adfm.20191050410.1002/adfm.201910504 ↗
22. 10.1039/c8mh01062e10.1039/c8mh01062e ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.5b0489210.1021/acsami.5b04892 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.9b1554610.1021/acsami.9b15546 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13500310.1016/j.cej.2022.135003 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.482649610.1063/1.4826496 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.2c0477310.1021/acsami.2c04773 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsapm.2c0129210.1021/acsapm.2c01292 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10971510.1016/j.matdes.2021.109715 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsami.1c0086410.1021/acsami.1c00864 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0927-796X(02)00004-910.1016/S0927-796X(02)00004-9 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsami.7b1986510.1021/acsami.7b19865 ↗
33. 10.1002/smll.20210290310.1002/smll.202102903 ↗
34. 10.1126/science.114724110.1126/science.1147241 ↗
35. 10.1002/aelm.20210023310.1002/aelm.202100233 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsami.9b1924210.1021/acsami.9b19242 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsami.8b1882310.1021/acsami.8b18823 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsami.2c1212010.1021/acsami.2c12120 ↗
39. 10.3390/polym1202025310.3390/polym12020253 ↗
40. 10.1002/adma.20190750510.1002/adma.201907505 ↗
41. 10.1007/s00289-016-1735-y10.1007/s00289-016-1735-y ↗
42. 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90471-810.1016/0022-2836(88)90471-8 ↗
43. 10.1002/jcc.2158210.1002/jcc.21582 ↗
44. 10.1021/jacs.8b0761710.1021/jacs.8b07617 ↗
45. Szalewicz K. · 2003
46. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e0215510.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02155 ↗
47. 10.1021/ja056454j10.1021/ja056454j ↗
48. 10.1021/ja00064a05510.1021/ja00064a055 ↗
49. 10.1038/359710a010.1038/359710a0 ↗
50. 10.1016/0014-5793(86)80730-X10.1016/0014-5793(86)80730-X ↗
51. 10.1038/366413a010.1038/366413a0 ↗
52. 10.1006/jmbi.1994.137010.1006/jmbi.1994.1370 ↗
53. 10.5194/mr-2-765-202110.5194/mr-2-765-2021 ↗
54. 10.1039/a827163z10.1039/a827163z ↗
55. 10.1002/ange.20150210310.1002/ange.201502103 ↗
56. 10.1038/s41598-019-56607-410.1038/s41598-019-56607-4 ↗
57. 10.1021/acsami.6b1307410.1021/acsami.6b13074 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.02810.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.028 ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0194510.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01945 ↗
60. 10.1038/nature0496910.1038/nature04969 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.12.02310.1016/j.carbon.2015.12.023 ↗
62. 10.1038/s41467-022-34631-910.1038/s41467-022-34631-9 ↗
63. 10.1021/acsapm.0c0051010.1021/acsapm.0c00510 ↗
64. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c0117110.1021/acssuschemeng.2c01171 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.coco.2021.10073510.1016/j.coco.2021.100735 ↗
66. 10.1002/mame.20200036110.1002/mame.202000361 ↗