Deep Learning Extraction of the Temperature-Dependent Parameters of Bulk Defects
Source abstract
Abstract
Bulk defects in silicon solar cells are a key contributor to loss of efficiency. To detect and identify those defects, temperature- and injection-dependent lifetime spectroscopy is usually used, and the defect parameters are traditionally extracted using fitting methods to the Shockley-Read-Hall recombination statistics. In this study, we propose a deep learning-based extraction technique that is based on an alternative representation of the lifetime curves: lifetime mapping in the temperature and minority carrier concentration space. The deep learning approach successfully predicts all the defect parameters while addressing one of the main limitations of the traditional approach of locating the defect in the energy spectrum, which usually outputs two possible solutions. Furthermore, the approach is applied to temperature-dependent defect parameters where the traditional approach is not applicable, achieving satisfying levels of prediction of the defect parameters. Image representation and deep learning have the potential to bolster solar cell characterization techniques by extracting more insights from the characterization data.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis · Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
UNSW, School of Photovoltaic and Renewable Energy Engineering, Sydney, 2052NSW, Australia
UNSW, School of Mathematics and Statistics, Sydney, 2052NSW, Australia
Funding
Australian Renewable Energy Agency
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Masson-Delmotte V. · 2018
2. 10.1088/2516-1083/ab0fa810.1088/2516-1083/ab0fa8 ↗
3. 10.1109/PVSC-Vol2.2012.665677910.1109/PVSC-Vol2.2012.6656779 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRev.87.83510.1103/PhysRev.87.835 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRev.87.38710.1103/PhysRev.87.387 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.156383010.1063/1.1563830 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.512390110.1063/1.5123901 ↗
8. Rein S. · 200510.1007/3-540-27922-9 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.496312110.1063/1.4963121 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.189748910.1063/1.1897489 ↗
11. 10.1109/PVSC.2009.541138010.1109/PVSC.2009.5411380 ↗
12. 10.1002/pssb.20160036310.1002/pssb.201600363 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.11153010.1016/j.solmat.2021.111530 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.472547510.1063/1.4725475 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.497790610.1063/1.4977906 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.243374310.1063/1.2433743 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.278937810.1063/1.2789378 ↗
18. Zhu Y. · 2019
19. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.260669910.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.2606699 ↗
20. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.269566610.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.2695666 ↗
21. 10.1002/pssb.20180008210.1002/pssb.201800082 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41524-020-00410-710.1038/s41524-020-00410-7 ↗
23. Buratti, Y.; Dick, J.; Gia, Q. L.; Hameiri, Z.A Machine Learning Approach to Defect Parameters Extraction: Using Random Forests to Inverse the Shockley-Read-Hall Equation. In 46th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist Conference; 2019; pp 3070–3073.10.1109/PVSC40753.2019.8980717 ↗
24. 10.1002/pip.347810.1002/pip.3478 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.mssp.2021.10619810.1016/j.mssp.2021.106198 ↗
26. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.300493010.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.3004930 ↗
27. Wagner-Mohnsen, H.; Esefelder, S.; Klöter, B.; Mitchell, B.; Schinke, C.; Bredemeier, D.; Jäger, P.; Brendel, R.Combining Numerical Simulations, Machine Learning and Genetic Algorithms for Optimizing a POCl3 Diffusion Process. In 2021 IEEE 48th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC); 2021; pp 0528–0531.10.1109/PVSC43889.2021.9518450 ↗
28. Ren, Z.; Oviedo, F.; Xue, H.; Thway, M.; Zhang, K.; Li, N.; Dario, J.; Layurova, M.; Wang, Y.; Tian, S.; Heumueller, T.; Birgersson, E.; Lin, F.; Sun, S.; Peters, I. M.; Stangl, R.; Brabec, C. J.; Buonassisi, T.Physics-Guided Characterization and Optimization of Solar Cells Using Surrogate Machine Learning Model. In 46th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist Conference; 2019; p 5.10.1109/PVSC40753.2019.8980715 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41524-020-0277-x10.1038/s41524-020-0277-x ↗
30. 10.1002/pip.353910.1002/pip.3539 ↗
31. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.301010510.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.3010105 ↗
32. 10.1002/pip.348410.1002/pip.3484 ↗
33. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.290603610.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2906036 ↗
34. Goodfellow I. · 2016
35. 10.1016/j.solener.2019.02.06710.1016/j.solener.2019.02.067 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.solener.2020.03.04910.1016/j.solener.2020.03.049 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.11481010.1016/j.eswa.2021.114810 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.infrared.2020.10333410.1016/j.infrared.2020.103334 ↗
39. Tian, S.; Li, W.; Li, S.; Tian, G.; Sun, L.; Ning, X.Image Defect Detection and Segmentation Algorithm of Solar Cell Based on Convolutional Neural Network. In 2021 6th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Signal Processing (ICSP); 2021; pp 154–157.10.1109/ICSP51882.2021.9408827 ↗
40. 10.1109/TII.2020.300802110.1109/TII.2020.3008021 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.223474710.1063/1.2234747 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.197897910.1063/1.1978979 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.07.02910.1016/j.solmat.2018.07.029 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.34541410.1063/1.345414 ↗
45. 10.1063/1.486777610.1063/1.4867776 ↗
46. 10.1063/1.481669410.1063/1.4816694 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevB.15.98910.1103/PhysRevB.15.989 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRev.119.150210.1103/PhysRev.119.1502 ↗
49. 10.1109/NUSOD.2005.151812810.1109/NUSOD.2005.1518128 ↗
50. 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-210.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 ↗
51. 10.48550/arXiv.1409.155610.48550/arXiv.1409.1556 ↗
52. 10.1023/A:101093340432410.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
53. Glantz S. A. · 1990
54. 10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.01010.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010 ↗
55. Pedregosa F. · Journal of Machine Learning Research · 2011 · 12 · 2825
56. Paszke A. · 2019 · 8026