Graph Neural Networks for Carbon Dioxide Adsorption Prediction in Aluminum-Substituted Zeolites
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The ability to efficiently predict adsorption properties of zeolites can be of large benefit in accelerating the design process of novel materials. The existing configuration space for these materials is wide, while existing molecular simulation methods are computationally expensive. In this work, we propose a model which is 4 to 5 orders of magnitude faster at adsorption properties compared to molecular simulations. To validate the model, we generated data sets containing various aluminum configurations for the MOR, MFI, RHO and ITW zeolites along with their heat of adsorptions and Henry coefficients for CO 2, obtained from Monte Carlo simulations. The predictions obtained from the Machine Learning model are in agreement with the values obtained from the Monte Carlo simulations, confirming that the model can be used for property prediction. Furthermore, we show that the model can be used for identifying adsorption sites. Finally, we evaluate the capability of our model for generating novel zeolite configurations by using it in combination with a genetic algorithm.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612AZ Eindhoven, Netherlands
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.rineng.2022.10051210.1016/j.rineng.2022.100512 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jcou.2020.10125110.1016/j.jcou.2020.101251 ↗
3. 10.1166/jnn.2014.889310.1166/jnn.2014.8893 ↗
4. 10.1039/c1cp21761e10.1039/c1cp21761e ↗
5. 10.1021/jp401017u10.1021/jp401017u ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2006.05.05710.1016/j.jpcs.2006.05.057 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.envadv.2020.10001910.1016/j.envadv.2020.100019 ↗
8. 10.1155/2021/663789810.1155/2021/6637898 ↗
9. 10.2139/ssrn.406567610.2139/ssrn.4065676 ↗
10. 10.1002/ceat.20200035610.1002/ceat.202000356 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1119010.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11190 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c0125810.1021/acs.chemmater.3c01258 ↗
13. 10.1002/ange.20060313610.1002/ange.200603136 ↗
14. 10.3390/molecules2606151110.3390/molecules26061511 ↗
15. 10.1021/cr800264210.1021/cr8002642 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0559710.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05597 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41524-022-00734-610.1038/s41524-022-00734-6 ↗
18. 10.1039/C9SC03766G10.1039/C9SC03766G ↗
19. 10.1038/s43246-022-00315-610.1038/s43246-022-00315-6 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.jpca.9b0329010.1021/acs.jpca.9b03290 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b1076610.1021/acs.jpcc.9b10766 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0633410.1021/acs.jpcc.0c06334 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b0094010.1021/acs.jctc.9b00940 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b0062310.1021/acs.jcim.9b00623 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0116710.1021/acs.jpcc.0c01167 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c0009210.1021/acs.jcim.2c00092 ↗
27. He, K.; Zhang, X.; Ren, S.; Sun, J.Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016; pp 770–778.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c0029310.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00293 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.08.02010.1016/j.micromeso.2011.08.020 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.14530110.1103/PhysRevLett.120.145301 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41524-021-00650-110.1038/s41524-021-00650-1 ↗
32. Schütt K. · Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. · 2017 · 30 · 992
33. 10.1021/acsami.0c1651610.1021/acsami.0c16516 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.11166610.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111666 ↗
35. 10.1007/978-3-031-58547-0_1110.1007/978-3-031-58547-0_11 ↗
36. 10.1021/jp953791d10.1021/jp953791d ↗
37. Loewenstein W. · Am. Mineralogist: J. Earth and Planetary Mater. · 1954 · 39 · 92
38. Afeworki, M.; Dorset, D.; Kennedy, G.; Strohmaier, K. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis; Elsevier, 2004; Vol. 154, pp 1274–1281.
39. 10.1039/C9SC00725C10.1039/C9SC00725C ↗
40. 10.1039/c4cc01632g10.1039/c4cc01632g ↗
41. 10.1039/C7SC02531A10.1039/C7SC02531A ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jcis.2008.05.02810.1016/j.jcis.2008.05.028 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.02210.1016/j.cej.2017.10.022 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.173411010.1063/1.1734110 ↗
45. Baerlocher C. · 2007
46. 10.1080/08927022.2015.101008210.1080/08927022.2015.1010082 ↗
47. 10.1021/jp810871f10.1021/jp810871f ↗
48. Gilmer, J.; Schoenholz, S. S.; Riley, P. F.; Vinyals, O.; Dahl, G. E. Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistry. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2017; pp 1263–1272.
49. Kaba O. · Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. · 2022 · 35 · 4150
50. 10.1080/08927022.2018.142685510.1080/08927022.2018.1426855 ↗
51. Loshchilov, I.; Hutter, F. Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018.
52. Gad, A. F. PyGAD: An Intuitive Genetic Algorithm Python Library, 2021.
53. Xie, T.; Fu, X.; Ganea, O.E.; Barzilay, R.; Jaakkola, T. S. Crystal Diffusion Variational Autoencoder for Periodic Material Generation. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
54. Petković, M.; Vicent-Luna, J. M.; Menkovski, V.; Calero, S. Zeolite Property Prediction, 2024, https://github.com/marko-petkovic/zeolite-property-prediction (accessed Sep 12, 2024).