Electrochemical Behaviors of a Vapor-Phase Polymerized Conductive Polymer Coated on LiV3O8in Li–Metal Rechargeable Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
A new coating method called vapor-phase polymerization (VPP) is used to coat a conductive polymer on LiV3O8 (LVO) surfaces for the first time in lithium–metal secondary batteries to protect the interface layer and enhance the electrochemical properties of the cathode. The VPP method can be used to coat an appropriate amount of the polymer and homogeneously coat the LVO active material surfaces because of the use of vapor-phase monomers. The presence of the coating layer was confirmed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. Polymer coating of LVO by VPP results in enhanced cyclic stability and rate capability at various C-rates. At 0.2 C-rate, it has high specific capacities of 254.7 and 272.2 mA h g–1 in the first and second cycles, respectively. Further, the capacity retention is 94.6% from the 2nd cycle to the 100th cycle. The improved electrochemical performance is attributed to the homogeneously conductive polymer formed by VPP, which can improve the electrical conductivity of the active material and inhibit dissolution by preventing direct contact with the electrolyte.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea University, 1, 5Ga, Anam-dong, Sungbuk-Gu, Seoul 136-701, Republic of Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea · Ministry of Knowledge Economy
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/3510464410.1038/35104644 ↗
2. 10.1021/jz100538410.1021/jz1005384 ↗
3. 10.1002/ange.20110781710.1002/ange.201107817 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.07610.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.076 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.02110.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.021 ↗
6. 10.1002/smll.20160314810.1002/smll.201603148 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.02610.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.026 ↗
8. 10.1039/c4ta00868e10.1039/c4ta00868e ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.01.03010.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.01.030 ↗
10. 10.1039/c1jm10976f10.1039/c1jm10976f ↗
11. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.05.07110.1016/j.electacta.2010.05.071 ↗
12. 10.1038/am.2012.3610.1038/am.2012.36 ↗
13. 10.1039/c4ta05616g10.1039/c4ta05616g ↗
14. 10.1007/s10008-011-1630-210.1007/s10008-011-1630-2 ↗
15. 10.1007/s13391-013-2189-010.1007/s13391-013-2189-0 ↗
16. Cao X. Y. · Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. · 2011 · 6 · 27010.1016/S1452-3981(23)14993-5 ↗
17. 10.1007/s13391-012-2082-210.1007/s13391-012-2082-2 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ssi.2013.01.02110.1016/j.ssi.2013.01.021 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.07810.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.078 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.01.12710.1016/j.electacta.2013.01.127 ↗
21. 10.1166/jnn.2015.1054610.1166/jnn.2015.10546 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ssi.2017.08.00210.1016/j.ssi.2017.08.002 ↗
23. 10.1016/0379-6779(86)90183-910.1016/0379-6779(86)90183-9 ↗
24. 10.1021/ma049365k10.1021/ma049365k ↗
25. 10.1016/j.carbon.2006.09.01110.1016/j.carbon.2006.09.011 ↗
26. 10.1002/pen.1025110.1002/pen.10251 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2011.03.02410.1016/j.synthmet.2011.03.024 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2007.03.01310.1016/j.synthmet.2007.03.013 ↗
29. 10.1039/c2jm32281a10.1039/c2jm32281a ↗
30. 10.1021/cm902986g10.1021/cm902986g ↗
31. 10.1021/nn405595r10.1021/nn405595r ↗
32. 10.1002/pola.1015910.1002/pola.10159 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.03010.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.030 ↗
34. 10.1002/(sici)1521-4095(199911)11:16<1379::aid-adma1379>3.0.co;2-q10.1002/(sici)1521-4095(199911)11:16<1379::aid-adma1379>3.0.co;2-q ↗
35. 10.1016/j.solmat.2005.02.00410.1016/j.solmat.2005.02.004 ↗
36. 10.1002/adma.20070061410.1002/adma.200700614 ↗
37. 10.1002/advs.20150019510.1002/advs.201500195 ↗