Calibration of Atom Probe Tomography Reconstructions Through Correlation with Electron Micrographs
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Although atom probe tomography (APT) reconstructions do not directly influence the local elemental analysis, any structural inferences from APT volumes demand a reliable reconstruction of the point cloud. Accurate estimation of the reconstruction parameters is crucial to obtain reliable spatial scaling. In the current work, a new automated approach of calibrating atom probe reconstructions is developed using only one correlative projection electron microscopy (EM) image. We employed an algorithm that implements a 2D cross-correlation of microstructural features observed in both the APT reconstructions and the corresponding EM image. We apply this protocol to calibrate reconstructions in a Cu(In,Ga)Se2-based semiconductor and in a Co-based superalloy. This work enables us to couple chemical precision to structural information with relative ease.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.02.01110.1016/j.ultramic.2015.02.011 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0169310.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01693 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11837-018-2802-710.1007/s11837-018-2802-7 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.312931010.1063/1.3129310 ↗
5. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2011.03522.x10.1111/j.1365-2818.2011.03522.x ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.03.01010.1016/j.ultramic.2013.03.010 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.03.01710.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.03.017 ↗
8. 10.1002/pip.296610.1002/pip.2966 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.270975810.1063/1.2709758 ↗
10. Sarvaiya JN , Patnaik S & Bombaywala S (2009). Image Registration by Template Matching Using Normalized Cross-Correlation. In 2009 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Control, and Telecommunication Technologies, pp. 819–822.10.1109/ACT.2009.207 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0262-8856(00)00101-310.1016/S0262-8856(00)00101-3 ↗
12. 10.1017/S143192761700003410.1017/S1431927617000034 ↗
13. 10.1021/jz500259c10.1021/jz500259c ↗
14. 10.1021/nl403476810.1021/nl4034768 ↗
15. 10.1016/0169-4332(94)00561-310.1016/0169-4332(94)00561-3 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.03.00810.1016/j.ultramic.2016.03.008 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.03.03410.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.03.034 ↗
18. 10.1002/sia.248910.1002/sia.2489 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.07.00810.1016/j.ultramic.2016.07.008 ↗
20. 10.1017/S143192760808069010.1017/S1431927608080690 ↗
21. Gault · 2007
22. 10.1063/1.306819710.1063/1.3068197 ↗
23. 10.1017/S143192760606697910.1017/S1431927606066979 ↗
24. 10.1017/S155192950005978210.1017/S1551929500059782 ↗
25. 10.1017/S143192761601249610.1017/S1431927616012496 ↗
26. 10.1016/S1359-6462(01)01058-210.1016/S1359-6462(01)01058-2 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.01610.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.016 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.11.00910.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.11.009 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.06.00710.1016/j.ultramic.2017.06.007 ↗
30. 10.1109/TSMC.1978.430994410.1109/TSMC.1978.4309944 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.06.00810.1016/j.ultramic.2006.06.008 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.04.00110.1016/j.ultramic.2011.04.001 ↗