journal article·2019-04

Calibration of Atom Probe Tomography Reconstructions Through Correlation with Electron Micrographs

Isabelle Mouton, Shyam Katnagallu, Surendra Kumar Makineni, Oana Cojocaru-Mirédin, Torsten Schwarz, Leigh Thomas Stephenson, Dierk Raabe, Baptiste Gault

Microscopy and Microanalysis· Volume 25· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Although atom probe tomography (APT) reconstructions do not directly influence the local elemental analysis, any structural inferences from APT volumes demand a reliable reconstruction of the point cloud. Accurate estimation of the reconstruction parameters is crucial to obtain reliable spatial scaling. In the current work, a new automated approach of calibrating atom probe reconstructions is developed using only one correlative projection electron microscopy (EM) image. We employed an algorithm that implements a 2D cross-correlation of microstructural features observed in both the APT reconstructions and the corresponding EM image. We apply this protocol to calibrate reconstructions in a Cu(In,Ga)Se2-based semiconductor and in a Co-based superalloy. This work enables us to couple chemical precision to structural information with relative ease.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.02.01110.1016/j.ultramic.2015.02.011 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0169310.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01693 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11837-018-2802-710.1007/s11837-018-2802-7 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.312931010.1063/1.3129310 ↗
5. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2011.03522.x10.1111/j.1365-2818.2011.03522.x ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.03.01010.1016/j.ultramic.2013.03.010 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.03.01710.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.03.017 ↗
8. 10.1002/pip.296610.1002/pip.2966 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.270975810.1063/1.2709758 ↗
10. Sarvaiya JN , Patnaik S & Bombaywala S (2009). Image Registration by Template Matching Using Normalized Cross-Correlation. In 2009 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Control, and Telecommunication Technologies, pp. 819–822.10.1109/ACT.2009.207 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0262-8856(00)00101-310.1016/S0262-8856(00)00101-3 ↗
12. 10.1017/S143192761700003410.1017/S1431927617000034 ↗
13. 10.1021/jz500259c10.1021/jz500259c ↗
14. 10.1021/nl403476810.1021/nl4034768 ↗
15. 10.1016/0169-4332(94)00561-310.1016/0169-4332(94)00561-3 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.03.00810.1016/j.ultramic.2016.03.008 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.03.03410.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.03.034 ↗
18. 10.1002/sia.248910.1002/sia.2489 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.07.00810.1016/j.ultramic.2016.07.008 ↗
20. 10.1017/S143192760808069010.1017/S1431927608080690 ↗
21. Gault · 2007
22. 10.1063/1.306819710.1063/1.3068197 ↗
23. 10.1017/S143192760606697910.1017/S1431927606066979 ↗
24. 10.1017/S155192950005978210.1017/S1551929500059782 ↗
25. 10.1017/S143192761601249610.1017/S1431927616012496 ↗
26. 10.1016/S1359-6462(01)01058-210.1016/S1359-6462(01)01058-2 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.01610.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.016 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.11.00910.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.11.009 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.06.00710.1016/j.ultramic.2017.06.007 ↗
30. 10.1109/TSMC.1978.430994410.1109/TSMC.1978.4309944 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.06.00810.1016/j.ultramic.2006.06.008 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.04.00110.1016/j.ultramic.2011.04.001 ↗