journal article·2023-06-07

Enhanced Decomposition of Ammonium Perchlorate–Ethyl Cellulose–Molybdenum Disulfide Nanocomposites

Alfred J. Baca, Michael D. Garrison, Lidia Kuo, Feiyu Xu, Lawrence C. Baldwin, Alexander S. Hyla, Michael R. Zachariah, Mark C. Hersam

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 15· Issue 22
Publisher page

Abstract

Ammonium perchlorate (AP) is commonly used in propulsion technology. Recent studies have demonstrated that two-dimensional (2D) nanomaterials such as graphene (Gr) and hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) dispersed with nitrocellulose (NC) can conformally coat the surface of AP particles and enhance the reactivity of AP. In this work, the effectiveness of ethyl cellulose (EC) as an alternative to NC was studied. Using a similar encapsulation procedure as in recent work, Gr and hBN dispersed with EC were used to synthesize the composite materials Gr–EC–AP and hBN–EC–AP. Additionally, EC was used because the polymer can be used to disperse other 2D nanomaterials, specifically molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 ), which has semiconducting properties. While Gr and hBN dispersed in EC had a minimal effect on the reactivity of AP, MoS 2 dispersed in EC significantly enhanced the decomposition behavior of AP compared to the control and other 2D nanomaterials, as evidenced by a pronounced low-temperature decomposition event (LTD) centered at 300 °C and then complete high-temperature decomposition (HTD) below 400 °C. Moreover, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) showed a 5% mass loss temperature ( T d5% ) of 291 °C for the MoS 2 -coated AP, which was 17 °C lower than the AP control. The kinetic parameters for the three encapsulated AP samples were calculated using the Kissinger equation and confirmed a lower activation energy pathway for the MoS 2 (86 kJ/mol) composite compared to pure AP (137 kJ/mol). This unique behavior of MoS 2 is likely due to enhanced oxidation–reduction of AP during the initial stages of the reaction via a transition metal-catalyzed pathway. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations showed that the interactions between AP and MoS 2 were stronger than AP on the Gr or hBN surfaces. Overall, this study complements previous work on NC-wrapped AP composites and demonstrates the unique roles of the disperagent and 2D nanomaterial in tuning the thermal decomposition of AP.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · Thermal and Kinetic Analysis · Synthesis of Tetrazole Derivatives

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Research Office, Chemistry Branch, US NAVY, NAWCWD, China Lake, California 93555, United States

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States

Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States

RDT&E Department, Materials Science Branch, US NAVY, NSWC IHD, Indian Head, Maryland 20640, United States

Funding

U.S. Department of Commerce · U.S. Department of Defense

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.tca.2005.11.03810.1016/j.tca.2005.11.038 ↗
2. 10.1021/cr60260a00510.1021/cr60260a005 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.12.03310.1016/j.arabjc.2014.12.033 ↗
4. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.773-774.47010.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.773-774.470 ↗
5. Sutton G. P. · 2000
6. 10.1021/j100701a03310.1021/j100701a033 ↗
7. 10.1021/cm990438210.1021/cm9904382 ↗
8. 10.1080/07370652.2021.189591410.1080/07370652.2021.1895914 ↗
9. 10.1002/prep.20170007910.1002/prep.201700079 ↗
10. 10.1039/C5RA11226E10.1039/C5RA11226E ↗
11. 10.1098/rspa.1954.028410.1098/rspa.1954.0284 ↗
12. 10.1039/jr959000083710.1039/jr9590000837 ↗
13. 10.1002/prep.1990015060710.1002/prep.19900150607 ↗
14. 10.1002/prep.20150006710.1002/prep.201500067 ↗
15. 10.2514/3.408510.2514/3.4085 ↗
16. 10.1021/ac60168a01110.1021/ac60168a011 ↗
17. 10.1080/07370652.2012.72545310.1080/07370652.2012.725453 ↗
18. Raevsky A. V. · Dokl. AN SSSR · 1963 · 151 · 886
19. 10.1039/tf964600178310.1039/tf9646001783 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.12860310.1016/j.cej.2021.128603 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jssc.2021.12230110.1016/j.jssc.2021.122301 ↗
22. 10.1039/C5RA05903H10.1039/C5RA05903H ↗
23. 10.1007/s11144-020-01848-y10.1007/s11144-020-01848-y ↗
24. 10.1039/C6RA06860J10.1039/C6RA06860J ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0918910.1021/acs.jpcc.8b09189 ↗
26. 10.1039/C7RA06012B10.1039/C7RA06012B ↗
27. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.11.00910.1016/j.carbon.2012.11.009 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c0310010.1021/acs.chemmater.1c03100 ↗
29. 10.1039/C6RA21300F10.1039/C6RA21300F ↗
30. 10.1002/adfm.20190224510.1002/adfm.201902245 ↗
31. 10.1039/D0TC03309J10.1039/D0TC03309J ↗
32. 10.1007/BF0132753410.1007/BF01327534 ↗
33. 10.1107/S010827010703735310.1107/S0108270107037353 ↗
34. 10.1107/S002188987901252810.1107/S0021889879012528 ↗
35. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/39550210.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 ↗
36. 10.1088/1361-648X/aa8f7910.1088/1361-648X/aa8f79 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.139610.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1396 ↗
40. 10.1002/jcc.2175910.1002/jcc.21759 ↗
41. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/8/08420410.1088/0953-8984/21/8/084204 ↗
42. 10.1039/c2cp40261k10.1039/c2cp40261k ↗
43. Marzari, N. Ab-initio Molecular Dynamics for Metallic Systems. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cambridge: Cambridge, UK, 1996.
44. Press W. H. · 2007
45. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Li, X.; Caricato, M.; Marenich, A. V.; Bloino, J.; Janesko, B. G.; Gomperts, R.; Mennucci, B.; Hratchian, H. P.; Ortiz, J. V.; Izmaylov, A. F.; Sonnenberg, J. L.; Williams-Young, D.; Ding, F.; Lipparini, F.; Egidi, F.; Goings, J.; Peng, B.; Petrone, A.; Henderson, T.; Ranasinghe, D.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Gao, J.; Rega, N.; Zheng, G.; Liang, W.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Vreven, T.; Throssell, K.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Peralta, J. E.; Ogliaro, F.; Bearpark, M. J.; Heyd, J. J.; Brothers, E. N.; Kudin, K. N.; Staroverov, V. N.; Keith, T. A.; Kobayashi, R.; Normand, J.; Raghavachari, K.; Rendell, A. P.; Burant, J. C.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Cossi, M.; Millam, J. M.; Klene, M.; Adamo, C.; Cammi, R.; Ochterski, J. W.; Martin, R. L.; Morokuma, K.; Farkas, O.; Foresman, J. B.; Fox, D. J. Gaussian 16; revision C.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford CT, USA, 2016.
46. 10.1016/j.apt.2010.01.00410.1016/j.apt.2010.01.004 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0002910.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00029 ↗
48. 10.1135/cccc1994225310.1135/cccc19942253 ↗
49. Mitchell P. C. H. · Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry · 2022
50. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0433110.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04331 ↗
51. 10.1039/C9TC03935J10.1039/C9TC03935J ↗
52. 10.1002/polc.507006012110.1002/polc.5070060121 ↗
53. 10.1021/jp407526r10.1021/jp407526r ↗
54. 10.1039/C1CP22666E10.1039/C1CP22666E ↗
55. 10.1039/C1CP22667C10.1039/C1CP22667C ↗
56. 10.1021/jp103171h10.1021/jp103171h ↗
57. 10.1021/jp062746a10.1021/jp062746a ↗