journal article·2023-11-08

Design of Synthetic Hydrogel Compositions for Noncovalent Protein Recognition

John R. Clegg, Nicholas A. Peppas

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 15· Issue 44
Publisher page

Abstract

Multifunctional hydrogels composed of segments with ionizable, hydrophilic, and hydrophobic monomers have been optimized for sensing, bioseparation, and therapeutic applications. While the "biological identity" of bound proteins from biofluids underlies device performance in each context, design rules that predict protein binding outcomes from hydrogel design parameters are lacking. Uniquely, hydrogel designs that influence protein affinity (e.g., ionizable monomers, hydrophobic moieties, conjugated ligands, cross-linking) also affect physical properties (e.g., matrix stiffness, volumetric swelling). Here, we evaluated the influence of hydrophobic comonomer steric bulk and quantity on the protein recognition characteristics of ionizable microscale hydrogels (microgels) while controlling for swelling. Using a library synthesis approach, we identified compositions that balance the practical balance between protein-microgel affinity and the loaded mass at saturation. Intermediate quantities (10-30 mol %) of hydrophobic comonomer increased the equilibrium binding of certain model proteins (lysozyme, lactoferrin) in buffer conditions that favored complementary electrostatic interactions. Solvent-accessible surface area analysis of model proteins identified arginine content as highly predictive of model proteins' binding to our library of hydrogels containing acidic and hydrophobic comonomers. Taken together, we established an empirical framework for characterizing the molecular recognition properties of multifunctional hydrogels. Our study is the first to identify solvent-accessible arginine as an important predictor for protein binding to hydrogels containing both acidic and hydrophobic subunits.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials · Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States

McKetta Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States

Institute for Biomaterials, Drug Delivery, and Regenerative Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States

Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States

Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care and Department of Pediatrics, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States

Funding

National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering · National Science Foundation · UT-Portugal Collaborative Research Program · Cockrell Family Chair Foundation

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c0125610.1021/acs.biomac.0c01256 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.mser.2015.04.00110.1016/j.mser.2015.04.001 ↗
3. 10.1038/nnano.2012.20710.1038/nnano.2012.207 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41565-020-0669-610.1038/s41565-020-0669-6 ↗
5. 10.1073/pnas.210925611810.1073/pnas.2109256118 ↗
6. 10.1021/nn406101210.1021/nn4061012 ↗
7. 10.1002/adhm.20200215310.1002/adhm.202002153 ↗
8. Zhang P. · 2020 · 50710.1016/B978-0-12-816137-1.00034-9 ↗
9. 10.1126/sciadv.aax794610.1126/sciadv.aax7946 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.biomac.6b0148210.1021/acs.biomac.6b01482 ↗
11. 10.1039/C9SM01981B10.1039/C9SM01981B ↗
12. 10.1146/annurev.ms.26.080196.00205310.1146/annurev.ms.26.080196.002053 ↗
13. 10.1089/ten.teb.2016.020210.1089/ten.teb.2016.0202 ↗
14. 10.1002/jbm.a.1009810.1002/jbm.a.10098 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.05.02610.1016/j.msec.2016.05.026 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.02410.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.024 ↗
17. 10.1126/sciadv.160051910.1126/sciadv.1600519 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.addr.2015.10.01910.1016/j.addr.2015.10.019 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.03.00810.1016/j.jconrel.2020.03.008 ↗
20. 10.2217/nnm-2019-038110.2217/nnm-2019-0381 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c0036610.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00366 ↗
22. 10.1021/acscentsci.9b0122210.1021/acscentsci.9b01222 ↗
23. 10.1007/s13346-020-00745-010.1007/s13346-020-00745-0 ↗
24. 10.1039/D0AN00633E10.1039/D0AN00633E ↗
25. 10.1007/s40883-017-0028-910.1007/s40883-017-0028-9 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b0053310.1021/acs.accounts.6b00533 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b0075310.1021/acs.macromol.9b00753 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.503699910.1063/1.5036999 ↗
29. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.7110.1038/natrevmats.2016.71 ↗
30. 10.1039/C7AN00787F10.1039/C7AN00787F ↗
31. 10.1039/D0TB01627F10.1039/D0TB01627F ↗
32. 10.1021/acsomega.8b0073810.1021/acsomega.8b00738 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c0244610.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02446 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.09.06510.1016/j.actbio.2022.09.065 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsami.9b0990010.1021/acsami.9b09900 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.02210.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.022 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cocis.2018.12.00410.1016/j.cocis.2018.12.004 ↗
38. 10.1021/jp108399g10.1021/jp108399g ↗
39. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0434810.1021/acsnano.8b04348 ↗
40. 10.1039/D0CC02200D10.1039/D0CC02200D ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c0294110.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02941 ↗
42. 10.1002/jbm.a.3602910.1002/jbm.a.36029 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c0011910.1021/acs.biomac.1c00119 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c0169010.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01690 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11873210.1016/j.memsci.2020.118732 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.02210.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.022 ↗