journal article·2023-12-20Open access

Targeting the Right Metrics for an Efficient Solvent-Free Formulation of PEO:LiTFSI:Li6PS5Cl Hybrid Solid Electrolyte

Ronan Chometon, Michaël Deschamps, Romain Dugas, Elisa Quemin, Benjamin Hennequart, Marc Deschamps, Jean-Marie Tarascon, Christel Laberty-Robert

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 15· Issue 50

Abstract

Hybrid solid electrolytes (HSEs) aim to combine the superior ionic conductivity of inorganic fillers with the scalable process of polymer electrolytes in a unique material for solid-state batteries. Pursuing the goal of optimizing the key metrics (σ ion ≥ 10 –4 S·cm –1 at 25 °C and self-standing property), we successfully developed an HSE based on a modified poly(ethylene oxide):LiTFSI organic matrix, which binds together a high loading (75 wt %) of Li 6 PS 5 Cl particles, following a solvent-free route. A rational study of available formulation parameters has enabled us to understand the role of each component in conductivity, mixing, and mechanical cohesion. Especially, the type of activation mechanism (Arrhenius or Vogel–Fulcher–Tammann (VFT)) and its associated energy are proposed as a new metric to unravel the ionic pathway inside the HSE. We showed that a polymer-in-ceramic approach is mandatory to obtain enhanced conduction through the HSE ceramic network, as well as superior mechanical properties, revealed by the tensile test. Probing the compatibility of phases, using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) alongside 7 Li nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), reveals the formation of an interphase, the quantity and resistivity of which grow with time and temperature. Finally, electrochemical performances are evaluated by assembling an HSE-based battery, which displays comparable stability as pure ceramic ones but still suffers from higher polarization and thus lower capacity. Altogether, we hope these findings provide valuable knowledge to develop a successful HSE, by placing the optimization of the right metrics at the core of the formulation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis · Assembly Line Balancing Optimization · Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Collège de France, Chaire de Chimie du Solide et de l’Energie, UMR8260, 11 place Marcelin Berthelot, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France

Laboratoire de Chimie de la Matière Condensée Sorbonne Université, UMR7574, 4 place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France

Blue Solutions, Odet, 29500 Ergué-Gabéric, France

Réseau sur le Stockage Électrochimique de l’Energie (RS2E), FR CNRS 3459, 80039 Amiens, France

CNRS-CEMHTI, UPR3079, Université d’Orléans, 1D avenue de la Recherche Scientifique, Orléans Cedex, 45071 France

Funding

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · Blue Solutions

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.14110.1038/nenergy.2016.141 ↗
2. 10.1038/nmat306610.1038/nmat3066 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41467-020-18736-710.1038/s41467-020-18736-7 ↗
4. 10.1039/C9TA12889A10.1039/C9TA12889A ↗
5. 10.1039/C5TA03471J10.1039/C5TA03471J ↗
6. 10.1016/0032-3861(73)90146-810.1016/0032-3861(73)90146-8 ↗
7. Armand, M.; Duclot, M. Nouveaux matériaux élastomères à conduction ionique, 1980, 7832976, June 20.
8. Technologie de batteries - Bollore - Blue Solutions. https://www.blue-solutions.com/technologie-de-batteries/ (accessed March 15, 2023).
9. Teyssot, A. Etude de l’interface lithium métal/électrolyte polymère fondu ou gélifié. Phd thesis, Ecole Polytechnique X, 2005. https://pastel.archives-ouvertes.fr/pastel-00001112 (accessed May 31, 2021).
10. 10.1016/S0013-4686(01)00458-310.1016/S0013-4686(01)00458-3 ↗
11. 10.1149/1.139342310.1149/1.1393423 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0013-4686(03)00191-910.1016/S0013-4686(03)00191-9 ↗
13. 10.1002/anie.20160753910.1002/anie.201607539 ↗
14. 10.1149/2.F06192if10.1149/2.F06192if ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.7b1730110.1021/acsami.7b17301 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0200810.1021/acsaem.8b02008 ↗
17. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0090410.1021/acssuschemeng.1c00904 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.03.01610.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.03.016 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.07.04110.1016/j.apsusc.2019.07.041 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.9b2296810.1021/acsami.9b22968 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.03710.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.037 ↗
22. 10.1149/1945-7111/abcd1210.1149/1945-7111/abcd12 ↗
23. 10.1002/aesr.20200007710.1002/aesr.202000077 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0111110.1021/acsaem.9b01111 ↗
25. 10.1038/srep2315010.1038/srep23150 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matt.2022.01.01110.1016/j.matt.2022.01.011 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ssi.2012.09.02010.1016/j.ssi.2012.09.020 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c0361410.1021/acs.jpcc.1c03614 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.04410.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.044 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ssi.2007.11.03510.1016/j.ssi.2007.11.035 ↗
31. 10.1021/cr00083a00610.1021/cr00083a006 ↗
32. 10.1039/C9CP00664H10.1039/C9CP00664H ↗
33. Vogel D. H. · Phys. Z. · 1921 · 22 · 645
34. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1925.tb16731.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1925.tb16731.x ↗
35. 10.1002/zaac.1926156012110.1002/zaac.19261560121 ↗
36. MacCallum J. R. · 1989
37. 10.1088/0953-8984/2/17/00210.1088/0953-8984/2/17/002 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.chemphys.2012.12.02810.1016/j.chemphys.2012.12.028 ↗
39. 10.1002/adma.20180414210.1002/adma.201804142 ↗
40. 10.1149/2.1321902jes10.1149/2.1321902jes ↗
41. 10.1021/acsami.9b1450610.1021/acsami.9b14506 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.499361410.1063/1.4993614 ↗
43. 10.1039/D2EE03358E10.1039/D2EE03358E ↗
44. 10.1002/anie.20221804410.1002/anie.202218044 ↗