journal article·2024-10-02

Machine Learning Predictions of Methane Storage in MOFs: Diverse Materials, Multiple Operating Conditions, and Reverse Models

Alauddin Ahmed, Karabi Nath, Adam J. Matzger, Donald J. Siegel

Publisher page

Abstract

A machine learning (ML) model is developed for predicting useable methane (CH 4 ) capacities in metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). The model applies to a wide variety of MOFs, including those with and without open metal sites, and predicts capacities for multiple pressure swing conditions. Despite its wider applicability, the model requires only 5 measurable structural features as input, yet achieves accuracies that surpass less-general models. Application of the model to a database of more than a million hypothetical MOFs identified several hundred whose capacities surpass that of the benchmark MOF, UMCM-152. Guided by the computational predictions, one of the promising candidates, UMCM-153, was synthesized and demonstrated to achieve superior volumetric capacity for CH 4 . Feature importance analyses reveal that pore volume and gravimetric surface area are the most important features for predicting CH 4 capacity in MOFs. Finally, a reverse ML model is demonstrated. This model predicts the set of elementary MOF structural properties needed to achieve a desired CH 4 capacity for a prescribed operating condition.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis · Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States

Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan, 930 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States

Macromolecular Science and Engineering Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1055, United States

Walker Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas Materials Institute, and Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, 204 E. Dean Keeton Street, Austin, Texas 78712-1591, United States

Funding

Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office

References (82)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/jacs.6b0526110.1021/jacs.6b05261 ↗
2. 10.1039/C3SC52633J10.1039/C3SC52633J ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0276810.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02768 ↗
4. 10.1021/ja404528910.1021/ja4045289 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b0251010.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02510 ↗
6. Sinor, J. E. Comparison of CNG and LNG Technologies for Transportation Applications; 1992. https://www.afdc.energy.gov/pdfs/2451.pdf.10.2172/5909852 ↗
7. Vimmerstedt, L. Using Natural Gas for Vehicles: Comparing Three Technologies; 2015. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy16osti/64267.pdf (accessed Sep 18, 2017).
8. Schroeder A. · 2016
9. Werpy, M. R.; Santini, D.; Burnham, A.; Mintz, M. Natural Gas Vehicles: Status, Barriers, and Opportunities Energy Systems Division; 2010. https://afdc.energy.gov/files/pdfs/anl_esd_10-4.pdf (accessed 11 15, 2018).
10. 10.1039/C4EE03515A10.1039/C4EE03515A ↗
11. 10.1021/jp502359q10.1021/jp502359q ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0761810.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07618 ↗
13. 10.1021/ja412393910.1021/ja4123939 ↗
14. 10.1002/anie.20100758310.1002/anie.201007583 ↗
15. 10.1002/ANIE.20046278710.1002/ANIE.200462787 ↗
16. 10.1021/ja077163910.1021/ja0771639 ↗
17. 10.1021/cm402094210.1021/cm4020942 ↗
18. 10.1039/c4ta01860e10.1039/c4ta01860e ↗
19. 10.1039/c3ee41166d10.1039/c3ee41166d ↗
20. 10.1002/anie.20220357510.1002/anie.202203575 ↗
21. 10.1039/c3ee24506c10.1039/c3ee24506c ↗
22. 10.1039/c3sc21769h10.1039/c3sc21769h ↗
23. 10.1021/cm502304e10.1021/cm502304e ↗
24. 10.1002/CHEM.20130251510.1002/CHEM.201302515 ↗
25. 10.1021/cm404155s10.1021/cm404155s ↗
26. 10.1021/ja302623w10.1021/ja302623w ↗
27. 10.1002/ADMA.20170479210.1002/ADMA.201704792 ↗
28. 10.1021/jacs.5b0705310.1021/jacs.5b07053 ↗
29. Huong T. T. T. · VNU J. Sci. · 2016 · 32 · 67
30. 10.1351/PAC-REC-12-11-2010.1351/PAC-REC-12-11-20 ↗
31. 10.1002/ange.20140061910.1002/ange.201400619 ↗
32. 10.1021/jp906984z10.1021/jp906984z ↗
33. 10.1039/c0cp02255a10.1039/c0cp02255a ↗
34. 10.1038/nmat333610.1038/nmat3336 ↗
35. 10.1039/c2cs35251f10.1039/c2cs35251f ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0044110.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00441 ↗
37. 10.1002/ejic.20160036510.1002/ejic.201600365 ↗
38. 10.1021/jp401920y10.1021/jp401920y ↗
39. 10.1039/C6SC01477A10.1039/C6SC01477A ↗
40. 10.1021/cm502594j10.1021/cm502594j ↗
41. 10.1039/C9TA01752F10.1039/C9TA01752F ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0270010.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02700 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.jced.9b0083510.1021/acs.jced.9b00835 ↗
44. 10.1126/sciadv.160090910.1126/sciadv.1600909 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0225710.1021/acs.chemmater.8b02257 ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0942010.1021/acs.jpcc.8b09420 ↗
47. 10.1039/C8CE01637B10.1039/C8CE01637B ↗
48. 10.1021/cm401978e10.1021/cm401978e ↗
49. 10.1016/j.patter.2021.10029110.1016/j.patter.2021.100291 ↗
50. 10.1038/s41467-019-09365-w10.1038/s41467-019-09365-w ↗
51. 10.1039/C5CP00002E10.1039/C5CP00002E ↗
52. Moghadam P. Z. · Chemistry of Materials · 2017 · 29 · 261810.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00441 ↗
53. 10.1107/S205252061600395410.1107/S2052520616003954 ↗
54. 10.1021/jp512348610.1021/jp5123486 ↗
55. 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b0084810.1021/acs.cgd.7b00848 ↗
56. 10.1038/nchem.119210.1038/nchem.1192 ↗
57. Boyd P. G. · Nature · 2019 · 576 · 25310.1038/s41586-019-1798-7 ↗
58. 10.1039/C6CE00407E10.1039/C6CE00407E ↗
59. R-WLLFHS: Https://Github.Com/Snurr-Group/Reduced-HMOF-Database.
60. Cioce, C. R. Computational Investigations of Potential Energy Function Development for Metal-Organic Framework Simulations, Metal Carbenes, and Chemical Warfare Agents. Dissertation, University of South Florida, 2015. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/5666.
61. Siderius D. W. · 2020
62. 10.1021/j100389a01010.1021/j100389a010 ↗
63. 10.1080/08927022.2013.84299410.1080/08927022.2013.842994 ↗
64. 10.1021/la500967w10.1021/la500967w ↗
65. GitHub - emmhald/open_metal_detector. https://github.com/emmhald/open_metal_detector (accessed June 03, 2021).
66. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.08.02010.1016/j.micromeso.2011.08.020 ↗
67. 10.1039/c3ce41057a10.1039/c3ce41057a ↗
68. 10.1088/1742-6596/574/1/01210310.1088/1742-6596/574/1/012103 ↗
69. 10.1021/ja00051a04010.1021/ja00051a040 ↗
70. 10.1021/jp972543+10.1021/jp972543+ ↗
71. Sadus R. J. · 1999
72. Frenkel D. · 2001
73. 10.1080/08927022.2015.101008210.1080/08927022.2015.1010082 ↗
74. 10.1021/J100161A07010.1021/J100161A070 ↗
75. Ali, M. PyCaret: An open source, low-code machine learning library in Python. 2020. https://www.pycaret.org (accessed April 29, 2023).
76. Optuna: A hyperparameter optimization framework. https://optuna.readthedocs.io/en/stable/index.html. https://optuna.readthedocs.io/en/stable/reference/index.html (accessed April 29, 2023).
77. 10.1021/ja071174k10.1021/ja071174k ↗
78. Lemmon E.
79. 10.1063/1.55589810.1063/1.555898 ↗
80. Machine Learning Models for Predicting Methane Storage and Optimal Structure of MOFs Across Multiple Operating Conditions. https://figshare.com/s/2e9d818bf60169a26148 (accessed April 21, 2024).
81. 10.1039/C8EE01085D10.1039/C8EE01085D ↗
82. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.10949810.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109498 ↗