Unleashing the Power of 2D MoS2: In Situ TEM Study of Its Potential as Diffusion Barriers in Ru Interconnects
Source abstract
Abstract
This study presents the utilization of MoS 2 as a diffusion barrier for metal interconnects, in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observations are employed for comprehensive understanding. The diffusion-blocking ability of MoS 2 is discussed by the diffusion and phase transformation between Ru and Si via TEM diffraction and imaging. When the sample is heated to a high temperature such that MoS 2 loses the ability to block the diffusion, Si diffuses through the MoS 2 into the Ru layer, leading to the formation of Ru 2 Si 3 . Both multilayer and monolayer (1L) MoS 2 exhibit exceptional diffusion-blocking ability up to 800 °C. Furthermore, plasma-treated 1L-MoS 2 shows a slightly low diffusion-blocking temperature of 750 °C, while the dangling bonds in MoS 2 improve the interfacial adhesion. These findings suggest that MoS 2 holds great potential as a diffusion barrier for metal interconnects.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: MXene and MAX Phase Materials · 2D Materials and Applications · Semiconductor materials and interfaces
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
Funding
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company · National Science and Technology Council
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1147/rd.425.056710.1147/rd.425.0567 ↗
2. 10.1557/PROC-427-12110.1557/PROC-427-121 ↗
3. 10.1116/1.57562010.1116/1.575620 ↗
4. 10.1109/LED.2017.278888910.1109/LED.2017.2788889 ↗
5. Zhang, X.; Huang, H.; Patlolla, R.; Mont, F. W.; Lin, X.; Raymond, M.; Labelle, C.; Ryan, E. T.; Canaperi, D.; Standaert, T. E. In Methods to Lower the Resistivity of Ruthenium Interconnects at 7 nm Node and Beyond, IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference (IITC); IEEE, 2017; pp 1–3.10.1109/IITC-AMC.2017.7968941 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.504643010.1063/1.5046430 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.513367110.1063/1.5133671 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.6b0718110.1021/acsami.6b07181 ↗
9. 10.3390/ma1321504910.3390/ma13215049 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41699-017-0044-010.1038/s41699-017-0044-0 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.mtsust.2021.10007310.1016/j.mtsust.2021.100073 ↗
12. 10.1021/ja302846n10.1021/ja302846n ↗
13. 10.1038/nnano.2010.27910.1038/nnano.2010.279 ↗
14. 10.1109/LED.2018.282706110.1109/LED.2018.2827061 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.9b0338110.1021/acsami.9b03381 ↗
16. 10.1063/5.001373710.1063/5.0013737 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0902810.1021/acs.jpcc.9b09028 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0128110.1021/acsnano.5b01281 ↗
19. 10.1002/adma.20110479810.1002/adma.201104798 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.475126610.1063/1.4751266 ↗
21. Smithe, K. K. H.; Zhu, Z.; Bailey, C. S.; Pop, E.; Yoon, A. Investigation of Monolayer MX2 as Sub-Nanometer Copper Diffusion Barriers, IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS); IEEE, 2018.10.1109/IRPS.2018.8353681 ↗
22. 10.1002/adfm.20220666710.1002/adfm.202206667 ↗
23. 10.1149/2.0061904jss10.1149/2.0061904jss ↗
24. 10.1021/nn500532f10.1021/nn500532f ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b1129810.1021/acs.jpcc.8b11298 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14746110.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147461 ↗
27. 10.1021/jp506964m10.1021/jp506964m ↗
28. 10.1039/C4NR04532G10.1039/C4NR04532G ↗
29. 10.1063/1.33131910.1063/1.331319 ↗
30. 10.1039/C3NR06771H10.1039/C3NR06771H ↗
31. 10.1016/S0040-6090(01)00782-910.1016/S0040-6090(01)00782-9 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.28310.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.283 ↗