journal article·2014-08

Quantitative Strain and Compositional Studies of InxGa1−xAs Epilayer in a GaAs-based pHEMT Device Structure by TEM Techniques

Duggi V. Sridhara Rao, Ramachandran Sankarasubramanian, Kuttanellore Muraleedharan, Thorsten Mehrtens, Andreas Rosenauer, Dipankar Banerjee

Microscopy and Microanalysis· Volume 20· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract In GaAs-based pseudomorphic high-electron mobility transistor device structures, strain and composition of the InxGa1−xAs channel layer are very important as they influence the electronic properties of these devices. In this context, transmission electron microscopy techniques such as (002) dark-field imaging, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) imaging, scanning transmission electron microscopy-high angle annular dark field (STEM-HAADF) imaging and selected area diffraction, are useful. A quantitative comparative study using these techniques is relevant for assessing the merits and limitations of the respective techniques. In this article, we have investigated strain and composition of the InxGa1−xAs layer with the mentioned techniques and compared the results. The HRTEM images were investigated with strain state analysis. The indium content in this layer was quantified by HAADF imaging and correlated with STEM simulations. The studies showed that the InxGa1−xAs channel layer was pseudomorphically grown leading to tetragonal strain along the [001] growth direction and that the average indium content (x) in the epilayer is ~0.12. We found consistency in the results obtained using various methods of analysis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Sridhara Rao · 2011 · 1232
2. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2006.01551.x10.1111/j.1365-2818.2006.01551.x ↗
3. Rosenauer · 2003 · 57
4. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.08532610.1103/PhysRevB.72.085326 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.16530610.1103/PhysRevB.74.165306 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2004.09.00310.1016/j.ultramic.2004.09.003 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.9885610.1063/1.98856 ↗
8. Digital analysis of high resolution transmission electron microscopy lattice images
9. 10.1107/S010876739501437110.1107/S0108767395014371 ↗
10. Howes · 1985
11. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2009.07.01010.1016/j.ultramic.2009.07.010 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.03.01410.1016/j.ultramic.2012.03.014 ↗
13. 10.1007/978-1-4419-7200-210.1007/978-1-4419-7200-2 ↗
14. 10.1080/0141861970820720310.1080/01418619708207203 ↗
15. JEMS (2001). Electron Microscopy Software, Version 1.0724W2001, developed by Stadelmann, P., EPFL, Switzerland.
16. Evaluation of elastic constants of AlN, GaN, and InN
17. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.03.01810.1016/j.ultramic.2013.03.018 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2009.05.00310.1016/j.ultramic.2009.05.003 ↗